The transketolase (TKT) enzyme in Mycobacterium tuberculosis represents a novel drug target for tuberculosis treatment and has low homology with the orthologous human enzyme. Here, we report on the structural and kinetic characterization of the transketolase from M. tuberculosis (TBTKT), a homodimer whose monomers each comprise 700 amino acids. We show that TBTKT catalyses the oxidation of donor sugars xylulose-5-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate as well as the reduction of the acceptor sugar ribose-5-phosphate. An invariant residue of the TKT consensus sequence required for thiamine cofactor binding is mutated in TBTKT; yet its catalytic activities are unaffected, and the 2.5 Å resolution structure of full-length TBTKT provides an explanation for this. Key structural differences between the human and mycobacterial TKT enzymes that impact both substrate and cofactor recognition and binding were uncovered. These changes explain the kinetic differences between TBTKT and its human counterpart, and their differential inhibition by small molecules. The availability of a detailed structural model of TBTKT will enable differences between human and M. tuberculosis TKT structures to be exploited to design selective inhibitors with potential antitubercular activity.
The transketolase (TKT) enzyme in Mycobacterium tuberculosis represents a novel drug target for tuberculosis treatment and has low homology with the orthologous human enzyme. Here, we report on the structural and kinetic characterization of the transketolase from M. tuberculosis (TBTKT), a homodimer whose monomers each comprise 700 amino acids. We show that TBTKT catalyses the oxidation of donorsugarsxylulose-5-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate as well as the reduction of the acceptor sugar ribose-5-phosphate. An invariant residue of the TKT consensus sequence required for thiamine cofactor binding is mutated in TBTKT; yet its catalytic activities are unaffected, and the 2.5 Å resolution structure of full-length TBTKT provides an explanation for this. Key structural differences between the human and mycobacterial TKT enzymes that impact both substrate and cofactor recognition and binding were uncovered. These changes explain the kinetic differences between TBTKT and its human counterpart, and their differential inhibition by small molecules. The availability of a detailed structural model of TBTKT will enable differences between human and M. tuberculosis TKT structures to be exploited to design selective inhibitors with potential antitubercular activity.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the aetiologic agent of tuberculosis
(TB), a disease that is one of the leading causes of death from a single infectious
agent worldwide. The World Health Organization currently estimates that 1.8 billion
people, approximately one-third of the world's population, are infected with
M. tuberculosis, and that there are 9 million new active cases
annually and 2 million deaths each year as a result of infection [1]. TB treatment is complicated,
requiring at least three drugs, of long duration and often accompanied by
side-effects. This has resulted in poor compliance to treatment regimens that, in
turn, have contributed to the emergence of numerous multi-drug-resistant (MDR) and
extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains that further complicate the therapy. In the
case of XDR TB, there are usually no effective therapeutic agents remaining to
constitute a successful combination therapy regimen [2]. In conjunction with HIV, this represents a serious
problem. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the identification of novel targets
and pathways within M. tuberculosis in order to develop new
chemotherapeutic agents.Analysis of the genome sequence of M. tuberculosis H37Rv [3], together with saturation
transposon mutagenesis by Himar1 [4], has led to the identification of a number of
different proteins and biosynthetic pathways, which may be attractive targets for
antitubercular therapy as they are predicted to be essential for the survival of
M. tuberculosis in vitro. One such pathway that has been
identified as essential for the survival of M. tuberculosis in
vitro is the pentose-phosphate pathway (PPP). Furthermore, evidence
that this pathway is an important metabolic process for mycobacteria is provided by
its conservation in Mycobacterium leprae, as this obligate pathogen
has undergone massive gene decay, resulting in a core set of genes that are required
for its survival in humans [5]. A
putative functional transketolase (TKT) gene product, which is part of this
non-oxidative branch of the PPP, has been identified in M.
tuberculosis through a number of proteomic studies and two-dimensional
liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry studies [6-10].TKT enzymes (EC2.2.1.1) have been identified and studied in several organisms,
including humans [11,12], Saccharomyces
cerevisiae [13-15],
Escherichia coli [16], maize [17],
spinach [18] and Plasmodium
falciparum [19], the
causative agent of malaria. These are typically cytosolic enzymes have a molecular
mass of 70–75 kDa, with the homodimer being the active entity. This class of
enzyme uses the cofactor thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) and a divalent metal cation to
catalyse the cleavage of carbon–carbon bonds to transfer two ketolcarbon
units from donorketose sugars, such as xylulose-5-phosphate, to acceptor aldose
sugars, such as ribose-5-phosphate or erythrose-4-phosphate, resulting in the
production of sedoheptulose-7-phosphate or fructose-6-phosphate, respectively (figure 1) [20-23]. The reaction proceeds via a Ping Pong Bi Bi mechanism. A broad
range of donor and acceptor substrates have been reported, with the bacterial, plant
and yeast enzymes having a wider range of substrate recognition than humanTKT
enzymes [22].
Figure 1.
Transketolase enzyme catalysed reactions. TKT catalyses the cleavage of
carbon–carbon bonds to transfer two ketol carbon units from donor
ketose sugars, like xylulose-5-phosphate, to acceptor aldose sugars,
such as ribose-5-phosphate or erythrose-4-phosphate, resulting in the
production of sedoheptulose-7-phosphate or fructose-6-phosphate.
