Weihui Li1, Andrew C Ahn. 1. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, USA. weihuil@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Input impedance is the frequency-dependent afterload to pulsatile blood flow. Studies of input impedance have been performed as early as the 1960s and have been applied to hypertension (HTN). However, to date, these studies have not been systematically evaluated. This systematic review aims to summarize the literature, interpret existing data from the perspective of impedance theory, and to discuss their potential for generating physiological insights into HTN. METHODS: We identified 11 studies wherein computed impedance moduli from both HTN and control (CNT) groups were reported. In addition, we performed bivariate analyses of raw data from three of these studies. RESULTS: Major findings include HTN groups had consistently elevated impedance moduli at 0 Hz (Z(0)) and at heart rate frequency (Z(1)), an increased frequency wherein impedance phase first crosses 0 (f(0)), but no consistent pattern in characteristic impedance (Z(c)), when compared to CNT groups; SBP and DBP are highly correlated with Z(0) and Z(1), moderately correlated with f(0), less correlated with Z(c); the measurement and calculation methods for Z(c) are varied and inconsistent; and a not insignificant proportion of hypertensive individuals have 'normal' Z(0), Z(1) and Z(c) values. These findings are limited by the heterogeneous study populations and small sample sizes. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that Z(0), Z(1) and f(0) are significantly associated with HTN, whereas the role of Z(c) is less clear. Additional studies are needed to evaluate these input impedance variables in order to generate substantial implications in clinic settings.
OBJECTIVE: Input impedance is the frequency-dependent afterload to pulsatile blood flow. Studies of input impedance have been performed as early as the 1960s and have been applied to hypertension (HTN). However, to date, these studies have not been systematically evaluated. This systematic review aims to summarize the literature, interpret existing data from the perspective of impedance theory, and to discuss their potential for generating physiological insights into HTN. METHODS: We identified 11 studies wherein computed impedance moduli from both HTN and control (CNT) groups were reported. In addition, we performed bivariate analyses of raw data from three of these studies. RESULTS: Major findings include HTN groups had consistently elevated impedance moduli at 0 Hz (Z(0)) and at heart rate frequency (Z(1)), an increased frequency wherein impedance phase first crosses 0 (f(0)), but no consistent pattern in characteristic impedance (Z(c)), when compared to CNT groups; SBP and DBP are highly correlated with Z(0) and Z(1), moderately correlated with f(0), less correlated with Z(c); the measurement and calculation methods for Z(c) are varied and inconsistent; and a not insignificant proportion of hypertensive individuals have 'normal' Z(0), Z(1) and Z(c) values. These findings are limited by the heterogeneous study populations and small sample sizes. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that Z(0), Z(1) and f(0) are significantly associated with HTN, whereas the role of Z(c) is less clear. Additional studies are needed to evaluate these input impedance variables in order to generate substantial implications in clinic settings.
Authors: Gary F Mitchell; Mark A van Buchem; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; John D Gotal; Maria K Jonsdottir; Ólafur Kjartansson; Melissa Garcia; Thor Aspelund; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer Journal: Brain Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: W W Nichols; M F O'Rourke; A P Avolio; T Yaginuma; J P Murgo; C J Pepine; C R Conti Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1985-04-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Gary F Mitchell; Yves Lacourcière; Jean-Pascal Ouellet; Joseph L Izzo; Joel Neutel; Linda J Kerwin; Alan J Block; Marc A Pfeffer Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J P Merillon; G J Fontenier; J F Lerallut; M Y Jaffrin; G A Motte; C P Genain; R R Gourgon Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 1982-11 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: J P Merillon; Y Lebras; J Chastre; J F Lerallut; G Motte; G Fontenier; Y Huet; M Y Jaffrin; R Gourgon Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 1983-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: M Umar Qureshi; Mitchel J Colebank; David A Schreier; Diana M Tabima; Mansoor A Haider; Naomi C Chesler; Mette S Olufsen Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 2.833