Literature DB >> 22642397

Fundamentals of randomized clinical trials in wound care: design and conduct.

Anne M Eskes1, Fleur E Brölmann, Bauer E Sumpio, Dieter Mayer, Zena Moore, Magnus S Agren, Michel Hermans, Keith Cutting, Dink A Legemate, Dirk T Ubbink, Hester Vermeulen.   

Abstract

The care for chronic and acute wounds is a substantial problem around the world. This has led to a plethora of products to accelerate healing. Unfortunately, the quality of studies evaluating the efficacy of such wound care products is frequently low. Randomized clinical trials are universally acknowledged as the study design of choice for comparing treatment effects, as they eliminate several sources of bias. We propose a framework for the design and conduct of future randomized clinical trials that will offer strong scientific evidence for the effectiveness of wound care interventions. While randomization is a necessary feature of a robust comparative study, it is not sufficient to ensure a study at low risk of bias. Randomized clinical trials should also ensure adequate allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessors, apply intention-to-treat analysis, and use patient-oriented outcomes. This article proposes strategies for improving the evidence base for wound care decision making.
© 2012 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22642397     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00799.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  5 in total

Review 1.  Human Wound-Healing Research: Issues and Perspectives for Studies Using Wide-Scale Analytic Platforms.

Authors:  Kristo Nuutila; Shintaro Katayama; Jyrki Vuola; Esko Kankuri
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Understanding the Hawthorne effect in wound research-A scoping review.

Authors:  Van Nb Nguyen; Charne Miller; Janine Sunderland; William McGuiness
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  What Do Patients Want? Patient Preference in Wound Care.

Authors:  Lisa Q Corbett; William J Ennis
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Rationale for participation in venous leg ulcer clinical research: Patient interview study.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Catelyn Richards; Louise Turnour; Victoria Team
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Funding source and the quality of reports of chronic wounds trials: 2004 to 2011.

Authors:  Robert Hodgson; Richard Allen; Ellen Broderick; J Martin Bland; Jo C Dumville; Rebecca Ashby; Sally Bell-Syer; Ruth Foxlee; Jill Hall; Karen Lamb; Mary Madden; Susan O'Meara; Nikki Stubbs; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.