Transketolase enzyme catalysed reactions. TKT catalyses the cleavage of
carbon–carbon bonds to transfer two ketolcarbon units from donorketose sugars, like xylulose-5-phosphate, to acceptor aldose sugars,
such as ribose-5-phosphate or erythrose-4-phosphate, resulting in the
production of sedoheptulose-7-phosphate or fructose-6-phosphate.The first TKT structure that was reported in literature was from S.
cerevisiae (pdb 1trk) [24]. Subsequently, a number of other structures have been solved, both
with and without sugar substrates and cofactor, for other species including
E. coli (pdb 2r5n) [25], maize (pdb 1itz) [17], Leishmania mexicana (pdb 1r9j) [26], Thermus
thermopilus (pdb 2e6k), Bacillus anthracis (pdb 3hyl)
and Francisella tularensis (pdb 3kom). Until recently, no mammalianTKT structures were available; however, the human structure has recently been solved
(pdb 3ooy and 3mos) [11]. All of
the TKT structures from the different species show a similar overall TKT fold and
arrangement of three domains [13,17,24,26,27]. Domains I (1–322) and II (323–527), numbering from
the TKT enzyme from S. cerevisiae, have been shown to be involved
in dimeric interactions of each monomeric subunit and are also involved in TPP
cofactor binding and recognition. The third domain, which comprises the last
approximately 150 amino acids, is believed to be involved in the regulation of the
activity of the enzyme and in stereochemical control of the sugar substrates, in
which D-threo at the C-3 and C-4 positions are favoured [13,24,28-30]. Studies have shown that the TKT
enzyme from E. coli is still active in the absence of the third
domain [28].Despite its importance in plants and bacteria, detailed studies of TKTs from a
mycobacterial species have not yet been reported. The cell wall of M.
tuberculosis is unique in its complexity, comprising three covalently
attached layers (peptidoglycan, arabinogalactan and mycolic acids), and is very
important to the survival of M. tuberculosis, its pathogenicity and
impermeability to drugs. One of the first committed steps in the production of the
arabinogalactan layer of M. tuberculosis is the production of
D-ribose-5-phosphate. The biosynthesis of D-ribose-5-phosphate can potentially occur
through two processes [31]: either
the enzyme ribose-5-phosphate isomerase (Rv2465) can convert ribulose-5-phosphate to
D-ribose-5-phosphate [32], or the
TKT enzyme (Rv1449) can convert sedoheptulose-7-phosphate to D-ribose-5-phosphate.
Given that the ribose-5-phosphate isomerase enzyme Rv2465 is not essential based on
the studies of Sassetti et al. [4], it is thought that the TKT plays a key role in
linking the non-oxidative part of the PPP to biosynthesis of pentosesugars and
hence to essential arabinans in cell wall biosynthesis. A number of current
antitubercular drugs target key components of the cell wall, including isoniazid and
ethionamide (which block mycolic acid synthesis [33-35]), ethambutol (which targets arabinogalactan formation [36]) and cycloserine (which inhibits
the biosynthesis of peptidoglycan [37,38]). Recently, a
new class of compounds, 1,3-benzothiazin-4-ones, have been identified that prevent
the formation of arabinose by inhibition of the decaprenyl-phosphoribose epimerase
activity catalysed by the DprE1 and DrpE2 proteins [39].Given the potential importance of TKT in the production of arabinan in M.
tuberculosis, this biosynthetic pathway is an attractive target for
identifying additional, novel antitubercular agents. As the first step in this
process, we report here our structural and functional studies of the TKT enzyme from
M. tuberculosis (TBTKT), encoded by gene
rv1449c, and discuss structural differences between the human,
yeast and bacterial homologues.
Material and methods
All chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, unless otherwise
stated. Restriction enzymes were obtained from New England Biolabs. Double-distilled
water was used throughout.
Plasmid construction
The putative TKT gene, rv1449c, was amplified in two steps by
PCR from cosmid I392 of M. tuberculosis using gene-specific
primers, followed by gateway adaptor primers with attB1 and attB2 sites for
incorporation into the gateway entry vector pDONR207 (Invitrogen). The gateway
adaptor forward primer encoded a thrombin recognition sequence
ctggttccgcgtggatc. The first PCR step used primers
5′CTGGTTCCGCGTGGATCCACCACACTCGAAGAGATCTCCG (forward) and
5′-CAAGAAAGCTGGGTCTCAGTTATCCAGCGCTCGTTCG-3′ (reverse). The second
PCR reaction used primers
5′-ggggACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCctggttccgcgtggatc-3′ (forward)
and 5′-ggggACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTC-3′ (reverse). For both PCR
reactions, PCR amplification consisted of 30 cycles (95°C, 2 min;
95°C, 1 min; 60°C, 30 s; 72°C, 3 min), followed by an
extension cycle (10 min at 72°C). The resulting PCR product was cloned
into the pDONR207 vector and the resultant plasmid was used to transfer the gene
sequence into pET160_DEST (Invitrogen; N-term hexa-histidine-tag) by homologous
recombination. The Rv1449c_pET160_DEST plasmid obtained was sequenced fully and
used for protein expression.
Heterologous overexpression of transketolase enzyme from
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Escherichia coliBL21(DE3) transformed with the
Rv1449c_pET160_DEST plasmid was grown at 27°C to an optical density at
600 nm (OD600) of 0.6–0.8 in 2xLuria-Bertani (LB) medium
supplemented with 100 μg ml−1 ampicillin. The
production of the protein was induced with 500 μM
isopropyl-β-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and the cultures were grown at
16°C overnight with shaking. The cells were harvested by centrifugation
at 6000 g for 20 min at 4°C, and the cell pellet was resuspended in lysis
buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, 500 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TPP, 10 per cent
glycerol, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% Triton-X 100 and pH 7.4)
and Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche). The cells were
freeze–thawed and sonicated. Following centrifugation at 18 000 g for 30
min at 4°C, the supernatant was loaded onto a Cobalt-Talon affinity
column.
