UNLABELLED: In order to update data underlying the Italian version of FRAX, we computed the national hip fracture incidence in Italy from hospitalization records for the year 2008. Mortality data and 10-year probabilities of major osteoporotic fractures were also updated. This revision will improve FRAX accuracy and reliability. INTRODUCTION: The original Italian version of FRAX® was based on five regional estimates of hip fracture risk undertaken up to 20 years previously. Our objective was to update hip fracture rates for the model with more recently derived data from the whole Italian population and more recent data on mortality. METHODS: We analyzed the Italian national hospitalization database for the year 2008 in order to compute age- and sex-specific hip fracture incidence rates. Re-hospitalisations of the same patients within 1 year were excluded from the analysis. Hip fracture incidence rates were computed for the age range of 40-100 years, whereas the original FRAX model lacked data on the youngest and oldest age groups. In addition, we used the national mortality data for the same year 2008 to update the model. Ten-year fracture probabilities were re-calculated on the basis of the new fracture incidence rates. RESULTS: The new hip fracture age- and sex-specific incidence rates were close to those used in the original FRAX tool, although some significant differences (not exceeding 25-30 %) were found for men aged 65-75 years and women under 55 years of age. In general, the revision resulted in decreased estimated 10-year probabilities in the younger age groups, whilst those in the older age groups were slightly increased. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of FRAX has been updated using the new fracture incidence rates. The impact of these revisions on FRAX is likely to increase the accuracy and reliability of FRAX in estimating 10-year fracture probabilities.
UNLABELLED: In order to update data underlying the Italian version of FRAX, we computed the national hip fracture incidence in Italy from hospitalization records for the year 2008. Mortality data and 10-year probabilities of major osteoporotic fractures were also updated. This revision will improve FRAX accuracy and reliability. INTRODUCTION: The original Italian version of FRAX® was based on five regional estimates of hip fracture risk undertaken up to 20 years previously. Our objective was to update hip fracture rates for the model with more recently derived data from the whole Italian population and more recent data on mortality. METHODS: We analyzed the Italian national hospitalization database for the year 2008 in order to compute age- and sex-specific hip fracture incidence rates. Re-hospitalisations of the same patients within 1 year were excluded from the analysis. Hip fracture incidence rates were computed for the age range of 40-100 years, whereas the original FRAX model lacked data on the youngest and oldest age groups. In addition, we used the national mortality data for the same year 2008 to update the model. Ten-year fracture probabilities were re-calculated on the basis of the new fracture incidence rates. RESULTS: The new hip fracture age- and sex-specific incidence rates were close to those used in the original FRAX tool, although some significant differences (not exceeding 25-30 %) were found for men aged 65-75 years and women under 55 years of age. In general, the revision resulted in decreased estimated 10-year probabilities in the younger age groups, whilst those in the older age groups were slightly increased. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of FRAX has been updated using the new fracture incidence rates. The impact of these revisions on FRAX is likely to increase the accuracy and reliability of FRAX in estimating 10-year fracture probabilities.
Authors: Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie Journal: CMAJ Date: 2010-10-12 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: P Piscitelli; G Iolascon; F Gimigliano; M Muratore; P Camboa; O Borgia; B Forcina; F Fitto; V Robaud; G Termini; G B Rini; E Gianicolo; A Faino; M Rossini; S Adami; A Angeli; A Distante; S Gatto; R Gimigliano; G Guida Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2006-10-24 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: S Tuzun; N Eskiyurt; U Akarirmak; M Saridogan; M Senocak; H Johansson; J A Kanis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: P Villa; A P Lassandro; M C Moruzzi; I D Amar; L Vacca; F Di Nardo; C De Waure; A Pontecorvi; G Scambia Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2015-07-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: A Mugisha; P Bergmann; V Kinnard; L Iconaru; F Baleanu; A Charles; M Surquin; S Rozenberg; F Benoit; J J Body Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Joao Pedro Pinho; Arturo Forner-Cordero; Rosa Maria Rodrigues Pereira; Arnaldo Jose Hernandez; Egidio Lima Dorea; Bruno Mezencio; Liliam Takayama; Jackeline Couto Alvarenga; Julio Cerca Serrao; Alberto Carlos Amadio Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 3.316
Authors: R Azagra; F López-Expósito; J C Martin-Sánchez; A Aguyé; N Moreno; C Cooper; A Díez-Pérez; E M Dennison Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 4.507