Literature DB >> 22651119

On the independence of data monitoring committee in adaptive design clinical trials.

Shein-Chung Chow1, Ralph Corey, Min Lin.   

Abstract

In clinical trials, an independent data monitoring committee (DMC) is often established to perform both ongoing safety data monitoring and interim efficacy analysis. These evaluations are performed in a blinded fashion in order to avoid possible operational biases that may be introduced to the trial after the review of the data. The DMCs for clinical trials using adaptive design methods are also positioned to implement the adaptation decision according to the prospective adaptation algorithm. While the DMC plays an important role in maintaining the validity and integrity of the intended clinical trial, adaptive design clinical trials trigger a greater role and increased responsibility for the DMC. To assist the sponsor in establishing a DMC, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a draft guidance entitled Establishment and Operation of Clinical Trial Data Monitoring Committees in 2006. In this article, the composition, role/responsibility, and function/activity of a DMC are described. Concerns of the additional responsibilities of the DMC for adaptive design clinical trials are addressed. Although the intention of the DMC is well-intentioned, controversial issues inevitably occur. These controversial issues include, but are not limited to, (1) the challenge of the independence of a DMC and (2) the issue regarding the direct communication between the DMC and the FDA. Discussion of controversial issues and practical issues are also provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22651119     DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2012.676536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  11 in total

1.  The Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design.

Authors:  Munyaradzi Dimairo; Philip Pallmann; James Wason; Susan Todd; Thomas Jaki; Steven A Julious; Adrian P Mander; Christopher J Weir; Franz Koenig; Marc K Walton; Jon P Nicholl; Elizabeth Coates; Katie Biggs; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Michael A Proschan; John A Scott; Yuki Ando; Daniel Hind; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-06-17

2.  Creative trial design in RA: optimizing patient outcomes.

Authors:  Maya H Buch; Sue Pavitt; Mahesh Parmar; Paul Emery
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Data monitoring committees: Promoting best practices to address emerging challenges.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming; David L DeMets; Matthew T Roe; Janet Wittes; Karim A Calis; Amit N Vora; Alan Meisel; Raymond P Bain; Marvin A Konstam; Michael J Pencina; David J Gordon; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Charles H Hennekens; James D Neaton; Gail D Pearson; Tomas Lg Andersson; Marc A Pfeffer; Susan S Ellenberg
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Overview, hurdles, and future work in adaptive designs: perspectives from a National Institutes of Health-funded workshop.

Authors:  Christopher S Coffey; Bruce Levin; Christina Clark; Cate Timmerman; Janet Wittes; Peter Gilbert; Sara Harris
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 5.  Adaptive design clinical trials: a review of the literature and ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Laura E Bothwell; Jerry Avorn; Nazleen F Khan; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Sharing interim trial results by the Data Safety Monitoring Board with those responsible for the trial's conduct and progress: a narrative review.

Authors:  Victoria Borg Debono; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them.

Authors:  Philip Pallmann; Alun W Bedding; Babak Choodari-Oskooei; Munyaradzi Dimairo; Laura Flight; Lisa V Hampson; Jane Holmes; Adrian P Mander; Lang'o Odondi; Matthew R Sydes; Sofía S Villar; James M S Wason; Christopher J Weir; Graham M Wheeler; Christina Yap; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  The adaptive designs CONSORT extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design.

Authors:  Munyaradzi Dimairo; Philip Pallmann; James Wason; Susan Todd; Thomas Jaki; Steven A Julious; Adrian P Mander; Christopher J Weir; Franz Koenig; Marc K Walton; Jon P Nicholl; Elizabeth Coates; Katie Biggs; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Michael A Proschan; John A Scott; Yuki Ando; Daniel Hind; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  How can health economics be used in the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials? A qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Laura Flight; Steven Julious; Alan Brennan; Susan Todd; Daniel Hind
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Adding flexibility to clinical trial designs: an example-based guide to the practical use of adaptive designs.

Authors:  Thomas Burnett; Pavel Mozgunov; Philip Pallmann; Sofia S Villar; Graham M Wheeler; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.