Purification of transketolase enzyme from Mycobacterium
tuberculosis
Recombinant TBTKT was purified in three steps. The soluble lysate was incubated
with Talon-resin (Clontech) at 4°C for 1 h. The column was washed with 20
mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TPP, 10 per cent glycerol, 5
mM β-mercaptoethanol (pH 7.4) and the His-tagged protein eluted with
increasing concentrations of imidazole. The 50 and 250 mM imidazole fractions as
determined by SDS-PAGE were pooled, concentrated (Amicon centrifugal device) and
run on a Resource Q column (GE Healthcare) in 20 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM
sodium chloride, 2 mM TPP and 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol (pH 7.4), and eluted
with sodium chloride (0.1–1 M). Fractions containing TBTKT were pooled
and purified further using size exclusion chromatography. Gel filtration
experiments were carried out on a Superdex 200 16/60 column (GE Healthcare). The
gel filtration column was run in 20 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride,
2 mM TPP, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol (pH 7.4). Fractions containing TBTKT
were pooled, and the dimer and monomeric fractions collected separately.
Crystallization of transketolase enzyme from Mycobacterium
tuberculosis
Monomeric TBTKT was concentrated to 8 mg ml−1 (Amicon
ultracentrifugal concentrators from Millipore) and buffer exchanged into 20 mM
Tris-HCl, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1 mM
dithiothreitol (DTT) (TED) buffer plus 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM TPP (pH 7.6)
or 20 mM glycyl-glycine (Gly-Gly), 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM TPP (pH 7.7).
The crystals were grown using the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion technique by
mixing equal volumes (150 nl) of concentrated TBTKT with mother liquor using a
protein crystallization robot (Mosquito, TTP LabTech). TBTKT crystals grew
within one week at 22°C, in 0.1 M ammonium acetate, 0.1 M bis-tris pH 5.5
and 17% w/v polyethylene glycol 10 000 with the protein in buffer 20 mM
Gly-Gly, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM TPP (pH 7.7).
Data collection, structure determination and refinement
The TBTKT crystal was cryoprotected with 30% v/v glycerol and flash frozen
in liquid nitrogen prior to data collection. Data were collected on beamline
PXIII at the Swiss Light Source (Villigen, Switzerland) with a mar225 mosaic CCD
detector. The space group was determined, and the data were integrated, scaled
and merged using the program XDS [40]. PHASER [41]
was used to solve the TBTKT structure by molecular replacement with a TBTKT
model, built using Swiss-Model [42] and the TKT structure from E.
coli (PDB code 2r8o chain A [25]) as a template. The structure was refined by
iterative cycles of alternating manual rebuilding in O [43] and Coot [44], and reciprocal space crystallographic
refinement with Refmac5 [45]. The successful refinement was dependent on making use of the
non-crystallographical symmetry for averaging using the tools within O. Data
processing and refinement statistics are shown in table 1. Preparation of structure-related images
was carried out with PyMOL (version 0.99, Schrödinger, LLC).
Sequences were aligned with ClustalW2, and sequence figures were
generated with ESPript version 2.2 [47,48].
Table 1.
Data collection and refinement statistics. Numbers in brackets denote
values for the highest-resolution shell.
TBTKT (3RIM)
data collection statistics
beam line
PXIII – Swiss Light Source
space group
P1
resolution range (Å)
50–2.49 (2.64–2.49)
wavelength
0.979000
cell dimensions
cell axial lengths (Å)
a = 75.5, b
= 80.1, c = 130.0
cell angles (o)
α = 82.2,
β = 81.2, γ
= 66.4
number of molecules in the asymmetric unit
4
redundancy
3.9 (3.65)
completeness (%)
96.6 (91.2)
Rmeasa
15.9 (54.0)
mean I/σI
7.90 (2.77)
refinement statistics
resolution range
50–2.49
Rwork/Rfree
0.22/0.27
number of atoms
protein/ligand/water
21206/156/410
Ramachandran
favoured/allowed/disallowed (%)
88.4/11.6/0
average B-factor (Å2)
protein/ligand/solvent
27.2/27.6/19.3
root mean square deviations
bond lengths (Å)
0.017
bond angles (Å)
1.634
aRmeas is defined by
Diederichs & Karplus [46].
Data collection and refinement statistics. Numbers in brackets denote
values for the highest-resolution shell.aRmeas is defined by
Diederichs & Karplus [46].The atomic coordinates and experimental structure factor data of the refined
M. tuberculosis TKT have been deposited in the protein data
bank (PDB code 3RIM).
Steady-state kinetic analysis
Activity of the recombinant TKT was measured by the reduction of potassium
ferricyanide by the α-carbanion intermediate formed, as described
previously by Kochetov [49].
The reaction was carried out in 100 μl in a 96-well plate, in 50 mM
Gly-Gly buffer (pH 7.6), 2 mM magnesium chloride, 0.1 mM TPP, 0.5 mM potassium
ferricyanide, 3 mM fructose-6-phosphate (6FP) and recombinant TBTKT enzyme, and
the reduction of potassium ferricyanide was monitored at 420 nm on a Tecan
Infinite M200 plate reader at 37°C. The
Km values were
determined by varying the concentration of substrate from 0 to 4 mM.
Alternatively, the activity of the recombinant TKT was measured using the
auxiliary enzymes: triosephosphate isomerase and α-glycerophosphate
dehydrogenase. The reaction (100 μl) was performed in a 96-well plate, in
50 mM Gly-Gly buffer (pH 7.6), 2 mM magnesium chloride, 0.1 mM TPP, 0.4 mM NADH
4 mM ribose-5-phosphate (R5P) and 4 mM xylulose-5-phosphate (X5P), 8 units of
triosephosphate isomerase and 8 units of α-glycerophosphate
dehydrogenase. Oxidation of NADH was followed spectrophotometrically by
measuring the absorbance at 340 nm (A340), as described previously by
Kochetov [21]. Substrate
concentrations were varied to below and above the
Km,app value. The program Prism
(version 5, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, www.graphpad.com) was used for nonlinear regression analysis of
kinetic data. Inhibitors oxythiamine (Sigma) and
5-benzyl-3-phenylpyrazolo[1,5-α]pyrimidin-7(4H)-one (Chembridge Screening
Library) were added at a final concentration of 30 μM and tested in both
enzyme assays.
