Literature DB >> 22644108

Estimating the alcohol-breast cancer association: a comparison of diet diaries, FFQs and combined measurements.

Ruth H Keogh1, Jin Young Park, Ian R White, Marleen A H Lentjes, Alison McTaggart, Amit Bhaniani, Benjamin J Cairns, Timothy J Key, Darren C Greenwood, Victoria J Burley, Janet E Cade, Christina C Dahm, Gerda K Pot, Alison M Stephen, Gabriel Masset, Eric J Brunner, Kay-Tee Khaw.   

Abstract

The alcohol-breast cancer association has been established using alcohol intake measurements from Food Frequency Questionnaires (FFQ). For some nutrients diet diary measurements are more highly correlated with true intake compared with FFQ measurements, but it is unknown whether this is true for alcohol. A case-control study (656 breast cancer cases, 1905 matched controls) was sampled from four cohorts in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium. Alcohol intake was measured prospectively using FFQs and 4- or 7-day diet diaries. Both relied on fixed portion sizes allocated to given beverage types, but those used to obtain FFQ measurements were lower. FFQ measurements were therefore on average lower and to enable fair comparison the FFQ was "calibrated" using diet diary portion sizes. Diet diaries gave more zero measurements, demonstrating the challenge of distinguishing never-from episodic-consumers using short term instruments. To use all information, two combined measurements were calculated. The first is an average of the two measurements with special treatment of zeros. The second is the expected true intake given both measurements, calculated using a measurement error model. After confounder adjustment the odds ratio (OR) per 10 g/day of alcohol intake was 1.05 (95 % CI 0.98, 1.13) using diet diaries, and 1.13 (1.02, 1.24) using FFQs. The calibrated FFQ measurement and combined measurements 1 and 2 gave ORs 1.10 (1.03, 1.18), 1.09 (1.01, 1.18), 1.09 (0.99,1.20), respectively. The association was modified by HRT use, being stronger among users versus non-users. In summary, using an alcohol measurement from a diet diary at one time point gave attenuated associations compared with FFQ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22644108     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-012-9693-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  43 in total

1.  Dietary folate consumption and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  T E Rohan; M G Jain; G R Howe; A B Miller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study.

Authors:  Victor Kipnis; Amy F Subar; Douglas Midthune; Laurence S Freedman; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Richard P Troiano; Sheila Bingham; Dale A Schoeller; Arthur Schatzkin; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Arthur Schatzkin; Douglas Midthune; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Dietary fat and breast cancer: comparison of results from food diaries and food-frequency questionnaires in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium.

Authors:  Timothy J Key; Paul N Appleby; Benjamin J Cairns; Robert Luben; Christina C Dahm; Tasnime Akbaraly; Eric J Brunner; Victoria Burley; Janet E Cade; Darren C Greenwood; Alison M Stephen; Gita Mishra; Diana Kuh; Ruth H Keogh; Ian R White; Amit Bhaniani; Gabor Borgulya; Angela A Mulligan; Kay Tee Khaw
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Dietary folate intake, alcohol, and risk of breast cancer in a prospective study of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  T A Sellers; L H Kushi; J R Cerhan; R A Vierkant; S M Gapstur; C M Vachon; J E Olson; T M Therneau; A R Folsom
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  A prospective study of folate intake and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  S Zhang; D J Hunter; S E Hankinson; E L Giovannucci; B A Rosner; G A Colditz; F E Speizer; W C Willett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The UK Women's Cohort Study: comparison of vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters.

Authors:  J E Cade; V J Burley; D C Greenwood
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.022

9.  Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer?

Authors:  Sheila A Bingham; Robert Luben; Ailsa Welch; Nicholas Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  A comparison of alternative measures of alcohol consumption in the Canadian National Survey of alcohol and drug use.

Authors:  E Single; S Wortley
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Fish intake or omega-3 fatty acids: greater than the sum of all parts?

Authors:  Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong; Rajiv Chowdhury; Oscar H Franco
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Fish intake is associated with slower cognitive decline in Chinese older adults.

Authors:  Bo Qin; Brenda L Plassman; Lloyd J Edwards; Barry M Popkin; Linda S Adair; Michelle A Mendez
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  Cancer Progress and Priorities: Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Serena C Houghton; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.090

5.  Validation of the Oxford WebQ Online 24-Hour Dietary Questionnaire Using Biomarkers.

Authors:  Darren C Greenwood; Laura J Hardie; Gary S Frost; Nisreen A Alwan; Kathryn E Bradbury; Michelle Carter; Paul Elliott; Charlotte E L Evans; Heather E Ford; Neil Hancock; Timothy J Key; Bette Liu; Michelle A Morris; Umme Z Mulla; Katerina Petropoulou; Gregory D M Potter; Elio Riboli; Heather Young; Petra A Wark; Janet E Cade
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Dietary patterns derived with multiple methods from food diaries and breast cancer risk in the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium.

Authors:  G K Pot; A M Stephen; C C Dahm; T J Key; B J Cairns; V J Burley; J E Cade; D C Greenwood; R H Keogh; A Bhaniani; A McTaggart; M A H Lentjes; G Mishra; E J Brunner; K T Khaw
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  A toolkit for measurement error correction, with a focus on nutritional epidemiology.

Authors:  Ruth H Keogh; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.373

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.