Literature DB >> 22644709

A cremophor-free self-microemulsified delivery system for intravenous injection of teniposide: evaluation in vitro and in vivo.

Suna He1, Zheng Cui, Dong Mei, Hua Zhang, Xueqing Wang, Wenbing Dai, Qiang Zhang.   

Abstract

In order to tackle the problems on low water solubility of teniposide, involvement of toxic surfactant in its injection, and the poor stability during infusion, a Cremophor-free teniposide self-microemulsified drug delivery system (TEN-SMEDDS) was prepared for the first time, characterized, and evaluated in comparison with teniposide injection (VUMON) in vitro and in vivo. The optimized formulation contained N, N-dimethylacetamide, medium-chain triglyceride, lecithin, and dehydrated alcohol besides teniposide. The TEN-SMEDDS could form fine droplets with mean diameter of 282 ± 21 nm and zeta potential of -7.5 ± 1.7 mV after dilution with 5% glucose, which were stable within 4 h. The release of teniposide from TEN-SMEDDS and VUMON was similar. However, the pharmacokinetic behavior of TEN-SMEDDS in rats was different from that of VUMON, evidenced by the lower area under the concentration-time curve and larger volume of distribution in emulsion group. Finally, TEN-SMEDDS was found to distribute more teniposide in most tissues, especially in reticuloendothelial system, after intravenous administration to rats. Importantly, brain drug level in TEN-SMEDDS group was higher than or similar to that in control group, although the emulsion system had a lower plasma drug concentration. In conclusion, the novel SMEDDS prepared here, without toxic surfactant and as an oil solution before use, may be potential for clinical use due to its low toxicity and high store stability. It may be favorable for the treatment of some tumors like cerebroma, since it may achieve the relatively higher drug level in brain but lower blood concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22644709      PMCID: PMC3429691          DOI: 10.1208/s12249-012-9809-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  39 in total

1.  Teniposide-induced hypersensitivity reactions in children.

Authors:  H Carstensen; H Nolte; H Hertz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-07-01       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  VM-26 (teniposide)-induced hypersensitivity and degranulation of basophils in children.

Authors:  H Nolte; H Carstensen; H Hertz
Journal:  Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  1988

3.  Phase II study of teniposide in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma.

Authors:  G Schwartsmann; E Sprinz; M Kronfeld; J Vinholes; E Sander; M Zampese; R Preger; L Kalakun; A L Brunetto
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Severe hypertensive reactions to teniposide (VM-26) in infants with congenital leukemia.

Authors:  H Shimizu; L S Frankel; S J Culbert
Journal:  Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  1987

5.  Neuro-Oncology Working Group 01 trial of nimustine plus teniposide versus nimustine plus cytarabine chemotherapy in addition to involved-field radiotherapy in the first-line treatment of malignant glioma.

Authors:  Michael Weller; Bettina Müller; Rainer Koch; Michael Bamberg; Peter Krauseneck
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Allergic reactions to teniposide in patients with neuroblastoma and lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  F A Hayes; M Abromowitch; A A Green
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-04

7.  High-dose teniposide for refractory malignancies: a phase I study.

Authors:  E G de Vries; N H Mulder; P E Postmus; R Vriesendorp; P H Willemse; D T Sleijfer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-05

8.  Comparison of cell uptake, biodistribution and tumor retention of folate-coated and PEG-coated gadolinium nanoparticles in tumor-bearing mice.

Authors:  Moses O Oyewumi; Robert A Yokel; Michael Jay; Tricia Coakley; Russell J Mumper
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Influence of teniposide on platelet functions in vitro.

Authors:  P Kubisz; F Seghier; M Dobrotorá; J Stasko; S Cronberg
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 3.944

10.  Effects of Cremophor EL on distribution of Taxol to serum lipoproteins.

Authors:  E Sykes; K Woodburn; D Decker; D Kessel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Nanocrystals for the parenteral delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Yoon Yeo
Journal:  Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 11.354

2.  Enhancing Docetaxel Delivery to Multidrug-Resistant Cancer Cells with Albumin-Coated Nanocrystals.

Authors:  Sheryhan F Gad; Joonyoung Park; Ji Eun Park; Gihan N Fetih; Sozan S Tous; Wooin Lee; Yoon Yeo
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems: An Alternative Approach to Improve Brain Bioavailability of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs through Intranasal Administration.

Authors:  Sara Meirinho; Márcio Rodrigues; Adriana O Santos; Amílcar Falcão; Gilberto Alves
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 6.525

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.