Testing for in vitro growth inhibition of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
The inhibitory activity of oxythiamine was tested at a concentration range of
0–100 μg ml−1 in the resazurin reduction assay
as described previously [39].
Results
Identification and production of transketolase enzyme from
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
A putative TKT gene (tkt, rv1449c; hereafter TBTKT) was
annotated in the genome of M. tuberculosis (http://tuberculist.epfl.ch/index.html) based on the presence of a
consensus sequence for TPP binding and extensive sequence similarity to other
known TKT genes. The predicted open reading frame of TBTKT contains a specific
sequence motif of THDSIGLGEDGPTHQPIE that has been identified previously in
other TKT proteins [50] and
corresponds to amino acids 490–507 in this enzyme. Interestingly, a
second sequence motif, which is common to thiamine cofactor-binding enzymes, is
a GDG consensus motif followed by 21 amino acids varying in sequence identity.
In M. tuberculosis, the GDG motif has been replaced by SDG
(amino acids 176–178), and this is also the case in all other sequenced
mycobacterial TKTs (figure 2;
electronic supplementary material, S1). No other known TKT enzymes that have
been studied contain this mutation in the TKT consensus sequence [11].
Figure 2.
Sequence comparison of transketolase enzyme from
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TBTKT) and human
transketolase (TKT). Sequence alignment of TBTKT versus human TKT
using the programs ClustalW2 and ESPript version
2.2 [47,48]. Numbering
corresponds to the sequence of TBTKT. Identical residues are
indicated by a red background, and conserved residues are indicated
by red characters. The secondary structure elements of TBTKT are
shown above the sequences, and those of human TKT are shown
below.
Sequence comparison of transketolase enzyme from
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TBTKT) and humantransketolase (TKT). Sequence alignment of TBTKT versus humanTKT
using the programs ClustalW2 and ESPript version
2.2 [47,48]. Numbering
corresponds to the sequence of TBTKT. Identical residues are
indicated by a red background, and conserved residues are indicated
by red characters. The secondary structure elements of TBTKT are
shown above the sequences, and those of humanTKT are shown
below.To produce recombinant TBTKT protein, primers were designed and the full-length
tkt gene was cloned with an N-terminal hexa-histidine tag
and over-expressed in an E. coli expression system. Soluble,
active protein was obtained in a yield of 10 mg l−1 bacterial
culture and purified to apparent homogeneity.
Overall structure of transketolase enzyme from Mycobacterium
tuberculosis
Crystal trials of TBTKT were set down as described (§3.4). Crystals
typically grew after 7 days, and diffraction data were collected from crystals
that were formed in 17% w/v polyethylene glycol 10 K, 0.1 M ammonium
acetate, in 0.1 M bis-tris at pH 5.5. Crystals of the TBTKT were in symmetry
group P1 with four molecules predicted in the asymmetric unit,
with a Matthew's coefficient [51] of 2.3 Å3 Da–1 and a solvent
content of 46 per cent. The structure was solved by using molecular replacement
with a homology model of TBTKT built using Swiss-Model [42] and the E.
coli TKT structure (pdb 2r8o) [25] that has 42 per cent amino acid sequence
identity to TBTKT. In almost all protein molecules, electron density could be
observed for residues 6–700, the last residue of the full-length protein.
The final model was refined with tight non-crystallographic restraints to a
resolution of 2.5 Å and consists of 2776 amino acids, 410 water
molecules, four TPP molecules, 4 Mg2+ ions and eight glycerol
molecules, with an Rwork of 22 per cent and an
Rfree of 27 per cent (pdb 3RIM; table 1).The TBTKT enzyme forms a homodimer, where the two monomeric units are related by
a non-crystallographic twofold axis. There are two dimers per asymmetric unit
that are related to each other by a twofold axis to create a
non-crystallographic screw axis parallel to the crystallographic
Z-axis. The overall structure of each TBTKT monomer
consists of three domains interconnected by flexible linker regions (figure
3a,b). The N-terminal pyrophosphate
(PP)-binding domain (domain I) that binds the PP part of TPP (residues
6–299) consists of a central five-stranded parallel β-sheet,
surrounded by 11 α-helices. The pyridine (Pyr)-binding domain (domain II)
that involves the aminopyrimidine moiety of TPP (residues 377–550)
comprises a central six-stranded parallel β-sheet with seven
α-helices surrounding it. The C-terminal domain (Domain III, residues
571–700) forms a central five-stranded mixed β-sheet with four
parallel strands and one antiparallel strand. These three domains are linked by
linkers (linker 1: residues 300–376; linker 2: residues 551–570;
figure
3a,b). Domains I and II are mostly involved in dimer
formation, while the third domain makes rather few contacts to the other subunit
(figure
3a,b). The Protein Interfaces,
Surfaces and Assemblies (PISA) service at the European Bioinformatics Institute
(http://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd-srv/prot_int/pistart.html) gives a
complexation significance score of 0.614 between chains A and B (or chains C and
D), indicating that the interface plays an essential role in dimer complexation
with a large number of residues involved. There are 60 hydrogen bonds and 15
salt-bridges between the two monomers. In total, a surface of around 4200
Å2 is buried upon formation of the dimer (chains A and B
and chains C and D), with 17 per cent of the total residues being involved in
its formation. The solvent accessible surface area of a monomeric subunit is 25
785 Å2. TBTKT is also found as a homodimer in solution as seen
by size exclusion chromatography (data not shown) and therefore it is likely
that the homodimer found in the crystal structure is the biologically relevant
unit as shown for other TKT enzymes. Two important conserved residues involved
in dimeric interaction are Glu182 and Glu441, the buried acidic side chains of
which form a hydrogen bond interaction, allowing Glu441 to interact with the
N1′ atom of the aminopyrimidine ring of the TPP [13].
