CONTEXT: Managing and administering medications to relieve pain and symptoms are common, important responsibilities for informal caregivers of patients receiving end-of-life care at home. However, little is known about how hospice providers prepare and support caregivers with medication-related tasks. OBJECTIVES: This qualitative study explores the key approaches that hospice providers use to facilitate medication management for caregivers. METHODS: Semistructured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 22 providers (14 nurses, four physicians, and four social workers) from four hospice organizations around an urban setting in the midwestern U.S. RESULTS: Based on the interviews, the following five key approaches emerged, constituting how the hospice team collectively helped caregivers manage medications: 1) establishing trust; 2) providing information; 3) promoting self-confidence; 4) offering relief (e.g., provided in-home medication assistance, mobilized supportive resources, and simplified prescriptions); and 5) assessing understanding and performance. Each hospice discipline used multiple approaches. Nurses emphasized tailoring information to individual caregivers and patients, providing in-home assistance to help relieve caregivers, and assessing caregivers' understanding and performance of medication management during home visits. Physicians simplified medication prescriptions to alleviate burden and reassured caregivers using their perceived medical authority. Social workers facilitated medication management by providing emotional support to promote self-confidence and mobilizing resources in caregivers' support networks and the community at large. CONCLUSION: Hospice nurses, physicians, and social workers identified distinct, yet overlapping, approaches in aiding caregivers with medication management. These findings emphasize the importance of interdisciplinary teamwork among hospice providers. Future research should investigate how common, standardized, effective, and efficient these approaches are in practice.
CONTEXT: Managing and administering medications to relieve pain and symptoms are common, important responsibilities for informal caregivers of patients receiving end-of-life care at home. However, little is known about how hospice providers prepare and support caregivers with medication-related tasks. OBJECTIVES: This qualitative study explores the key approaches that hospice providers use to facilitate medication management for caregivers. METHODS: Semistructured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 22 providers (14 nurses, four physicians, and four social workers) from four hospice organizations around an urban setting in the midwestern U.S. RESULTS: Based on the interviews, the following five key approaches emerged, constituting how the hospice team collectively helped caregivers manage medications: 1) establishing trust; 2) providing information; 3) promoting self-confidence; 4) offering relief (e.g., provided in-home medication assistance, mobilized supportive resources, and simplified prescriptions); and 5) assessing understanding and performance. Each hospice discipline used multiple approaches. Nurses emphasized tailoring information to individual caregivers and patients, providing in-home assistance to help relieve caregivers, and assessing caregivers' understanding and performance of medication management during home visits. Physicians simplified medication prescriptions to alleviate burden and reassured caregivers using their perceived medical authority. Social workers facilitated medication management by providing emotional support to promote self-confidence and mobilizing resources in caregivers' support networks and the community at large. CONCLUSION: Hospice nurses, physicians, and social workers identified distinct, yet overlapping, approaches in aiding caregivers with medication management. These findings emphasize the importance of interdisciplinary teamwork among hospice providers. Future research should investigate how common, standardized, effective, and efficient these approaches are in practice.
Authors: Holly G Prigerson; Emily Cherlin; Joyce H Chen; Stanislav V Kasl; Rosemary Hurzeler; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Denys T Lau; Rebecca Berman; Leslie Halpern; A Simon Pickard; Robert Schrauf; Whitney Witt Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Debra Parker Oliver; David L Albright; Karla Washington; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Ashley Gage; Megan Mooney; George Demiris Journal: J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care Date: 2013
Authors: Jennifer Tjia; Lee Ellington; Margaret F Clayton; Celeste Lemay; Maija Reblin Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Paula K Baldwin; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Robin L Kruse; George Demiris; Debra Parker Oliver Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: F Amos Bailey; Beverly R Williams; Patricia S Goode; Lesa L Woodby; U Shanette Granstaff; Katharina V Echt; David T Redden; Elizabeth Kvale; Kathryn L Burgio Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Debra Parker Oliver; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Karla Washington; Robin L Kruse; David L Albright; Paula K Baldwin; Amy Boxer; George Demiris Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Patrick M Zueger; Holly M Holmes; Gregory S Calip; Dima M Qato; A Simon Pickard; Todd A Lee Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 6.473