Literature DB >> 22652131

[Vacuum assisted closure in open abdomen and deferred closure: experience in 23 patients].

Lucinda Pérez Domínguez1, Hermelinda Pardellas Rivera, Nieves Cáceres Alvarado, Angel López Saco, Angel Rivo Vázquez, Enrique Casal Núñez.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We analyse our experience and the results obtained with the use of vacuum assisted closure (VAC(®), KCI Clinic Spain SL) in the management of open abdomen.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the laparostomies performed between June 2006 and March 2011 using VAC(®) treatment in the Hospital Xeral-Cíes, Vigo.
RESULTS: We included 23 consecutive patients (18 males and 5 females) on whom the VAC(®) was used in the open abdomen due to different indications (abdominal trauma, peritonitis, pancreatitis, ischaemic disease or abdominal compartmental syndrome). The VAC(®) needed changing a mean of 3.1 times per patient (range 1-7), with total mean treatment duration of 14.8 days (2-43) until closure, primary closure being achieved in 18 out of 21 patients (86%). The mean hospital stay was 110.1 days (8-163) and 6 patients (26%) died during their hospital stay due to problems related to their underlying disease. Seven cases (30%) had complications during the VAC® therapy: 3 intra-abdominal abscesses (13%), 4 fistulas or suture dehiscence (17%), and 1 evisceration (4%).
CONCLUSIONS: VAC(®) therapy is simple to manage, with an acceptable rate of complication, particularly of intestinal fistulas, and a reduced mortality. Of the various systems available for the deferred closure of the abdomen, the VAC(®) has made considerable progress in the past few years, mainly due to its adaptable material, and its numerous advantages. Its use will possibly increase in the future.
Copyright © 2011 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22652131     DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cir Esp        ISSN: 0009-739X            Impact factor:   1.653


  4 in total

Review 1.  EHS clinical guidelines on the management of the abdominal wall in the context of the open or burst abdomen.

Authors:  M López-Cano; J M García-Alamino; S A Antoniou; D Bennet; U A Dietz; F Ferreira; R H Fortelny; P Hernandez-Granados; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; F Muysoms; J A Pereira; R Schwab; N Slater; A Vanlander; G H Van Ramshorst; F Berrevoet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.

Authors:  J J Atema; S L Gans; M A Boermeester
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Successful treatment of enteroatmospheric fistulas in combination with negative pressure wound therapy: Experience on 3 cases and literature review.

Authors:  Ulrich Wirth; Bernhard W Renz; Dorian Andrade; Tobias S Schiergens; Helmut Arbogast; Joachim Andrassy; Jens Werner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  The role of open abdomen in non-trauma patient: WSES Consensus Paper.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Giulia Montori; Marco Ceresoli; Fausto Catena; Ernest E Moore; Rao Ivatury; Walter Biffl; Andrew Peitzman; Raul Coimbra; Sandro Rizoli; Yoram Kluger; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Massimo Sartelli; Marc De Moya; George Velmahos; Gustavo Pereira Fraga; Bruno M Pereira; Ari Leppaniemi; Marja A Boermeester; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Ron Maier; Miklosh Bala; Boris Sakakushev; Vladimir Khokha; Manu Malbrain; Vanni Agnoletti; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Michael Sugrue; Salomone Di Saverio; Ewen Griffiths; Kjetil Soreide; John E Mazuski; Addison K May; Philippe Montravers; Rita Maria Melotti; Michele Pisano; Francesco Salvetti; Gianmariano Marchesi; Tino M Valetti; Thomas Scalea; Osvaldo Chiara; Jeffry L Kashuk; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.469

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.