Figure 3.
Crystal structure of TBTKT and superposition to human tkt.
(a) Surface representation of TBTKT dimer with
bound cofactor TPP (pink) with one monomer in grey and the second
monomer coloured by domains (blue, domain I; orange, domain II;
green, domain III; red, linkers 1, 2). (b) Dimer
representation of TBTKT with one monomer represented as surface and
coloured by B-factor, and the second one as a cartoon with the
domains coloured as in (a). (c)
Superposition of TBTKT and human tkt (pdb code 3MOS) monomers
depicted as cartoon representation. The domains are colour-coded as
in (a) and (b), with human tkt in
lighter colours compared with TBTKT. (d) The
structures are rotated 90° around the twofold axis compared
with (c).
Crystal structure of TBTKT and superposition to humantkt.
(a) Surface representation of TBTKT dimer with
bound cofactor TPP (pink) with one monomer in grey and the second
monomer coloured by domains (blue, domain I; orange, domain II;
green, domain III; red, linkers 1, 2). (b) Dimer
representation of TBTKT with one monomer represented as surface and
coloured by B-factor, and the second one as a cartoon with the
domains coloured as in (a). (c)
Superposition of TBTKT and humantkt (pdb code 3MOS) monomers
depicted as cartoon representation. The domains are colour-coded as
in (a) and (b), with humantkt in
lighter colours compared with TBTKT. (d) The
structures are rotated 90° around the twofold axis compared
with (c).The subunits of different TKT structures were compared and superimposed using
DaliLite version 3 [52]. The TBTKT and humanTKT structures can be
superimposed with a root mean square deviation (RMSD) value of 2.3 Å and
a high Dali Z-score of 36.7 (584 Cα atoms were aligned, 23%
sequence identity to TBTKT). With other TKTs, the following values were
obtained: for yeast (pdb 1trk), RMSD of 1.4 Å, Z-score of 48.4 (678
Cα atoms, 44% sequence identity); for E. coli
(pdb 2r5n), RMSD of 1.6 Å, Z-score of 48.0 (663 Cα atoms,
42% sequence identity); for B. anthracis (pdb 3hyl),
RMSD of 1.3 Å, Z-score of 50.1 (663 Cα atoms, 47% sequence
identity); for maize (pdb 1itz), RMSD of 1.5 Å, Z-score of 49.4 (666
Cα atoms, 44% sequence identity). The combined superimposition
results of TBTKT and other TKT structures confirm the similarity of the overall
fold and domain topology of TKT enzymes from different species. However, the
TBTKT enzyme is 87 amino acids longer than the humanTKT. The deletions in the
humanTKT correspond to two loop regions at amino acids 153–167 (in
domain I) and amino acids 413–432 (in domain II) in TBTKT. No binding is
predicted to occur between these residues and substrate or TPP cofactor. In
addition, linker 1 is longer and more structured, forming a helix-turn-helix in
TBTKT compared with humanTKT—77 amino acids (residues 300 to 376) versus
39 amino acids (residues 277 to 315)—and may result in some specificity
(figure
3c,d).
Binding of TPP and Mg2+ ion to transketolase enzyme from
Mycobacterium tuberculosis and comparison with homologues
from different species
Well-defined electron density has revealed the binding pocket of the cofactor TPP
and an Mg2+ ion in the TBTKT structure. Each TBTKT monomer
contains one TPP molecule and one Mg2+ ion, suggesting that
each active site is equivalent, and this has been found to be the case for other
reported structures of TKT enzymes [11,13,15,17,25]. An active site cleft is formed between the two monomeric units
allowing the cofactors TPP and Mg2+ to bind, such that the
N-terminal domain I of chain A binds the PP moiety of TPP, and domain II of
chain B interacts with the aminopyrimidine ring. The PP moiety of TPP is
anchored in place through a number of hydrogen bonds formed with residues Thr48,
His85, Ser176, Asp177, Gly178, Asn207, Ile209 and His283 from one monomer (figure 4a). The
Mg2+ ion is octahedrally coordinated to residues Asp177,
Asn207 and Ile209, along with two oxygen atoms of the PP moiety of the cofactor
TPP and a water molecule.
Figure 4.
Structure of the cofactor-binding site in TBTKT. (a)
Illustration showing TPP cofactor as cyan sticks,
Mg2+ as a cyan sphere as well as selected
amino acid residues in stick representation. Amino acids contributed
by different monomers are indicated by different colour-coding.
(b) Superposition of the TBTKT (green) to human
TKT (silver) with cofactors TPP and Mg2+, and
selected residues in stick representation.
Structure of the cofactor-binding site in TBTKT. (a)
Illustration showing TPP cofactor as cyan sticks,
Mg2+ as a cyan sphere as well as selected
amino acid residues in stick representation. Amino acids contributed
by different monomers are indicated by different colour-coding.
