| Literature DB >> 22649471 |
Zahra A Amin1, Mehmet Bilgen, Mohammed A Alshawsh, Hapipah M Ali, A Hamid A Hadi, Mahmood A Abdulla.
Abstract
A preclinical study was performed to determine if the extract from Phyllanthus niruri (PN) plays a protective role against liver cirrhosis induced by thioacetamide (TAA) in rats. Initially, acute toxicity was tested and the results showed that the extract was benign when applied to healthy rats. Next, the therapeutic effect of the extract was investigated using five groups of rats: control, TAA, silymarin, and PN high dose and low dose groups. Significant differences were observed between the TAA group and the other groups regarding body and liver weights, liver biochemical parameters, total antioxidant capacity, lipid peroxidation, and oxidative stress enzyme levels. Gross visualization indicated coarse granules on the surface of the hepatotoxic rats' livers, in contrast to the smoother surface in the livers of the silymarin and PN-treated rats. Histopathological analysis revealed necrosis, lymphocytes infiltration in the centrilobular region, and fibrous connective tissue proliferation in the livers of the hepatotoxic rats. But, the livers of the treated rats had comparatively minimal inflammation and normal lobular architecture. Silymarin and PN treatments effectively restored these measurements closer to their normal levels. Progression of liver cirrhosis induced by TAA in rats can be intervened using the PN extract and these effects are comparable to those of silymarin.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22649471 PMCID: PMC3357973 DOI: 10.1155/2012/241583
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Effects of 2 g/kg and 5 g/kg PN ethanol extract on liver biochemical parameters.
| Groups | ALT (IU/L) | AST (IU/L) | ALP (IU/L) | Total protein (g/L) | Albumin (g/L) | Total bilirubin ( | G-glutamyl transferase (IU/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tween 20 (10%) | 45.00 ± 5.32 | 27.00 ± 4.16 | 97.67 ± 13.86 | 73.00 ± 2.96 | 44.17 ± 2.59 | 10.17 ± 2.26 | 58.17 ± 9.90 |
| PN extract (2 g/kg) | 49.67 ± 4.60 | 26.33 ± 3.22 | 92.67 ± 9.76 | 74.50 ± 2.31 | 42.83 ± 1.97 | 8.00 ± 1.06 | 37.67 ± 6.82 |
| PN extract (5 g/kg) | 45.17 ± 5.30 | 28.00 ± 3.65 | 78.33 ± 6.81 | 74.33 ± 2.72 | 42.50 ± 2.93 | 9.50 ± 1.69 | 55.00 ± 8.83 |
Values were expressed as mean ± S.E.M. There are no statistically significant differences between the measurements in different groups. The significant value was set at P < 0.05.
Effects of 2 g/kg and 5 g/kg PN ethanol extract on kidney biochemical parameters.
| Groups | Sodium (mmol/L) | Potassium (mmol/L) | Chloride (mmol/L) | CO2 (mmol/L) | Anion gap (mmol/L) | Urea (mmol/L) | Creatinine ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tween 20 (10%) | 141.33 ± 1.59 | 4.33 ± 0.27 | 102.83 ± 1.05 | 26.83 ± 1.72 | 14.33 ± 1.75 | 4.60 ± 0.70 | 37.33 ± 0.18 |
| PN extract (2 g/kg) | 140.00 ± 1.77 | 4.37 ± 0.30 | 103.17 ± 1.45 | 26.33 ± 1.59 | 13.00 ± 1.44 | 4.57 ± 0.70 | 37.60 ± 0.19 |
| PN extract (5 g/kg) | 137.17 ± 1.14 | 4.42 ± 2.39 | 102.67 ± 0.99 | 22.17 ± 0.60 | 17.83 ± 1.45 | 4.73 ± 0.67 | 37.52 ± 0.11 |
Values were expressed as mean ± S.E.M. There are no statistically significant differences between the measurements in different groups. The significant value was set at P < 0.05.
