| Literature DB >> 22649475 |
Ching-Ling Kao1, Chao-Hsun Chen, Wei-Yun Lin, Yu-Ching Chiao, Ching-Liang Hsieh.
Abstract
We tested effects of auricular acupressure on peri- and early postmenopausal women with anxiety (PPWA). Fifty PPWA were randomly assigned to the auricular acupressure group (AG) or the sham group (SG). After 3 meals and before sleep every day for 4 weeks, the AG received auricular acupressure on the bilateral ear shenmen and subcortex points for 3 min per point on alternating ears. The SG received sham auricular acupressure. The Alprazolam was reduced from 0.5 mg/day at baseline to 0.3 mg/day 4 weeks after auricular acupressure (4 W) in the AG (P < .05) whereas maintained at 0.5 mg/day in the SG (P > .05). The Zolpidem was reduced from 3.0 mg/day at baseline to 1.5 mg/day at 4 W (P < .05) whereas was reduced from 2.4 mg/day to 1.9 mg/day at 4 W in the SG (P > .05), thus, significant tapering medication, suggesting auricular acupressure is helpful to PPWA.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22649475 PMCID: PMC3358095 DOI: 10.1155/2012/567639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Standards for reporting interventions in clinical trials of acupuncture (STRICTA 2010).
| Acupoint rationale | (1) According to meridian theory of traditional Chinese medicine. |
|
| |
| Acupressure detail | (1) Bilateral ear acupoints. |
|
| |
| Treatment regimen | (1) Four times (after 3 meals and before bedtime) every day for 4 weeks. |
|
| |
| Cointerventions | (1) None of herbs, moxibustion, cupping, massage, exercise, advice dietary or lifestyle modification. |
|
| |
| Practitioner background | (1) License-certificated Chinese medical doctor with more than eight years of acupuncture experience. |
|
| |
| Control intervention | (1) Nil. |
Figure 1Flowchart.
Demographic characteristics at baseline.
| AG ( | SG ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 53.56 ± 4.63 | 54.42 ± 6.42 | .607t |
| Education (years) | 8.92 ± 3.71 | 9.47 ± 4.58 | .660t |
| Parity | 2.71 ± 1.31 | 3.12 ± 1.36 | .360t |
| Menarche (years) | 14.25 ± 1.77 | 13.67 ± 1.24 | .267t |
| Marital status | .179c | ||
| Married | 24 (96%) | 17 (89.5%) | |
| Single | 1 (4%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Divorced | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (10.5%) | |
| Menopausal status | .986c | ||
| Perimenopause | 5 (20.9%) | 4 (21.1%) | |
| Post-menopause | 19 (79.1%) | 15 (78.9%) | |
| FSH | 58.7 ± 28.2 | 66.2 ± 35.6 | .45t |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). AG: auricular acupressure group; SG: sham group; FSH: follicle stimulating hormone;
t: Student's t-test; c: Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
Influencing factors at baseline.
| AG ( | SG ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prior use of hormone | 9 (36%) | 13 (68.4%) | .03 |
| Herbal medicine | 11 (44%) | 4 (21%) | .11 |
| Smoking habit | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | .38 |
| Alcohol habit | 1 (4%) | 0 (0%) | .38 |
| Caffeine habit | 6 (24%) | 2 (11%) | .23 |
| BSRS | 7.6 ± 4.1 | 8.0 ± 3.2 | .76t |
AG: auricular acupressure group; SG: sham group; BSRS: Brief Symptom Rating Scale. t: Student's t-test.
Effect of auricular acupressure on peri-menopausal and early postmenopausal women with anxiety.
| AG ( | SG ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 4 W | Baseline | 4 W | |
| HAMA | 17.8 (6.2)a | 8.0 (5.5)a,b | 19.6 (5.5) | 11.0 (6.3)b |
| MRS | 11.8 (5.9)a | 6.4 (5.8)a,b | 14.5 (6.1) | 8.2 (4.9)b |
| CGI-S | 3.8 (0.7)a | 2.3 (0.9)a,b | 4.1 (0.7) | 2.7 (1.0)b |
| CGI-I | 4.4 (0.5)a | 2.0 (0.9)a,b | 4.5 (0.5) | 2.6 (1.1)b |
| Alprazolam | 0.5 (0.4)a | 0.3 (0.3)a,b | 0.5 (0.6) | 0.5 (0.6)c |
| Zolpidem | 3.0 (4.0)a | 1.5 (3.1)a,b | 2.4 (2.6) | 1.9 (3.4)c |
AG: auricular acupressure group; SG: sham group; Baseline: prior to auricular acupressure; 4 W: at 4 week after auricular acupressure; HAMA: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; MRS: Menopause Rating Scale; CGI-S: Clinical Global Impression-Severity; CGI-I: Clinical Global Impression-Improvement; aNo significant difference between AG and SG groups (P > .05). bSignificant difference between baseline and 4 W (P ≤ .05). cNo significant difference between baseline and 4 W (P > .05).
Effect of auricular acupressure on subscores of SF-36 in peri-menopausal and early postmenopausal women with anxiety.
| AG ( | SG ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 4 Ws | Baseline | 4 W | |
| PF | 80.2 (15.0)a | 87.8 (14.9)a,b | 73.4 (21.9) | 79.7 (20.8)c |
| RP | 59.0 (42.6)a | 75.0 (36.1)a,c | 46.1 (47.3) | 75.0 (37.3)b |
| RE | 52.0 (44.2)a | 68.0 (41.4)a,c | 49.1 (43.6) | 82.5 (32.1)b |
| VT | 54.6 (22.4)a | 65.2 (19.6)a,b | 49.2 (20.6) | 61.3 (20.7)b |
| MH | 54.4 (18.4)a | 65.3 (19.4)a,b | 50.7 (15.5) | 64.4 (16.6)b |
| SF | 73.0 (19.3)a | 79.0 (17.2)a,c | 68.4 (19.7) | 76.3 (16.6)c |
| BP | 69.1 (15.7)a | 76.7 (13.5)a,b | 60.7 (14.2) | 73.8 (19.7)b |
| GH | 45.8 (16.8)a | 62.2 (22.1)a,b | 36.6 (19.6) | 55.8 (23.2)b |
AG: auricular acupressure group; SG: sham group; Baseline: prior to auricular acupressure; 4 W: at 4 week after auricular acupressure; SF-36: Short Form Health Survey; PF: physical function; SF: social function; RP: role limitations due to physical problems; RE: role limitations due to emotional problems; MH: mental health; VT: energy/vitality; BP: body pain; GH: general perception of health; aNo significant difference between AG and SG groups (P > .05). bSignificant difference between baseline and 4 W (P ≤ .05). cNo significant difference between baseline and 4 W (P > .05).