(b) Superposition of the TBTKT (green) to humanTKT (silver) with cofactors TPP and Mg2+, and
selected residues in stick representation.Of the eight residues of TBTKT that are involved in hydrogen bonding to the PP
moiety of TPP, four residues are conserved among all TKT enzymes, including the
mammalian versions, and these correspond to His85, Asp177, Asn207 and His283 in
TBTKT. One non-conserved amino acid residue is Thr48, and this is specific to
mycobacterial TKTs (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). By
superposing the available structures, Thr48 corresponds to an alanine residue in
both yeast (pdb 1ngs) [15] and
E. coli (1qgd) [25], and a leucine in maize (pdb 1itz) [17]; this residue is unable to interact with the
cofactor. However, the equivalent serine residue in humanTKT (Ser40) also has
the potential to hydrogen bond with the terminal PP moiety in a manner similar
to that of Thr48 as found in the TBTKT structure. Ile209 is highly conserved
among non-mammalian species and is replaced by a leucine residue in humanTKT
(Leu187), but this does not affect its interaction to the divalent ion through
its backbone carbonyl group. The other non-conserved residue that is involved in
the binding of the PP segment of TPP is the hydroxyl side chain of Ser176 (figure 4b). This
is noteworthy since Ser176 represents the mutation in the consensus sequence GDG
to SDG. This non-conserved residue in the motif does not affect the overall fold
of the protein and forms a turn separating a β-stand from an
α-helix in the βαβ-fold. In TBTKT, the hydroxyl side
chain is positioned to hydrogen bond with the PP group of the cofactor. However,
in the yeast and human structures, the equivalent glycine residues (Gly156 in
yeastTKT and Gly154 in humanTKT) lack this hydroxyl side chain and cannot form
such a hydrogen bond with the PP moiety. The backbone carbonyl oxygen of the
glycine residue is pointed away from the cofactor and does not compensate for
this lack of hydrogen bond in this way. We demonstrated in our kinetic
experiments that mutating GDG to SDG does not affect the activity of the enzyme,
and this can be explained at the structural level by the remaining hydrogen
bonding of the backbone nitrogen of another residue, Gly178, corresponding to
Glu157 in human and Gly158 in yeast, to the PP of TPP. Moreover, additional
interactions are formed in humanTKT between Lys75 and Lys244 and the PP moiety
of TPP that are not present in TBTKT (replaced by Ala83 and Ile269,
respectively; figure
4b).The pyrimidine ring portion of TPP binds in a hydrophobic core that is formed by
residues from both monomers: Leu135 and Ile211 from one monomer, and Leu402,
Val439, Phe464, Phe467 and Tyr470 from the second monomer (figure 4a). The pyrimidine ring
forms π-stacking interactions with the phenyl ring of residue 467. There
are also hydrogen bond interactions between the pyrimidine ring, and Glu441,
Gly133 and His503. Glu441 has been demonstrated to be important in activating
the cofactor by protonating the N1′ position of the aminopyrimidine ring
[13], and it appears that
this will also occur in TBTKT. Of these residues, Glu441 and Gly133, as well as
Phe464, Phe467 and Leu135, are conserved among yeast and humanTKT enzymes.
Leu402 and Tyr470 are replaced by slightly more hydrophilic residues in the
human equivalent (Thr342 and Arg395, respectively). However, these residues are
positioned in a similar way as the yeastTKT and TBTKT residues, and do not form
extra hydrogen bonds to the aminopyrimidine ring of TPP.
Kinetic studies of transketolase enzyme from Mycobacterium
tuberculosis
Apparent kinetic (Km,app) constants were determined
for TBTKT with the two donor substrates—xylulose-5-phosphate (X5P) and
fructose-6-phosphate (F6P)—and the acceptor substrate ribose-5-phosphate
(R5P). R5P had a Km,app of 0.82 ± 0.12 mM,
F6P had a Km,app of 0.63 ± 0.09 mM and X5P
had a Km,app of 0.35 ± 0.12 mM (table 2). These kinetic constant
values for the TBTKT enzyme are comparable with kinetic constants previously
determined for TKTs from S. cerevisiae [15,21], spinach [53],
E. coli [16] and P. falciparum [19] (table 2), with X5P having the highest binding affinity. As explained
by the crystal structure, mutation of GDG to SDG has no effect upon the TKT
reaction as the cofactor TPP still binds to the active pocket in the same manner
via additional hydrogen bounds formed (e.g. by Lys75, Lys244 and Gly157 in humanTKT). Based on these kinetic studies, it appears that the TBTKT is more similar
to the TKTs from bacteria, yeast and plants because it was shown that
fructose-6-phosphate is a poor substrate for the humanTKT enzyme, with a
Km,app of 7 mM [22], whereas in TBTKT, F6P is a good substrate
for catalysis, with a Km,app of 0.63 mM (table 2).
Table 2.
Steady-state kinetic constants, Km,app (mM), of TBTKT and
other transketolase enzymes. Assay conditions for TBTKT are detailed
under ‘§2’. n.d., not determined.
R5P
F6P
X5P
reference
M. tuberculosis
0.8 ± 0.1
0.6 ± 0.1
0.4 ± 0.1
this study
human
0.61 ± 0.36
7 mM
0.30 ± 0.79
[11],
[22]
S. cerevisiae
0.4
1.8
0.21
[21]
S. cerevisiae
0.15 ± 0.21
n.d.
0.70 ± 0.10
[15]
S. cerevisiae H481A
0.15 ± 0.50
n.d.
1.24 ± 0. 90
[15]
S. cerevisiae H481Q
n.d.
n.d.
4.08 ± 0.51
[15]
spinach chloropasts
0.33
n.d.
0.06
[53]
E. coli
1.4
1.1
0.16
[16]
P. falciparum
n.d.
2.25 ± 0.5
n.d.
[19]
Steady-state kinetic constants, Km,app (mM), of TBTKT and
other transketolase enzymes. Assay conditions for TBTKT are detailed
under ‘§2’. n.d., not determined.Previous extensive mechanistic studies of TKT enzymes have shown that this class
of enzyme follows Ping Pong Bi Bi reaction kinetics where the donor and acceptor
substrates are not able to bind to the protein simultaneously [14,22,25,54,55].The structure suggests that this would also be the case for TBTKT because the
substrate cleft is not large enough to allow binding of donor and acceptor sugar
substrates simultaneously. The yeastTKT enzyme has been co-crystallized with
the substrate erythrose-4-phosphate (pdb 1ngs) [56], with no large conformational changes
observed upon binding of the substrate, and this led to the identification of a
number of catalytically important residues for substrate recognition. These
residues are all conserved and correspond to His45, His283, Arg378, Ser405,
His491, Asp499 and Arg552 in TBTKT (figure 5a). The residues Arg378, Arg552 and His491
have been shown to be important in the recognition of the phosphate moiety of
the sugar [56]. These residues
in TBTKT can be superimposed upon those from the yeast structure and human
structure (figure
5a), and it is envisaged that the TKTsugar
substrates for the TBTKT enzyme are able to bind in a similar manner, and the
enzyme reacts via a Ping Pong Bi Bi reaction mechanism [29,30,57,58].
