Literature DB >> 22648664

Women who know their place : sex-based differences in spatial abilities and their evolutionary significance.

Ariane Burke1, Anne Kandler, David Good.   

Abstract

Differences between men and women in the performance of tests designed to measure spatial abilities are explained by evolutionary psychologists in terms of adaptive design. The Hunter-Gatherer Theory of Spatial Ability suggests that the adoption of a hunter-gatherer lifestyle (assuming a sexual division of labor) created differential selective pressure on the development of spatial skills in men and women and, therefore, cognitive differences between the sexes. Here, we examine a basic spatial skill-wayfinding (the ability to plan routes and navigate a landscape)-in men and women in a natural, real-world setting as a means of testing the proposition that sex-based differences in spatial ability exist outside of the laboratory. Our results indicate that when physical differences are accounted for, men and women with equivalent experience perform equally well at complex navigation tasks in a real-world setting. We conclude that experience, gendered patterns of activity, and self-assessment are contributing factors in producing previously reported differences in spatial ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22648664     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-012-9140-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  26 in total

1.  Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory.

Authors:  Albert Postma; Gerry Jager; Roy P C Kessels; Hans P F Koppeschaar; Jack van Honk
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability.

Authors:  Catherine M Jones; Victoria A Braithwaite; Susan D Healy
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Mental rotation and real-world wayfinding.

Authors:  J C Malinowski
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2001-02

4.  Some evidence of a female advantage in object location memory using ecologically valid stimuli.

Authors:  Nick Neave; Colin Hamilton; Lee Hutton; Nicola Tildesley; Anne T Pickering
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2005-06

5.  Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task.

Authors:  N J Sandstrom; J Kaufman; S A Huettel
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1998-04

6.  Development of sex differences in spatial memory.

Authors:  A M Barnfield
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1999-08

7.  Ecologic validity in neuropsychological assessment: prediction of wayfinding.

Authors:  M J Nadolne; A Y Stringer
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts.

Authors:  Patrick Foo; William H Warren; Andrew Duchon; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition.

Authors:  Jing Feng; Ian Spence; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-10

10.  Gender effects in spatial orientation: cognitive profiles and mental strategies.

Authors:  Andrea Bosco; Anna M Longoni; Tomaso Vecchi
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2004-07
View more
  4 in total

1.  Sex Differences in Mobility and Spatial Cognition: A Test of the Fertility and Parental Care Hypothesis in Northwestern Namibia.

Authors:  Layne Vashro; Lace Padilla; Elizabeth Cashdan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-03

2.  Why Go There? Evolution of Mobility and Spatial Cognition in Women and Men : An Introduction to the Special Issue.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cashdan; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-03

3.  Spatial navigation in young versus older adults.

Authors:  Ivana Gazova; Jan Laczó; Eva Rubinova; Ivana Mokrisova; Eva Hyncicova; Ross Andel; Martin Vyhnalek; Katerina Sheardova; Elizabeth J Coulson; Jakub Hort
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  A Mendelian randomization study of testosterone and cognition in men.

Authors:  Jie V Zhao; Tai Hing Lam; Chaoqiang Jiang; Stacey S Cherny; Bin Liu; Kar Keung Cheng; Weisen Zhang; Gabriel M Leung; C Mary Schooling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.