Literature DB >> 22632794

Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.

Victoria Reynolds1, Ali Buckland, Jean Bailey, Jodi Lipscombe, Elizabeth Nathan, Shyan Vijayasekaran, Rona Kelly, Youri Maryn, Noel French.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Instrumental measures of voice allow practitioners to assess the severity of voice disorders and objectively measure treatment outcomes. Instrumental measures should be calculated on both sustained vowel and connected speech samples to ensure ecological validity. However, there is a lack of appropriate, validated acoustic measurements for use in the pediatric population. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is a multivariate acoustic measure of dysphonia that has been found to be reliable, valid, and have diagnostic accuracy and response to change in an adult population. This study aimed to evaluate the AVQI in a pediatric population. STUDY
DESIGN: This study was a prospective observational study of a sample of dysphonic and normophonic children.
METHODS: Sixty-seven preterm participants (born at less than 25 weeks gestation) aged between 6 and 15 years were recruited. Participants were excluded because of either inability to comply with task requirements or other speech-related factors that affected acoustic measurement. Forty normophonic term-born participants aged between 5 and 15 years were also recruited. AVQI analysis was conducted on a prolonged vowel sample and a sample of continuous speech.
RESULTS: The AVQI was found to have diagnostic accuracy and specificity in this population of children with and without dysphonia. It was moderately correlated with ratings of severity on the GRBAS (overall grade of hoarseness (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B), aesthenicity (A), and strain (S)), a subjective rating scale. The threshold for pathology of this sample of 3.46 showed strong sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, with good-to-excellent likelihood ratios.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the AVQI has diagnostic accuracy in a pediatric population, suggesting that it is an appropriate assessment tool to determine the presence and severity of pediatric voice disorders.
Copyright © 2012 The Voice Foundation. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22632794     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  7 in total

1.  The value of the acoustic voice quality index as a measure of dysphonia severity in subjects speaking different languages.

Authors:  Youri Maryn; Marc De Bodt; Ben Barsties; Nelson Roy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Effects of added absorption on the vocal exertions of talkers in a reverberant room.

Authors:  Michael K Rollins; Timothy W Leishman; Jennifer K Whiting; Eric J Hunter; Dennis L Eggett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Exploring the feasibility of the combination of acoustic voice quality index and glottal function index for voice pathology screening.

Authors:  Nora Ulozaite-Staniene; Tadas Petrauskas; Viktoras Šaferis; Virgilijus Uloza
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Test-retest variability and internal consistency of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index].

Authors:  B Barsties; Y Maryn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  GALP Qualifier Scale: Initial Considerations to Classify a Voice Problem.

Authors:  Marina Englert; Viviana Mendoza; Mara Behlau; Marc De Bodt
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 0.849

6.  The Perception of Breathiness in the Voices of Pediatric Speakers.

Authors:  Lisa M Kopf; Mark D Skowronski; Supraja Anand; David A Eddins; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.

Authors:  Virgilijus Uloza; Ben Barsties V Latoszek; Nora Ulozaite-Staniene; Tadas Petrauskas; Youri Maryn
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.