Literature DB >> 2263364

Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.

D B Elliott1, D Whitaker, L Bonette.   

Abstract

One disadvantage of using high-contrast letters as test objects when measuring visual acuity is the fact that they are not of equal legibility. A number of charts are now commercially available that assess contrast sensitivity using letter targets. This study attempted to assess the legibility of letters at contrast threshold on the Pelli-Robson letter contrast sensitivity chart by determining the percentage of correct responses for each of the ten Sloan letters at contrast threshold. Results of 493 contrast sensitivity measurements taken in optometric practice indicated that there is a definite difference in legibility between letters at contrast threshold as for letters at acuity threshold. The data suggest that the probability of correctly identifying two out of a group of three letters at threshold on the Pelli-Robson chart varies between 67% and 97% due to letter type alone. Because of the very regular and pronounced miscalling of the letter C as an O, we suggest that this should be accepted as a correct call during threshold measurements on the Pelli-Robson chart. This helps to balance the legibility of different groups of letters.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2263364     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1990.tb00877.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  20 in total

1.  The midget pathways of the primate retina.

Authors:  Helga Kolb; David Marshak
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device.

Authors:  L Tejeria; R A Harper; P H Artes; C M Dickinson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Are normally sighted, visually impaired, and blind pedestrians accurate and reliable at making street crossing decisions?

Authors:  Shirin E Hassan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise.

Authors:  Cierra Hall; Shu Wang; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Dynamics of retinal function after multiple photodynamic therapies in age-related macular degeneration: a report of cases.

Authors:  Beatrix Feigl; Brian Brown; Jan Lovie-Kitchin; Lawrence Lee
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Urban and rural differences in older drivers' failure to stop at stop signs.

Authors:  Lisa Keay; Srichand Jasti; Beatriz Munoz; Kathleen A Turano; Cynthia A Munro; Donald D Duncan; Kevin Baldwin; Karen J Bandeen-Roche; Emily W Gower; Sheila K West
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2009-06-21

7.  Older drivers and rapid deceleration events: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Driving Study.

Authors:  Lisa Keay; Beatriz Munoz; Donald D Duncan; Daniel Hahn; Kevin Baldwin; Kathleen A Turano; Cynthia A Munro; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Sheila K West
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2012-06-27

8.  Predictors of lane-change errors in older drivers.

Authors:  Cynthia A Munro; Joan Jefferys; Emily W Gower; Beatriz E Muñoz; Constantine G Lyketsos; Lisa Keay; Kathleen A Turano; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Sheila K West
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening.

Authors:  Shuang Song; Dennis M Levi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Measurements of street-crossing decision-making in pedestrians with low vision.

Authors:  Shirin E Hassan; Robert W Massof
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2012-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.