Body, liver, and spleen weights of the rats in different groups.
| Groups | Body wt. (gm) | Liver wt. (gm) | Liver index (%) | Spleen wt. (gm) | Spleen index (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 237.0 ± 17.24 | 6.2 ± 0.49 | 2.63 ± 0.13 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.02 |
| TAA | 195.4 ± 18.35 | 9.4 ± 0.98 | 4.81 ± 0.23a | 0.51 ± 0.10 | 0.25 ± 0.04 |
| Silymarin | 222.0 ± 12.00 | 9.2 ± 0.97 | 4.10 ± 0.22 | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.24 ± 0.01 |
| PN 100 mg/kg | 258.6 ± 14.02 | 8.2 ± 1.02 | 3.22 ± 0.41b | 0.46 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.02 |
| PN 200 mg/kg | 253.4 ± 16.41 | 7.8 ± 0.58 | 3.18 ± 0.24c | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 0.16 ± 0.01 |
The data were stated as mean ± S.E.M. Means with different superscripts are significantly different. a P < 0.05 versus normal control group, b P < 0.05 versus TAA control group, and c P < .01 versus TAA control group.
Figure 1Images showing the macroscopic appearances of livers from different experimental groups. (Control): regular smooth surface. (Hepatotoxic): iirregular whitish micro- and macronodules and a large area of ductular cholangiocellular proliferation embedded within fibrosis. (Silymarin): smooth surface. (High dose PN): nearly smooth surface.
Figure 2Histopathology images of the livers from different experimental groups. (Control): normal structure and architecture. (TAA): structural damage, necrosis, and pseudolobules with thick fibrotic septa. (Silymarin): mild inflammation but no fibrotic septa. (PN): partially preserved hepatocytes and architecture with small areas of mild necrosis.
Figure 3Standard curve of quantitative estimation of total phenolic content in PN extract.
Effects of TAA, PN, and silymarin on antioxidant enzymes activities.
| Groups | TAC (mM) | CAT (nmol/min/mL) | SOD (U/mL) | MDA ( | GPX (nmol/min/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 7.83 ± 1.47 | 848.3 ± 2.11 | 246.6 ± 4.12 | 30.10 ± 9.09 | 1438.4 ± 1.4 |
| TAA | 4.48 ± 1.54 | 964.9 ± 4.5a | 310.3 ± 10.0a | 59.77 ± 8.41a | 1466.1 ± 2.0 |
| Silymarin | 8.37 ± 0.43b | 839.7 ± 48.3c | 280.2 ± 12.3 | 30.43 ± 2.53c | 1437.8 ± 55.9 |
| PN 100 mg/kg | 6.73 ± 0.21 | 898.3 ± 1.9 | 293.6 ± 29.2 | 37.77 ± 8.35b | 1457.0 ± 36.1 |
| PN 200 mg/kg | 6.72 ± 0.91 | 854.03 ± 15.9c | 287.8 ± 5.55 | 29.10 ± 8.25c | 1451.2 ± 9.4 |
The data were stated as mean ± S.D. Means with different superscripts are significantly different. a P < 0.05 versus normal control group, b P < 0.05 versus TAA control group, and c P < 0.01 versus TAA control group.
Effects of TAA, PN, and silymarin on hepatic biochemical parameters.
| Groups | ALT (IU/L) | AST (IU/L) | ALP (IU/L) | T. protein (g/L) | Bilirubin ( | Albumin (g/L) | GGT (IU/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 66.0 ± 3.63 | 162.6 ± 9.35 | 109.8 ± 10.85 | 72.0 ± 1.16 | 2.0 ± 0.00 | 11.0 ± 0.32 | 8.4 ± 0.40 |
| TAA | 165.6 ± 19.58a | 484.8 ± 103.83a | 431.2 ± 72.94a | 58.80 ± 1.07a | 7.4 ± 1.07a | 8.4 ± 0.22 | 18.4 ± 3.5a |
| Silymarin | 63.0 ± 4.16c | 158.0 ± 16.77c | 86.0 ± 51.45 | 67.20 ± 2.73c | 1.8 ± 0.32c | 10.8 ± 0.73 | 13.3 ± 0.97 |
| PN 100 mg/kg | 82.6 ± 4.10c | 282.2 ± 24.57c | 272.4 ± 17.38c | 70.0 ± 1.00b | 5.2 ± 0.92 | 10.4 ± 0.38 | 15.6 ± 2.25 |
| PN 200 mg/kg | 78.2 ± 6.39c | 180.6 ± 25.86c | 140.2 ± 26.63c | 71.25 ± 0.66c | 3.4 ± 0.37c | 10.7 ± 0.15 | 11.0 ± 1.76 |
All values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Means with different superscripts are significantly different. a P < 0.05 versus normal control group, b P < 0.05 versus TAA control group, and c P < 0.01 versus TAA control group. ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase, GGT: gamma glutamyl transferase.