Literature DB >> 10559735

Shear bond strength of techniques for bonding esthetic veneers to metal.

H Petridis1, H Hirayama, G Kugel, C Habib, P Garefis.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: New composites with improved qualities have been introduced to the dental profession as alternatives to porcelain. There is concern about the strength and reliability of new metal-resin bonding systems when these composites are used as esthetic veneers over metal frameworks.
PURPOSE: This in vitro study compared the shear bond strength of 2 metal-resin bonding techniques with the bond strength of conventional porcelain fused-to-metal (PFM). Effects of water storage and thermocycling were also evaluated.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety disks, cast in a medium gold, high noble PFM alloy, were divided equally into 6 groups, and received 3 treatments for veneering: conventional feldspathic porcelain on 1 group, and a composite (Artglass) bonded to the metal, using 2 metal-resin bonding techniques. Specimens were tested in shear, half of them after a 24-hour dry storage at room temperature and the rest after 10-day storage in normal saline solution at 37 degrees C and thermocycling. Fractured specimens were evaluated under x10 magnification to determine the nature of failure. Statistical analysis was performed with 2-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA).
RESULTS: Mean shear bond strength values before and after wet storage and thermocycling were 29.66 and 22.91 MPa for the PFM group; 21.43 and 17.92 MPa for the Siloc group; and 19.34 and 15.64 for the etched group, respectively. The PFM group exhibited significantly higher bond strength values compared with the other 2 groups (P<.001). All groups showed a significant decrease in bond strength values after wet storage and thermocycling (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Wet storage and thermocycling caused a significant decrease in shear bond strength of all specimens. Shear bond strength of conventional feldspathic PFM was significantly higher than that of the 2 metal-resin bonding techniques tested. The 2 latter techniques did not reveal any statistically significant differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10559735     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70062-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  4 in total

1.  Shear bond strength of composite veneers and acrylic veneer bonded to ni-cr alloy: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Manish Katyayan; Preeti Katyayan; K Ravishankar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2011-06-04

2.  Shear bond strength of composite resin to titanium according to various surface treatments.

Authors:  Seung-Yun Lee; Mong-Sook Vang; Hong-So Yang; Sang-Won Park; Ha-Ok Park; Hyun-Pil Lim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Evaluation of two dual-functional primers and a tribochemical surface modification system applied to the bonding of an indirect composite resin to metals.

Authors:  Hiroaki Yanagida; Naomi Tanoue; Takako Ide; Hideo Matsumura
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  The zirconia ceramic: strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  Elie E Daou
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-04-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.