BACKGROUND: The Thai phase 3 HIV vaccine trial RV 144 showed modest efficacy of a vaccine against HIV acquisition. Baseline variables of age, sex, marital status, and risk did not modify vaccine efficacy. We did a post-hoc analysis of the trial's data to investigate behavioural risk and efficacy every 6 months after vaccination. METHODS: RV 144 was a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial testing the combination of the HIV vaccines ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) and AIDSVAX B/E to prevent HIV infection or reduce setpoint viral load. Male and female volunteers aged 18-30 years were recruited from the community. In this post-hoc analysis of the modified intention-to-treat population (16,395 participants), HIV risk behaviour was assessed with a self-administered questionnaire at the time of initial vaccination in the trial and every 6 months thereafter for 3 years. We classified participants' behaviour as low, medium, or high risk. Both the acquisition endpoint and the early viral-load endpoint were examined for interactions with risk status over time and temporal effects after vaccination. Multiple proportional hazards regression models with treatment and time-varying risk covariates were analysed. FINDINGS:Risk of acquisition of HIV was low in each risk group, but 9187 (58·2%) participants reported higher-risk behaviour at least once during the study. Participants classified as high or increasing risk at least once during follow-up were compared with those who maintained low-risk or medium-risk behaviour as a time-varying covariate, and the interaction of risk status and acquisition efficacy was significant (p=0·01), with greater benefit in low-risk individuals. Vaccine efficacy seemed to peak early--cumulative vaccine efficacy was estimated to be 60·5% (95% CI 22-80) through the 12 months after initial vaccination--and declined quickly. Vaccination did not seem to affect viral load in either early or late infections. INTERPRETATION: Future HIV vaccine trials should recognise potential interactions between challenge intensity and risk heterogeneity in both population and treatment effects. The regimen tested in the RV 144 phase 3 trial might benefit from extended immunisation schedules. FUNDING: US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command and Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Thai phase 3 HIV vaccine trial RV 144 showed modest efficacy of a vaccine against HIV acquisition. Baseline variables of age, sex, marital status, and risk did not modify vaccine efficacy. We did a post-hoc analysis of the trial's data to investigate behavioural risk and efficacy every 6 months after vaccination. METHODS: RV 144 was a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial testing the combination of the HIV vaccines ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521) and AIDSVAX B/E to prevent HIV infection or reduce setpoint viral load. Male and female volunteers aged 18-30 years were recruited from the community. In this post-hoc analysis of the modified intention-to-treat population (16,395 participants), HIV risk behaviour was assessed with a self-administered questionnaire at the time of initial vaccination in the trial and every 6 months thereafter for 3 years. We classified participants' behaviour as low, medium, or high risk. Both the acquisition endpoint and the early viral-load endpoint were examined for interactions with risk status over time and temporal effects after vaccination. Multiple proportional hazards regression models with treatment and time-varying risk covariates were analysed. FINDINGS: Risk of acquisition of HIV was low in each risk group, but 9187 (58·2%) participants reported higher-risk behaviour at least once during the study. Participants classified as high or increasing risk at least once during follow-up were compared with those who maintained low-risk or medium-risk behaviour as a time-varying covariate, and the interaction of risk status and acquisition efficacy was significant (p=0·01), with greater benefit in low-risk individuals. Vaccine efficacy seemed to peak early--cumulative vaccine efficacy was estimated to be 60·5% (95% CI 22-80) through the 12 months after initial vaccination--and declined quickly. Vaccination did not seem to affect viral load in either early or late infections. INTERPRETATION: Future HIV vaccine trials should recognise potential interactions between challenge intensity and risk heterogeneity in both population and treatment effects. The regimen tested in the RV 144 phase 3 trial might benefit from extended immunisation schedules. FUNDING: US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command and Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health.
Authors: Dennis R Burton; Ronald C Desrosiers; Robert W Doms; Mark B Feinberg; Robert C Gallo; Beatrice Hahn; James A Hoxie; Eric Hunter; Bette Korber; Alan Landay; Michael M Lederman; Judy Lieberman; Joseph M McCune; John P Moore; Neal Nathanson; Louis Picker; Douglas Richman; Charles Rinaldo; Mario Stevenson; David I Watkins; Steven M Wolinsky; Jerome A Zack Journal: Science Date: 2004-01-16 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Koen K A Van Rompay; Kristina Abel; Jonathan R Lawson; Raman P Singh; Kimberli A Schmidt; Thomas Evans; Patricia Earl; Danielle Harvey; Genoveffa Franchini; James Tartaglia; David Montefiori; Shilpa Hattangadi; Bernard Moss; Marta L Marthas Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Deborah Lee; Barney S Graham; Ya-Lin Chiu; Peter B Gilbert; M Juliana McElrath; Robert B Belshe; Susan P Buchbinder; Haynes W Sheppard; Beryl A Koblin; Kenneth H Mayer; Michael C Keefer; Mark J Mulligan; Connie L Celum Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2004-07-29 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Martin Fisher; Paul Benn; Barry Evans; Anton Pozniak; Mike Jones; Suzie Maclean; Oliver Davidson; Jack Summerside; David Hawkins Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Dan H Barouch; Jinyan Liu; Hualin Li; Lori F Maxfield; Peter Abbink; Diana M Lynch; M Justin Iampietro; Adam SanMiguel; Michael S Seaman; Guido Ferrari; Donald N Forthal; Ilnour Ourmanov; Vanessa M Hirsch; Angela Carville; Keith G Mansfield; Donald Stablein; Maria G Pau; Hanneke Schuitemaker; Jerald C Sadoff; Erik A Billings; Mangala Rao; Merlin L Robb; Jerome H Kim; Mary A Marovich; Jaap Goudsmit; Nelson L Michael Journal: Nature Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ted Westling; Michal Juraska; Kelly E Seaton; Georgia D Tomaras; Peter B Gilbert; Holly Janes Journal: Stat Methods Med Res Date: 2019-01-09 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Robert J O'Connell; Jean-Louis Excler; Victoria R Polonis; Silvia Ratto-Kim; Josephine Cox; Linda L Jagodzinski; Michelle Liu; Lindsay Wieczorek; John G McNeil; Raphaelle El-Habib; Nelson L Michael; Bruce L Gilliam; Robert Paris; Thomas C VanCott; Georgia D Tomaras; Deborah L Birx; Merlin L Robb; Jerome H Kim Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Nicos Karasavvas; Erik Billings; Mangala Rao; Constance Williams; Susan Zolla-Pazner; Robert T Bailer; Richard A Koup; Sirinan Madnote; Duangnapa Arworn; Xiaoying Shen; Georgia D Tomaras; Jeffrey R Currier; Mike Jiang; Craig Magaret; Charla Andrews; Raphael Gottardo; Peter Gilbert; Timothy J Cardozo; Supachai Rerks-Ngarm; Sorachai Nitayaphan; Punnee Pitisuttithum; Jaranit Kaewkungwal; Robert Paris; Kelli Greene; Hongmei Gao; Sanjay Gurunathan; Jim Tartaglia; Faruk Sinangil; Bette T Korber; David C Montefiori; John R Mascola; Merlin L Robb; Barton F Haynes; Viseth Ngauy; Nelson L Michael; Jerome H Kim; Mark S de Souza Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 2.205