| Literature DB >> 23890176 |
Weidong Pan1, Shin Kwak2, Guoyan Li3, Yiyun Chen4, Dingfang Cai5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of add-on Yang-Xue-Qing-Nao granules (YXQN) on sleep dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23890176 PMCID: PMC3733743 DOI: 10.1186/1749-8546-8-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med ISSN: 1749-8546 Impact factor: 5.455
Subject characteristics
| Age (yr) | 66.8 ± 7.7 | 67.1 ± 10.2 | 68.6 ± 9.2 | 0.89 |
| Men/Women | 21/14 | 19/11 | 18/13 | - |
| Disease duration | - | 6.1 ± 4.9 | 5.9 ± 4.7 | 0.17 |
| UPDRS score | - | 37.59 ± 10.51 | 38.35 ± 6.78 | 0.23 |
| Levodopa/DCI (mg/day) | - | 412.5 ± 162.8 | 421.3 ± 142.9 | 0.65 |
| Pramipexole(mg/day) | - | 1.11 ± 0.39 | 1.03 ± 0.78 | 0.08 |
| Entacapone (mg/day) | - | 198.28 ± 88.47 | 203.67 ± 78.38 | 0.12 |
| Selegiline hydrochloride (mg/day) | - | 8.33 ± 6.94 | 8.21 ± 3.76 | 0.26 |
| Adamantatamine (mg/day) | - | 118.73 ± 96.59 | 116.31 ± 89.6 | 0.19 |
| Artane hydrochloride (mg/day) | - | 4.82 ± 2.91 | 4.65 ± 2.36 | 0.08 |
Figure 1Daily profiles of actigraph counts showing the biological rhythm before and after granule ingestion in the control group (A), placebo group (B), and granule (YXQN) group (C). The light green color indicates sleep duration.
Figure 2Mean changes in values of detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) in diurnal activity (DA) value (A), evening activity (EA) value (B), diurnal activity (DA) value (C) and Parkinson’s disease sleep scale (PDSS) score (D) at baseline, and at weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16. Black circles indicate the Yang-Xue Qing-Nao granule (YXQN) group, white circles indicate the placebo group and white squares indicate the control group. *P < 0.05, vs. baseline; ☆P < 0.05, vs. placebo group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, vs. YXQN group or placebo group.
Changes in detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) values, Parkinson’s disease sleep scale (PDSS) and unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS)
| α value of DA | | | | |
| Week 8 | −0.9 [−1.1 to −0.7] | −0.2 [−0.3 to 0.1] | −0.7 [−1.0 to −0.8] | 0.056 |
| Week 12 | −1.0 [−1.2 to −0.7] | −0.1 [−0.3 to 0.2] | −0.8 [−1.1 to −0.7] | 0.051 |
| Week 16 | −0.9 [−1.1 to −0.6] | −0.2 [−0.2 to 0.3] | −0.9 [−1.1 to −0.7] | 0.072 |
| α value of EA | | | | |
| Week 8 | −1.1 [−1.4 to −0.6] | −0.1 [−0.1 to 0.2] | −1.0 [−1.3 to −0.5] | 0.048 |
| Week 12 | −0.9 [−1.0 to −0.6]* | 0.1 [−0.3 to 0.4] | −1.1 [−1.6 to −0.7] | 0.036 |
| Week 16 | −0.9 [−1.1 to −0.7]* | −0.2 [−0.4 to 0.3] | −0.9 [−1.3 to −0.8] | 0.041 |
| α value of NA | | | | |
| Week 8 | 1.0 [0.8 to 1.6]* | −0.3 [−0.6 to 0.4] | 1.1 [0.7 to 1.5] | 0.017 |
| Week 12 | 1.1 [0.7 to 1.5]* | −0.1 [−0.5 to 0.5] | 1.0 [0.6 to 1.4] | 0.038 |
| Week 16 | 0.9 [0.6 to 1.7]* | −0.2 [−0.5 to 0.4] | 0.9 [0.7 to 1.6] | 0.042 |
| PDSS score | | | | |
| Week 8 | 12.1 [7.6 to 13.7]* | 2.9 [−4.1 to 9.7] | 10.7 [6.9 to 16.5] | 0.026 |
| Week 12 | 11.9 [7.1 to 14.2]* | 3.3 [−6.6 to 7.3] | 9.8 [8.7 to 15.9] | 0.029 |
| Week 16 | 9.8 [7.0 to 14.6]* | 3.2 [−4.9 to 5.1] | 9.9 [7.4 to 17.6] | 0.048 |
| UPDRS score | | | | |
| Week 8 | −6.6 [−11.4 to −2.8] | −1.7 [−2.8 to 3.9] | −4.9 [−6.7 to −2.7] | 0.076 |
| Week 12 | −5.7 [−10.8 to −1.9] | −0.9 [−1.7 to 2.1] | −5.1 [−8.3 to −2.4] | 0.069 |
| Week 16 | −5.2 [−8.9 to −2.1] | 2.1 [−4.2 to 6.1] | −4.6 [−7.5 to −3.1] | 0.153 |
*: P < 0.05, compared with baseline.