BACKGROUND: Our objectives were to: (1) compare colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) among US born citizens (USBs), naturalized citizens (NACs), and noncitizens (NOCs) and (2) evaluate clinical factors and potential barriers associated with CRCS in these populations. METHODS: Screening-eligible patients were identified from the 2007 California Health Interview Survey. Up-to-date CRCS was defined as a fecal occult blood test within 1 year, a sigmoidoscopy within 5 years, or a colonoscopy within 10 years. Using logistic regression, we determined the effects of immigrant status on CRCS. Stratified analyses based on location of residence, health insurance status, and English proficiency were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 30,434 average-risk adults aged 50 years or older completed the survey. Only 67% of USBs, 61% of NACs, and 46% of NOCs underwent CRCS. Advanced age, male sex, high-income earners, nonsmokers, and those who were married or visited their physicians frequently were more likely to receive CRCS (all P < 0.05). Compared with USBs, both NACs and NOCs showed decreased odds of CRCS (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.06 and odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.88, respectively; P = 0.011). Stratified analyses revealed that the associations between immigrants and decreased CRCS were more prominent for those who lived in rural areas, lacked insurance, or were not English proficient. CONCLUSIONS: CRCS remains suboptimal, especially in new US immigrants. Improving health care access and mitigating language barriers may minimize this disparity.
BACKGROUND: Our objectives were to: (1) compare colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) among US born citizens (USBs), naturalized citizens (NACs), and noncitizens (NOCs) and (2) evaluate clinical factors and potential barriers associated with CRCS in these populations. METHODS: Screening-eligible patients were identified from the 2007 California Health Interview Survey. Up-to-date CRCS was defined as a fecal occult blood test within 1 year, a sigmoidoscopy within 5 years, or a colonoscopy within 10 years. Using logistic regression, we determined the effects of immigrant status on CRCS. Stratified analyses based on location of residence, health insurance status, and English proficiency were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 30,434 average-risk adults aged 50 years or older completed the survey. Only 67% of USBs, 61% of NACs, and 46% of NOCs underwent CRCS. Advanced age, male sex, high-income earners, nonsmokers, and those who were married or visited their physicians frequently were more likely to receive CRCS (all P < 0.05). Compared with USBs, both NACs and NOCs showed decreased odds of CRCS (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.06 and odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.88, respectively; P = 0.011). Stratified analyses revealed that the associations between immigrants and decreased CRCS were more prominent for those who lived in rural areas, lacked insurance, or were not English proficient. CONCLUSIONS: CRCS remains suboptimal, especially in new US immigrants. Improving health care access and mitigating language barriers may minimize this disparity.
Authors: Caroline A Thompson; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Albert Chan; John K Chan; Sean R McClellan; Sukyung Chung; Cliff Olson; Vani Nimbal; Latha P Palaniappan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Mark C Hornbrook; Ran Goshen; Eran Choman; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rosetti; Yaron Kinar; Elizabeth G Liles; Kristal C Rust Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Deeonna E Farr; Leslie E Cofie; Alison T Brenner; Ronny A Bell; Daniel S Reuland Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 2.742
Authors: Mina Suh; Kui Son Choi; Hoo-Yeon Lee; Myung-Il Hahm; Yoon Young Lee; Jae Kwan Jun; Eun-Cheol Park Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 1.817