Literature DB >> 22648105

A comparative study of the surgical outcomes of robotic and conventional open modified radical neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis.

Sang-Wook Kang1, So Hee Lee, Jae Hyun Park, Jun Soo Jeong, Seulkee Park, Cho Rok Lee, Jong Ju Jeong, Kee-Hyun Nam, Woong Youn Chung, Cheong Soo Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several endoscopic modified radical neck dissections (MRND) have been conducted since the introduction of the endoscopic technique to thyroid surgery with the aim of avoiding a long cervical scar. Furthermore, the recent introduction of surgical robotic systems has increased the precision of endoscopic techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the early surgical outcomes of robotic and conventional open MRND for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) with lateral neck node metastasis (LNM).
METHODS: From January 2009 to May 2010, 165 patients with PTC underwent bilateral total thyroidectomy with central compartment neck dissection and ipsilateral MRND. Of these patients, 56 formed the robotic procedure group (RG) and 109 the conventional open procedure group. These two groups were retrospectively compared with respect to their clinicopathological characteristics, early surgical outcomes, and surgical completeness.
RESULTS: The operative time was longer, mean tumor size was smaller, mean age was lower, and disease stage was earlier in the RG. However, mean numbers of retrieved lymph nodes were similar in the two groups, and mean hospital stay after surgery was shorter in the RG. Furthermore, complication rates were similar in the two groups, and there was no statistical difference in postoperative Tg levels between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic MRND was found to be similar to conventional open MRND in terms of early surgical outcomes and surgical completeness but leaves no scar on the neck area. Robotic MRND can be viewed as an acceptable alternative method in low-risk PTC with LNM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22648105     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2333-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

1.  Endoscopic thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy by the axillary approach. A preliminary report.

Authors:  Y Ikeda; H Takami; M Niimi; S Kan; Y Sasaki; J Takayama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via an axillary approach: experience of 30 cases.

Authors:  Jong Ho Yoon; Chan Heun Park; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  Robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies using a gasless transaxillary approach.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Kee-Hyun Nam; Hang Seok Chang; Woong Youn Chung; Cheong Soo Park
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Endoscopic thyroidectomy with the da Vinci robot system using the bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA) technique: our initial experience.

Authors:  Kyu Eun Lee; Jaideepraj Rao; Yeo-Kyu Youn
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.719

5.  Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; Seung Chul Lee; So Hee Lee; Kang Young Lee; Jong Ju Jeong; Yong Sang Lee; Kee-Hyun Nam; Hang Seok Chang; Woong Youn Chung; Cheong Soo Park
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Robot assisted transaxillary surgery (RATS) for the removal of thyroid and parathyroid glands.

Authors:  Christine S Landry; Elizabeth G Grubbs; G Stephen Morris; Nadine S Turner; F Christopher Holsinger; Jeffrey E Lee; Nancy D Perrier
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for papillary carcinoma: a prospective study of its completeness.

Authors:  Paolo Miccoli; Rossella Elisei; Gabriele Materazzi; Marco Capezzone; David Galleri; Furio Pacini; Piero Berti; Aldo Pinchera
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy using trans-axillary approach; surgical outcome of 581 patients.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Ji-Sup Yun; Tae Yon Sung; Seung Chul Lee; Yong Sang Lee; Kee-Hyun Nam; Hang Seok Chang; Woong Youn Chung; Cheong Soo Park
Journal:  Endocr J       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 2.349

Review 9.  Papillary thyroid cancer: surgical management of lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Nadine R Caron; Orlo H Clark
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-07

10.  A comparison of surgical outcomes between endoscopic and robotically assisted thyroidectomy: the authors' initial experience.

Authors:  Brian Hung-Hin Lang; Man-Po Chow
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  18 in total

1.  "Scarless" (in the neck) endoscopic thyroidectomy (SET) with ipsilateral levels II, III, and IV dissection via breast approach for papillary thyroid carcinoma: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Haichao Yan; Yong Wang; Ping Wang; Qiuping Xie; Qunzi Zhao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection using a bilateral axillary breast approach with a conventional open procedure after propensity score matching.

Authors:  Se Hyun Paek; Hye Ah Lee; Hyungju Kwon; Kyung Ho Kang; Sung Jun Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Gasless, transaxillary robotic neck dissection: the technique and evidence.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; Min Jhi Kim; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-10

Review 4.  Robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing-Hua Pan; Hong Zhou; Xiao-Xu Zhao; Hui Ding; Li Wei; Li Qin; Yun-Long Pan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Current status of robotic thyroid surgery in South Korea: a web-based survey.

Authors:  Dong Sik Bae; Do Hoon Koo; June Young Choi; Eunyoung Kim; Kyu Eun Lee; Yeo-Kyu Youn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery: as safe as conventional-access thyroid surgery?

Authors:  Henning Dralle
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2013-06

Review 7.  Robotic thyroidectomy and cervical neck dissection for thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Se Hyun Paek; Kyung Ho Kang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-06

8.  Yonsei Experience of 5000 Gasless Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomies.

Authors:  Min Jhi Kim; Kee-Hyun Nam; Seul Gi Lee; Jung Bum Choi; Tae Hyung Kim; Cho Rok Lee; Jandee Lee; Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Transaxillary single-incision robotic neck dissection for metastatic thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-10

10.  Transaxillary robotic modified radical neck dissection: a 5-year assessment of operative and oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Min Jhi Kim; Jandee Lee; Seul Gi Lee; Jung Bum Choi; Tae Hyung Kim; Eun Jeong Ban; Cho Rok Lee; Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Kee-Hyun Nam; Young Suk Jo; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.