RATIONALE: The immune response in sepsis is characterized by overt immune dysfunction. Studies indicate immunostimulation represents a viable therapy for patients. One study suggests a potentially protective role for interleukin 5 (IL-5) in sepsis; however, the loss of eosinophils in this disease presents a paradox. OBJECTIVES: To assess the protective and eosinophil-independent effects of IL-5 in sepsis. METHODS: We assessed the effects of IL-5 administration on survival, bacterial burden, and cytokine production after polymicrobial sepsis. In addition, we examined the effects on macrophage phagocytosis and survival using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Loss of IL-5 increased mortality and tissue damage in the lung, IL-6 and IL-10 production, and bacterial burden during sepsis. Therapeutic administration of IL-5 improved mortality in sepsis. Interestingly, IL-5 administration resulted in neutrophil recruitment in vivo. IL-5 overexpression in the absence of eosinophils resulted in decreased mortality from sepsis and increased circulating neutrophils and monocytes, suggesting their importance in the protective effects of IL-5. Furthermore, novel data demonstrate IL-5 receptor expression on neutrophils and monocytes in sepsis. IL-5 augmented cytokine secretion, activation, phagocytosis, and survival of macrophages. Importantly, macrophage depletion before the onset of sepsis eliminated IL-5-mediated protection. The protective effects of IL-5 were confirmed in humans, where IL-5 levels were elevated in patients with sepsis. Moreover, neutrophils and monocytes from patients expressed the IL-5 receptor. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data support a novel role for IL-5 on noneosinophilic myeloid populations, and suggest treatment with IL-5 may be a viable therapy for sepsis.
RATIONALE: The immune response in sepsis is characterized by overt immune dysfunction. Studies indicate immunostimulation represents a viable therapy for patients. One study suggests a potentially protective role for interleukin 5 (IL-5) in sepsis; however, the loss of eosinophils in this disease presents a paradox. OBJECTIVES: To assess the protective and eosinophil-independent effects of IL-5 in sepsis. METHODS: We assessed the effects of IL-5 administration on survival, bacterial burden, and cytokine production after polymicrobial sepsis. In addition, we examined the effects on macrophage phagocytosis and survival using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Loss of IL-5 increased mortality and tissue damage in the lung, IL-6 and IL-10 production, and bacterial burden during sepsis. Therapeutic administration of IL-5 improved mortality in sepsis. Interestingly, IL-5 administration resulted in neutrophil recruitment in vivo. IL-5 overexpression in the absence of eosinophils resulted in decreased mortality from sepsis and increased circulating neutrophils and monocytes, suggesting their importance in the protective effects of IL-5. Furthermore, novel data demonstrate IL-5 receptor expression on neutrophils and monocytes in sepsis. IL-5 augmented cytokine secretion, activation, phagocytosis, and survival of macrophages. Importantly, macrophage depletion before the onset of sepsis eliminated IL-5-mediated protection. The protective effects of IL-5 were confirmed in humans, where IL-5 levels were elevated in patients with sepsis. Moreover, neutrophils and monocytes from patients expressed the IL-5 receptor. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data support a novel role for IL-5 on noneosinophilic myeloid populations, and suggest treatment with IL-5 may be a viable therapy for sepsis.
Authors: Konrad Reinhart; Thomas Glück; Jack Ligtenberg; Klaus Tschaikowsky; Albert Bruining; Jan Bakker; Steven Opal; Lyle L Moldawer; Tim Axtelle; Terence Turner; Sonia Souza; John Pribble Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: James J Lee; Dawn Dimina; MiMi P Macias; Sergei I Ochkur; Michael P McGarry; Katie R O'Neill; Cheryl Protheroe; Ralph Pero; Thanh Nguyen; Stephania A Cormier; Elizabeth Lenkiewicz; Dana Colbert; Lisa Rinaldi; Steven J Ackerman; Charles G Irvin; Nancy A Lee Journal: Science Date: 2004-09-17 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Daniela F Quail; Oakley C Olson; Priya Bhardwaj; Logan A Walsh; Leila Akkari; Marsha L Quick; I-Chun Chen; Nils Wendel; Nir Ben-Chetrit; Jeanne Walker; Peter R Holt; Andrew J Dannenberg; Johanna A Joyce Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Erica L Buonomo; Carrie A Cowardin; Madeline G Wilson; Mahmoud M Saleh; Patcharin Pramoonjago; William A Petri Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Matthew G Drake; Elizabeth R Bivins-Smith; Becky J Proskocil; Zhenying Nie; Gregory D Scott; James J Lee; Nancy A Lee; Allison D Fryer; David B Jacoby Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 6.914