Literature DB >> 22633877

Genome-wide comparative analysis of simple sequence coding repeats among 25 insect species.

Susanta K Behura1, David W Severson.   

Abstract

We present a detailed genome-scale comparative analysis of simple sequence repeats within protein coding regions among 25 insect genomes. The repetitive sequences in the coding regions primarily represented single codon repeats and codon pair repeats. The CAG triplet is highly repetitive in the coding regions of insect genomes. It is frequently paired with the synonymous codon CAA to code for polyglutamine repeats. The codon pairs that are least repetitive code for polyalanine repeats. The frequency of hexanucleotide and dinucleotide motifs of codon pair repeats is significantly (p<0.001) different in the Drosophila species compared to the non-Drosophila species. However, the frequency of synonymous and non-synonymous codon pair repeats varies in a correlated manner (r(2)=0.79) among all the species. Results further show that perfect and imperfect repeats have significant association with the trinucleotide and hexanucleotide coding repeats in most of these insects. However, only select species show significant association between the numbers of perfect/imperfect hexamers and repeat coding for single amino acid/amino acid pair runs. Our data further suggests that genes containing simple sequence coding repeats may be under negative selection as they tend to be poorly conserved across species. The sequences of coding repeats of orthologous genes vary according to the known phylogeny among the species. In conclusion, the study shows that simple sequence coding repeats are important features of genome diversity among insects.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22633877      PMCID: PMC3383938          DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  38 in total

1.  Domain-level differences in microsatellite distribution and content result from different relative rates of insertion and deletion mutations.

Authors:  David Metzgar; Li Liu; Christian Hansen; Kevin Dybvig; Christopher Wills
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review.

Authors:  L Zane; L Bargelloni; T Patarnello
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  RevTrans: Multiple alignment of coding DNA from aligned amino acid sequences.

Authors:  Rasmus Wernersson; Anders Gorm Pedersen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Neurological proteins are not enriched for repetitive sequences.

Authors:  Melanie A Huntley; G Brian Golding
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Open source clustering software.

Authors:  M J L de Hoon; S Imoto; J Nolan; S Miyano
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  The relationship between microsatellite slippage mutation rate and the number of repeat units.

Authors:  Yinglei Lai; Fengzhu Sun
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 8.  Mini- and microsatellite expansions: the recombination connection.

Authors:  G F Richard; F Pâques
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.807

9.  Differential distribution of simple sequence repeats in eukaryotic genome sequences.

Authors:  M V Katti; P K Ranjekar; V S Gupta
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Evolution of simple sequence in proteins.

Authors:  M Huntley; G B Golding
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  7 in total

1.  Motif mismatches in microsatellites: insights from genome-wide investigation among 20 insect species.

Authors:  Susanta K Behura; David W Severson
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.458

2.  Association of microsatellite pairs with segmental duplications in insect genomes.

Authors:  Susanta K Behura; David W Severson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Profiles of low complexity regions in Apicomplexa.

Authors:  Fabia U Battistuzzi; Kristan A Schneider; Matthew K Spencer; David Fisher; Sophia Chaudhry; Ananias A Escalante
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  APMicroDB: A microsatellite database of Acyrthosiphon pisum.

Authors:  Ritika Bishnoi; Deepak Singla
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2017-03-30

5.  Comparison of the Microsatellite Distribution Patterns in the Genomes of Euarchontoglires at the Taxonomic Level.

Authors:  Xuhao Song; Tingbang Yang; Xinyi Zhang; Ying Yuan; Xianghui Yan; Yi Wei; Jun Zhang; Caiquan Zhou
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  iMSAT: a novel approach to the development of microsatellite loci using barcoded Illumina libraries.

Authors:  Jeremy C Andersen; Nicholas J Mills
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Large-scale analysis reveals that the genome features of simple sequence repeats are generally conserved at the family level in insects.

Authors:  Simin Ding; Shuping Wang; Kang He; Mingxing Jiang; Fei Li
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.