Literature DB >> 22653694

The value of daily fetal heart rate home monitoring in addition to serial ultrasound examinations in pregnancies complicated by fetal gastroschisis.

M Kuleva1, L J Salomon, G Benoist, Y Ville, Y Dumez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To audit the practice of daily fetal heart rate home monitoring (FHM) in pregnancies complicated by fetal gastroschisis (GS).
METHODS: Prenatal records and pregnancy outcome were reviewed of all cases with fetal GS between 1999 and 2010, managed with a consistent protocol, which included weekly fetal cardiotocography and ultrasound examinations after 30 weeks, and option of daily FHM. Data were collected including gestational age (GA) at FHM and the presence of fetal heart rate anomaly. Follow-up included fetal growth, amniotic fluid volume, gastrointestinal appearance and cardiotocography findings.
RESULTS: One hundred five cases of GS were identified. Stillbirth rate was 1.9% (2/105). FHM was performed in 97/105 (92.4%) cases. Abnormal FHM was recorded in 24 cases. Fetuses with abnormal versus normal FHM were more likely to have C-section for fetal heart rate anomaly (50% vs 24%, p=0.025) at an earlier gestational age (34.9 ± 1.7 vs 35.8 ± 1.4 weeks, p=0.016). There was no difference in Apgar score or umbilical artery pH at birth.
CONCLUSION: Fetal heart rate abnormalities are frequent in fetuses with GS. FHM appears useful in detecting fetal distress necessitating expedited delivery. However, the impact of a daily FHM policy on neonatal outcome should be evaluated in a randomized study.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22653694     DOI: 10.1002/pd.3903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  4 in total

1.  Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2012-2016: A focus on abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  Erin B Stallings; Jennifer L Isenburg; Tyiesha D Short; Dominique Heinke; Russell S Kirby; Paul A Romitti; Mark A Canfield; Leslie A O'Leary; Rebecca F Liberman; Nina E Forestieri; Wendy N Nembhard; Theresa Sandidge; Eirini Nestoridi; Jason L Salemi; Amy E Nance; Kirstan Duckett; Glenda M Ramirez; Xiaoyi Shan; Jing Shi; Philip J Lupo
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Risk of Stillbirth for Fetuses With Specific Birth Defects.

Authors:  Dominique Heinke; Eirini Nestoridi; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Paige L Williams; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Angela E Lin; Carla M Van Bennekom; Allen A Mitchell; Wendy N Nembhard; Ruth C Fretts; Drucilla J Roberts; C Wes Duke; Suzan L Carmichael; Mahsa M Yazdy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 3.  Effectiveness of Telemonitoring in Obstetrics: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Dorien Lanssens; Thijs Vandenberk; Inge M Thijs; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Midwives', Obstetricians', and Recently Delivered Mothers' Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey.

Authors:  Dorien Lanssens; Thijs Vandenberk; Joy Lodewijckx; Tessa Peeters; Valerie Storms; Inge M Thijs; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.