Literature DB >> 22644126

Estimating reference nutrient criteria for Maryland ecoregions.

Raymond P Morgan1, Kathleen M Kline, John B Churchill.   

Abstract

Management of stream nutrients is becoming increasingly important in order to protect both water quality and aquatic resources throughout the USA. Using an extensive water quality database from the long-term Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS), we describe nutrient relationships to landscape characteristics as total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) of small-order, non-tidal streams in USEPA L2 and L3 ecoregions in Maryland and by MBSS stream order at the L2 and L3 ecoregion levels. To protect stream ecosystem integrity, preliminary reference nutrient estimates (TN and TP) as percentiles (25th of all stream reaches and 75th of stream reference reaches) for the six Maryland L3 ecoregions are: Blue Ridge TN 0.29 and 0.64 mg/L, TP 0.0065 and 0.0090 mg/L; Central Appalachians TN 0.40 and 1.0 mg/L, TP 0.0060 and 0.015 mg/L; Middle Atlantic Coastal Plains TN 0.93 and 2.5 mg/L, TP 0.094 and 0.065 mg/L; Northern Piedmont TN 1.6 and 1.8 mg/L, TP 0.010 and 0.015 mg/L; Ridge and Valley TN 0.40 and 0.98 mg/L, TP 0.0063 and 0.012 mg/L; and Southeastern Plains TN 0.33 and 0.82 mg/L, TP 0.016 and 0.042 mg/L. High levels of both TN and TP are present in many streams found in non-tidal watersheds associated with all Maryland ecoregions, but are especially elevated in the Northern Piedmont and Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain ecoregions, with the latter second-order streams (average TN > 2.9 mg/L) significantly higher than all other ecoregion-order combinations. Across all six ecoregions, mean nutrient loading for both TN and TP was generally equivalent in first-order streams to nutrient concentrations seen in both second- and third-order streams, indicating a definite need to increase efforts in preventing nutrients from entering first-order streams. Small-order stream nutrient levels are the drivers for subsequent TN and TP inputs into the upper freshwater tidal reaches of the Chesapeake Bay, resulting in a potential risk for altered estuarine ecosystems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22644126     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2694-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  14 in total

1.  Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes on nitrogen cycling in fluvial systems.

Authors:  Gilles Pinay; Jean Christophe Clément; Robert J Naiman
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Landscape trends in Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern United States ecoregions.

Authors:  Jerry A Griffith; Stephen V Stehman; Thomas R Loveland
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition.

Authors:  John L Stoddard; David P Larsen; Charles P Hawkins; Richard K Johnson; Richard H Norris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Identifying biotic integrity and water chemistry relations in nonwadeable rivers of Wisconsin: toward the development of nutrient criteria.

Authors:  Brian M Weigel; Dale M Robertson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Eutrophication and Harmful Algal Blooms: A Scientific Consensus.

Authors:  J Heisler; P Glibert; J Burkholder; D Anderson; W Cochlan; W Dennison; C Gobler; Q Dortch; C Heil; E Humphries; A Lewitus; R Magnien; H Marshall; K Sellner; D Stockwell; D Stoecker; M Suddleson
Journal:  Harmful Algae       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.273

6.  Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams.

Authors:  B J Peterson; W M Wollheim; P J Mulholland; J R Webster; J L Meyer; J L Tank; E Marti; W B Bowden; H M Valett; A E Hershey; W H McDowell; W K Dodds; S K Hamilton; S Gregory; D D Morrall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Eutrophication of agricultural streams: defining nutrient concentrations to protect ecological condition.

Authors:  Patricia A Chambers; C Vis; R B Brua; M Guy; J M Culp; G A Benoy
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.915

8.  On the fate of anthropogenic nitrogen.

Authors:  William H Schlesinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A method and rationale for deriving nutrient criteria for small rivers and streams in Ohio.

Authors:  Robert J Miltner
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Headwater influences on downstream water quality.

Authors:  Walter K Dodds; Robert M Oakes
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.266

View more
  2 in total

1.  Nutrient baselines of Cerrado low-order streams: comparing natural and impacted sites in Central Brazil.

Authors:  Bárbara Medeiros Fonseca; Luciana de Mendonça-Galvão; Claudia Padovesi-Fonseca; Lucijane Monteiro de Abreu; Adriana Cristina Marinho Fernandes
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Identifying community thresholds for lotic benthic diatoms in response to human disturbance.

Authors:  Tao Tang; Ting Tang; Lu Tan; Yuan Gu; Wanxiang Jiang; Qinghua Cai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.