Figure 5.
Superposition of active sites of TBTKT (pdb code 3RIM), human TKT
(pdb code 3MOS) and yeast TKT (pdb code 1ngs). (a)
Illustration of the three structures with sphere representation of
substrate erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P) and cofactors TPP and
Mg2+ as found in the active site of yeast TKT.
Amino acid residues (amino acid numbering: TBTKT/human TKT/yeast
TKT) involved in the binding of E4P to yeast TKT (light blue orange)
as well as the corresponding TBTKT (green and pink) and human TKT
(dark blue/yellow) amino acid residues are shown in stick
representation. (b) Illustration of TBTKT and human
TKT with selected amino acid residues of TBTKT (magenta) and human
TKT (yellow). Cofactors TPP and Mg2+ are
represented as spheres. Same orientation as in
(a).
Superposition of active sites of TBTKT (pdb code 3RIM), humanTKT
(pdb code 3MOS) and yeastTKT (pdb code 1ngs). (a)
Illustration of the three structures with sphere representation of
substrate erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P) and cofactors TPP and
Mg2+ as found in the active site of yeastTKT.
Amino acid residues (amino acid numbering: TBTKT/humanTKT/yeastTKT) involved in the binding of E4P to yeastTKT (light blue orange)
as well as the corresponding TBTKT (green and pink) and humanTKT
(dark blue/yellow) amino acid residues are shown in stick
representation. (b) Illustration of TBTKT and humanTKT with selected amino acid residues of TBTKT (magenta) and humanTKT (yellow). Cofactors TPP and Mg2+ are
represented as spheres. Same orientation as in
(a).Two inhibitors of the humanTKT were tested for inhibitory activity against
purified TBTKT enzyme, as well as on live M. tuberculosis
cells. Oxythiamine is an analogue of the cofactor TPP and inhibits TKT activity
in humantumour cells in vivo [59], although it is only a weak inhibitor
in vitro [60]. Oxythiamine has also been found to inhibit weakly the TKT
enzyme from P. falciparum but to have in vivo
activity against P. falciparum [19]. The other inhibitor of humanTKT—5-benzyl-3-phenylpyrazolo[1,5-α]pyrimidin-7(4H)-one (5BPPO), a
compound identified from a high-throughput screen of 64 000 compounds against
humanTKT—was also found to be active against three cancer cell lines,
and had IC50 values in the low micromolar range [60]. Oxythiamine had no inhibitory activity on
the TBTKT enzyme at a relatively high concentration of 30 µM (table 3). Instead, oxythiamine,
at this concentration, increased the rate of the reaction of the TBTKT enzyme by
30 per cent under the assay conditions tested. We are unable to explain this
result structurally because oxythiamine is predicted to bind in the same
position as TPP in both the TBTKT and humanTKT enzymes (results not shown). In
addition, 5BPPO also had no inhibitory effect on the activity of TBTKT at a
concentration of 30 µM (table
3), which is higher than the IC50 value of 4 µM
determined for the humanTKT enzyme [60]. When tested for their inhibitory effects on the growth of
M. tuberculosis in vitro, both compounds (oxythiamine and
5BPPO) displayed no growth inhibition at concentrations as high as 100 µg
ml−1, corresponding to a molar concentration of 332
µM for oxythiamine and 227 µM for 5BPPO (table 3).
Table 3.
Effects of human TKT inhibitors on TBTKT and in
vitro growth of M. tuberculosis. Assay
conditions are detailed under §2. 5BPPO,
5-benzyl-3-phenylpyrazolo[1,5-α]pyrimidin-7(4H)-one.
inhibitor
structure
IC50 TBTKT
(μM)
specific activity TBTKTa
(%)
MIC (μg
ml−1)/(μM)
Oxythiamine
>30
130
>100/>332
5BPPO
>30
100
>100/>227
aSpecific activity of the TBTKT enzyme calculated
compared with a 5% DMSO control taken as 100%
activity.
Effects of humanTKT inhibitors on TBTKT and in
vitro growth of M. tuberculosis. Assay
conditions are detailed under §2. 5BPPO,
5-benzyl-3-phenylpyrazolo[1,5-α]pyrimidin-7(4H)-one.aSpecific activity of the TBTKT enzyme calculated
compared with a 5% DMSO control taken as 100%
activity.
Discussion
Here, we have successfully cloned, expressed and characterized, both kinetically and
structurally, TBTKT, the first TKT enzyme to be characterized from mycobacteria.
