Literature DB >> 22640366

Optimal design for the precise estimation of an interaction threshold: the impact of exposure to a mixture of 18 polyhalogenated aromatic hydrocarbons.

Sharon D Yeatts1, Chris Gennings, Kevin M Crofton.   

Abstract

Traditional additivity models provide little flexibility in modeling the dose-response relationships of the single agents in a mixture. While the flexible single chemical required (FSCR) methods allow greater flexibility, its implicit nature is an obstacle in the formation of the parameter covariance matrix, which forms the basis for many statistical optimality design criteria. The goal of this effort is to develop a method for constructing the parameter covariance matrix for the FSCR models, so that (local) alphabetic optimality criteria can be applied. Data from Crofton et al. are provided as motivation; in an experiment designed to determine the effect of 18 polyhalogenated aromatic hydrocarbons on serum total thyroxine (T(4)), the interaction among the chemicals was statistically significant. Gennings et al. fit the FSCR interaction threshold model to the data. The resulting estimate of the interaction threshold was positive and within the observed dose region, providing evidence of a dose-dependent interaction. However, the corresponding likelihood-ratio-based confidence interval was wide and included zero. In order to more precisely estimate the location of the interaction threshold, supplemental data are required. Using the available data as the first stage, the Ds-optimal second-stage design criterion was applied to minimize the variance of the hypothesized interaction threshold. Practical concerns associated with the resulting design are discussed and addressed using the penalized optimality criterion. Results demonstrate that the penalized Ds-optimal second-stage design can be used to more precisely define the interaction threshold while maintaining the characteristics deemed important in practice.
© 2012 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22640366      PMCID: PMC4035215          DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01834.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  10 in total

Review 1.  Health risk of low-dose pesticides mixtures: a review of the 1985-1998 literature on combination toxicology and health risk assessment.

Authors:  S A Carpy; W Kobel; J Doe
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 6.393

2.  Support of science-based decisions concerning the evaluation of the toxicology of mixtures: a new beginning.

Authors:  Linda Teuschler; James Klaunig; Ed Carney; Janice Chambers; Rory Conolly; Chris Gennings; John Giesy; Richard Hertzberg; Curtis Klaassen; Ralph Kodell; Dennis Paustenbach; Raymond Yang
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  A unifying concept for assessing toxicological interactions: changes in slope.

Authors:  C Gennings; W H Carter; R A Carchman; L K Teuschler; J E Simmons; E W Carney
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Confusion of concepts in mixture toxicology.

Authors:  W H Könemann; M N Pieters
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.023

5.  Current and future risk assessment guidelines, policy, and methods development for chemical mixtures.

Authors:  L K Teuschler; R C Hertzberg
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1995-12-28       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  The expected effect of a combination of agents: the general solution.

Authors:  M C Berenbaum
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1985-06-07       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  A novel flexible approach for evaluating fixed ratio mixtures of full and partial agonists.

Authors:  Chris Gennings; W Hans Carter; Edward W Carney; Grantley D Charles; B Bhaskar Gollapudi; Richard A Carchman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Chemical mixtures: considering the evolution of toxicology and chemical assessment.

Authors:  Emily Monosson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Thyroid-hormone-disrupting chemicals: evidence for dose-dependent additivity or synergism.

Authors:  Kevin M Crofton; Elena S Craft; Joan M Hedge; Chris Gennings; Jane E Simmons; Richard A Carchman; W Hans Carter; Michael J DeVito
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Combined exposure to anti-androgens exacerbates disruption of sexual differentiation in the rat.

Authors:  Ulla Hass; Martin Scholze; Sofie Christiansen; Majken Dalgaard; Anne Marie Vinggaard; Marta Axelstad; Stine Broeng Metzdorff; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.