OBJECTIVE: Binding of bacterial cell wall components to CD14 and co-receptors on myeloid cells results in cellular activation and production of proinflammatory mediators. A recombinant anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody (IC14) has been shown to decrease lipopolysaccharide-induced responses in animal and human models of endotoxemia. This study was performed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical pharmacology of IC14 in patients with severe sepsis. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, multiple-center trial. SETTING:Six medical and surgical intensive care units located in Germany and The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Forty patients with severe sepsis. INTERVENTIONS:IC14 was administered intravenously to eight patients/cohort as single (1 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg) or multiple doses (4 mg/kg daily for 4 days, or 4 mg/kg on day 1 followed by 2 mg/kg daily for 3 days). A placebo group (two patients/cohort) was also included. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The overall incidence and types of adverse events were similar among treatment groups. One patient in the group receiving multiple-dose IC14 4 mg/kg daily for 4 days experienced an anaphylactic reaction after receiving the first dose of study drug. IC14 did not induce antibody formation or increase the incidence of secondary bacterial infection. A mean IC14 serum concentration of approximately 1 microg/mL was required to achieve 50% of maximum membrane-bound CD14 receptor occupancy on peripheral blood monocytes. The pattern of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, chemokine, soluble receptor, soluble E-selectin, and acute phase proteins in response to treatment was highly variable by patient and IC14 treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Single and multiple doses of IC14 were generally well tolerated and did not induce antibody formation or increase the incidence of secondary bacterial infection. The results suggest that CD14 blockade with IC14 warrants further clinical investigation to determine its ability to attenuate the proinflammatory response due to infection.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Binding of bacterial cell wall components to CD14 and co-receptors on myeloid cells results in cellular activation and production of proinflammatory mediators. A recombinant anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody (IC14) has been shown to decrease lipopolysaccharide-induced responses in animal and human models of endotoxemia. This study was performed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical pharmacology of IC14 in patients with severe sepsis. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, multiple-center trial. SETTING: Six medical and surgical intensive care units located in Germany and The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Forty patients with severe sepsis. INTERVENTIONS:IC14 was administered intravenously to eight patients/cohort as single (1 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg) or multiple doses (4 mg/kg daily for 4 days, or 4 mg/kg on day 1 followed by 2 mg/kg daily for 3 days). A placebo group (two patients/cohort) was also included. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The overall incidence and types of adverse events were similar among treatment groups. One patient in the group receiving multiple-dose IC14 4 mg/kg daily for 4 days experienced an anaphylactic reaction after receiving the first dose of study drug. IC14 did not induce antibody formation or increase the incidence of secondary bacterial infection. A mean IC14 serum concentration of approximately 1 microg/mL was required to achieve 50% of maximum membrane-bound CD14 receptor occupancy on peripheral blood monocytes. The pattern of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, chemokine, soluble receptor, soluble E-selectin, and acute phase proteins in response to treatment was highly variable by patient and IC14 treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Single and multiple doses of IC14 were generally well tolerated and did not induce antibody formation or increase the incidence of secondary bacterial infection. The results suggest that CD14 blockade with IC14 warrants further clinical investigation to determine its ability to attenuate the proinflammatory response due to infection.
Authors: Kevin P Mollen; Steven C Gribar; Rahul J Anand; David J Kaczorowski; Jeffrey W Kohler; Maria F Branca; Theresa D Dubowski; Chhinder P Sodhi; David J Hackam Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: John K Hermann; Madhumitha Ravikumar; Andrew J Shoffstall; Evon S Ereifej; Kyle M Kovach; Jeremy Chang; Arielle Soffer; Chun Wong; Vishnupriya Srivastava; Patrick Smith; Grace Protasiewicz; Jingle Jiang; Stephen M Selkirk; Robert H Miller; Steven Sidik; Nicholas P Ziats; Dawn M Taylor; Jeffrey R Capadona Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Corinna Lau; Kristin S Gunnarsen; Lene S Høydahl; Jan Terje Andersen; Gøril Berntzen; Anne Pharo; Julie K Lindstad; Judith K Ludviksen; Ole-Lars Brekke; Andreas Barratt-Due; Erik Waage Nielsen; Christopher R Stokes; Terje Espevik; Inger Sandlie; Tom Eirik Mollnes Journal: J Immunol Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 5.422