Literature DB >> 22638827

Interspecific sexual isolation and phylogeny among different members of the Drosophila bipectinata species complex.

Parul Banerjee1, Bashisth N Singh.   

Abstract

The degree and pattern of sexual isolation among closely related species can be utilized for predicting the direction of evolution and deriving a phylogeny. The Drosophila bipectinata species complex is a group of four morphologically very similar species, belonging to the ananassae subgroup of the melanogaster species group. Sexual isolation among the members of this complex was studied by employing the male-choice technique. To test the difference between the homogamic and heterogamic matings, chi-square values were calculated under the assumption of random mating and the degree of sexual isolation was measured by estimating isolation index. To test the difference in proportions of heterogamic matings between reciprocal crosses, normal deviate (z) was calculated. The direction of evolution among these species has been discussed in the light of models proposed by different workers. Our results suggest that while D. bipectinata, Drosophila parabipectinata and Drosophila malerkotliana are closely related to each other, D. pseudoananassae is distantly related to these three species. The species pairs D. bipectinata and D. parabipectinata and D. parabipectinata and D. malerkotliana show asymmetrical sexual isolation. Based on this, it is suggested that D. bipectinata and D. malerkotliana share a common ancestor where as D. parabipectinata has been derived from D. bipectinata. Their phylogenetic relationship has been discussed in the light of phylogenies suggested by earlier workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22638827     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-012-9659-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  28 in total

1.  Gene flow between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.

Authors:  M A Noor; N A Johnson; J Hey
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Genetics and speciation.

Authors:  J A Coyne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  No character displacement for reproductive isolation between Drosophila bipectinata and Drosophila malerkotliana.

Authors:  B N Singh; S Chatterjee
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.166

4.  An introgression analysis of quantitative trait loci that contribute to a morphological difference between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana.

Authors:  C C Laurie; J R True; J Liu; J M Mercer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  ETHOLOGICAL ISOLATION AND PHYLOGENY IN THE PLANITIBIA SUBGROUP OF HAWAIIAN DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Kenneth Y Kaneshiro
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  WHY ASYMMETRIC MATING PREFERENCES MAY NOT SHOW THE DIRECTION OF EVOLUTION.

Authors:  G E E Moodie
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Analysis of mitochondrial DNA in two species of the bipectinata species complex of Drosophila.

Authors:  J P Gupta; T Aotsuka; A Inaba; O Kitagawa
Journal:  Jpn J Genet       Date:  1993-08

Review 8.  Drosophila bipectinata species complex.

Authors:  S Singh; B N Singh
Journal:  Indian J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 0.818

9.  Phylogeny of the Oriental Drosophila melanogaster species group: a multilocus reconstruction.

Authors:  Artyom Kopp; John R True
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  Asymmetric reproductive isolation between two sympatric annual killifish with extremely short lifespans.

Authors:  Matej Polačik; Martin Reichard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Sex-specific asymmetry in eye development in interspecific hybrids in the Drosophila bipectinata species complex.

Authors:  Bashisth N Singh; Parul Banerjee
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 2.  Role of sexual selection in speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Akanksha Singh; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Genome-wide comparative analysis of four Indian Drosophila species.

Authors:  Sujata Mohanty; Radhika Khanna
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.291

4.  Pattern of mating preference of interspecific hybrid females and phylogeny in the Drosophila bipectinata species complex.

Authors:  P Banerjee; B N Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  The Drosophila bipectinata species complex: degree of sterility and dystrophied ovaries in interspecific hybrid females.

Authors:  Parul Banerjee; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  The Drosophila bipectinata species complex: phylogenetic relationship among different members based on chromosomal variations.

Authors:  Parul Banerjee; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Interspecific hybridization does not affect the level of fluctuating asymmetry (FA) in the Drosophila bipectinata species complex.

Authors:  Parul Banerjee; B N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Intra- and interspecific comparison of protein polymorphism to establish genetic differentiation in two sympatric species of Drosophila: D. bipectinata and D. malerkotliana.

Authors:  Gurvachan Singh; Arvind Kumar Singh
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.893

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.