Kinetically, TBTKT has very similar kinetic constants to the TKT enzymes from yeast,
E. coli, maize and spinach, despite the GDG to SDG mutation in
the TKT consensus sequence. The TBTKT also displays broad substrate specificity for
a range of phosphorylated sugars and in this respect differs from the mammalianTKT,
as the humanTKT enzyme has a much higher Km,app and
lower affinity for fructose-6-phosphate, compared with other identified substrates
[11]. Phylogenetic studies have
shown that mammalianTKT enzymes have diverged distinctly from equivalent TKTs in
plants, yeast and bacteria, and therefore may have diversified to play a different,
more selective role in humans.Structurally, TBTKT consists of three domains with the same overall fold and domain
topology as those of other TKTs whose structures have been determined [11,13,24,25,56,61,62]. Dimer formation and binding of the TPP cofactor occur via domains I
and II, with domain III being more likely to play a regulatory role in substrate
recognition as shown for the E. coli counterpart [28]. The recently reported structure
of the humanTKT structure [11] has
allowed us to determine key structural differences between the humanTKT enzyme and
the TBTKT. Although the fold of the humanTKT structure is similar overall to that
of the TBTKT structure, despite only 27 per cent amino acid sequence similarity, we
have identified important differences between the two structures, which may be
exploited with a view to identifying specific inhibitors of TBTKT. It is important
to ensure that inhibitors of the TKT enzyme in M. tuberculosis show
specificity and do not inhibit humanTKT or other thiamine-dependent enzymes such as
pyruvate dehydrogenase, in order to minimize potential side-effects associated with
a decrease in thiamine availability [22]. First, the substrate-binding channel in the humanTKT enzyme is
narrower than the TBTKT equivalent. This structural difference is believed to result
in a more selective substrate specificity of humanTKT compared with TBTKT [11]. The entrance of this substrate
channel in the humanTKT enzyme contains a lysine residue (Lys260) that is predicted
to be involved in the binding of the phosphate of the sugar substrate [11]. This lysine residue is replaced
by smaller residues in TBTKT and yeastTKT (Ala285 and Ala265, respectively),
leaving more space to accommodate larger substrates (figure 5b).TPP cofactor binding differs slightly between TBTKT and humanTKT. The hydrophobic
core that binds the pyrimidine ring of TPP in TBTKT is more hydrophilic in the humanTKT enzyme. Moreover, the human enzyme displays a quasi-irreversible binding of TPP,
which has not been observed for the yeast and E. coli homologues,
in which the activity of recombinant humanTKT in not dependent upon an excess of
TPP or a divalent cation in the assay mixture. This is believed to be conferred in
part by residue Gln189 (replaced by Ile211 in TBTKT) by sterically hindering
cofactor dissociation [11] (figure 5b).Another important difference between human and mycobacterial TKTs is the absence of
the characteristic TKT five-histidine cluster from humanTKT, as one of these
histidines (His481 in yeast and His503 in TBTKT) has been replaced by a glutamine
(Gln428; figure 5b).
In yeast, His481 has mutated to Gln481, resulting in an increase in
Km,app values for X5P from 70 μM in wild-type yeastTKT to
4080 μM in the His481Gln yeastTKT mutant, suggesting a role for this residue
in catalysis and substrate recognition in the activation of TPP through proton
abstraction of the 4′-imino group of the cofactor [15].Overall, the humanTKT enzyme is 87 amino acids shorter than the TBTKT enzyme. The
deletions in the humanTKT correspond to two loops, between amino acids
153–167 and amino acids 413–432 in TBTKT. No possible interactions are
predicted to occur between these loops and substrate or TPP. Also, the linker region
between domains I and II (residues 300–376) is longer in TBTKT and forms a
helix-turn-helix motif that may confer some specificity. On the basis of these
structurally identified differences, it should be possible to design specific
inhibitors rationally. Indeed, it is encouraging that oxythiamine and 5BPPO both
inhibit humanTKT [60], yet showed
no inhibition of TBTKT activity or the growth in vitro of
M. tuberculosis.TBTKT represents a potential novel target for anti-tubercular therapy because it is
predicted to be essential for in vitro growth of M.
tuberculosis [4].
Additionally, TBTKT is believed to have an important role in production of
precursors for the biosynthesis of the arabinans essential for the cell wall [31]. The tkt gene
has been shown to be twofold upregulated 6 days after bacterial infection of host
macrophages, and this probably reflects a response to the stress and toxic oxygen
metabolites within this environment [10]. Additionally, this pathway is also responsible for the production
of erythrose-6-phosphate that feeds into the shikamate pathway, producing folate, a
de novo process in prokaryotic species. Escherichia
coli mutants that lack TKT activity are auxotrophic for shikimic acid
[63], while yeast mutants that
are TKT-deficient are auxotrophic for aromatic amino acids [64]. TKT inhibitors are being considered for
development for cancer therapy because TKT activity is upregulated in proliferative
cells, and specificity for TKT enzymes in cancer cells can therefore be achieved
through targeting an upregulated metabolic process [60].In summary, TBTKT is the first TKT to have been characterized both structurally and
biochemically from a mycobacterial species. The structure has revealed that,
although the overall fold, domain organization and active-site architecture are very
similar to those of other known TKTs, there are key structural and kinetic
differences between the humanTKT and TBTKT enzymes. This will enable us to exploit
the TBTKT structure for rational drug design in an effort to find novel agents for
antitubercular therapy.
Authors: Erik Fiedler; Stina Thorell; Tatyana Sandalova; Ralph Golbik; Stephan König; Gunter Schneider Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-01-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lars Mitschke; Christoph Parthier; Kathrin Schröder-Tittmann; Johannes Coy; Stefan Lüdtke; Kai Tittmann Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: S T Cole; R Brosch; J Parkhill; T Garnier; C Churcher; D Harris; S V Gordon; K Eiglmeier; S Gas; C E Barry; F Tekaia; K Badcock; D Basham; D Brown; T Chillingworth; R Connor; R Davies; K Devlin; T Feltwell; S Gentles; N Hamlin; S Holroyd; T Hornsby; K Jagels; A Krogh; J McLean; S Moule; L Murphy; K Oliver; J Osborne; M A Quail; M A Rajandream; J Rogers; S Rutter; K Seeger; J Skelton; R Squares; S Squares; J E Sulston; K Taylor; S Whitehead; B G Barrell Journal: Nature Date: 1998-06-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Petra Lukacik; Carina M C Lobley; Mario Bumann; Victoria Arena de Souza; Raymond J Owens; Paul W O'Toole; Martin A Walsh Journal: Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 1.056
Authors: Paul James; Michail N Isupov; Simone Antonio De Rose; Christopher Sayer; Isobel S Cole; Jennifer A Littlechild Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Max Cárdenas-Fernández; Fabiana Subrizi; Dragana Dobrijevic; Helen C Hailes; John M Ward Journal: Org Biomol Chem Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 3.876