Literature DB >> 22640369

Inferring facts from fiction: reading correct and incorrect information affects memory for related information.

Andrew C Butler1, Nancy A Dennis, Elizabeth J Marsh.   

Abstract

People can acquire both true and false knowledge about the world from fictional stories. The present study explored whether the benefits and costs of learning about the world from fictional stories extend beyond memory for directly stated pieces of information. Of interest was whether readers would use correct and incorrect story references to make deductive inferences about related information in the story, and then integrate those inferences into their knowledge bases. Participants read stories containing correct, neutral, and misleading references to facts about the world; each reference could be combined with another reference that occurred in a later sentence to make a deductive inference. Later they answered general knowledge questions that tested for these deductive inferences. The results showed that participants generated and retained the deductive inferences regardless of whether the inferences were consistent or inconsistent with world knowledge, and irrespective of whether the references were placed consecutively in the text or separated by many sentences. Readers learn more than what is directly stated in stories; they use references to the real world to make both correct and incorrect inferences that are integrated into their knowledge bases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22640369      PMCID: PMC3393771          DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2012.682067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  14 in total

1.  Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2002-12

2.  Semantic associations and elaborative inference.

Authors:  G McKoon; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Accessing distant premise information: how memory feeds reasoning.

Authors:  R Brooke Lea; Elizabeth J Mulligan; Jennifer Lee Walton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Memory for the pragmatic implications of sentences.

Authors:  W F Brewer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-11

5.  On-line evidence for elaborative logical inferences in text.

Authors:  R B Lea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Role of context in accessing distant information during reading.

Authors:  J E Albrecht; J L Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The malleability of human memory.

Authors:  E F Loftus
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1979 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.548

8.  Creating illusions of knowledge: learning errors that contradict prior knowledge.

Authors:  Lisa K Fazio; Sarah J Barber; Suparna Rajaram; Peter A Ornstein; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-05-21

9.  Going beyond the facts: young children extend knowledge by integrating episodes.

Authors:  Patricia J Bauer; Priscilla San Souci; P S Souci
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2010-12

10.  How do readers handle incorrect information during reading?

Authors:  David N Rapp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Self-derivation through memory integration: A model for accumulation of semantic knowledge.

Authors:  Patricia J Bauer; Alena G Esposito; James J Daly
Journal:  Learn Instr       Date:  2019-11-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.