Literature DB >> 22628457

Content and timing of antenatal care: predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of antenatal care trajectories.

Katrien Beeckman1, Fred Louckx, Koen Putman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When examining risk factors for inadequate antenatal care, the assessment of antenatal care hardly considers the content and timing of interventions during pregnancy. This study aims to provide information about the importance of predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants on the received content and timing of antenatal care.
METHODS: In the Brussels Metropolitan Region, 333 women were consecutively recruited at the beginning of their pregnancies. Antenatal care use was recorded prospectively. A classification system measuring the content and timing of care during pregnancy (CTP) divided the women into four categories. Ordinal regression analyses were applied to define unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs), measuring the effect of different determinants on being assigned to a higher CTP category.
RESULTS: A total of 10.2% of the women had an inadequate, 8.4% an intermediate, 36% a sufficient and 45.3% an appropriate antenatal care trajectory. Adjusted ORs showed a lower likelihood of being assigned to a higher CTP category for lower educated women (OR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.37-0.92), women of Maghreb origin (OR: 0.38; 95% CI 0.22-0.66) and women with a higher discontinuity of care (OR: 0.56; 95% CI 0.34-0.90).
CONCLUSIONS: When controlling for confounders, no enabling determinants were found that affect the content and timing of care in pregnancy. Although antenatal care is equally available to all women, predisposing and pregnancy-related factors were related to the likelihood of completing an appropriate antenatal care trajectory. Besides stimulating knowledge about the importance of antenatal care in less-educated and Maghreb women, supporting continuity of care during pregnancy might result in higher levels of received antenatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22628457     DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cks020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Public Health        ISSN: 1101-1262            Impact factor:   3.367


  12 in total

1.  Measuring antenatal care use in Europe: is the content and timing of care in pregnancy tool applicable?

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Lucy Frith; Helga Gottfreðsdóttir; Annette Bernloehr
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Associations of Household Wealth and Individual Literacy with Prenatal Care in Ten West African Countries.

Authors:  Yhenneko J Taylor; Sarah B Laditka; James N Laditka; Larissa R Brunner Huber; Elizabeth F Racine
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

3.  Risk Factors for Non-use of Skilled Birth Attendants: Analysis of South Sudan Household Survey, 2010.

Authors:  Ngatho Samuel Mugo; Kingsley E Agho; Michael J Dibley
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-06

4.  Assessing the continuum of care for maternal health in Mexico, 1994-2018.

Authors:  Edson Serván-Mori; Ileana Heredia-Pi; Diego Cerecero García; Gustavo Nigenda; Sandra G Sosa-Rubí; Jacqueline A Seiglie; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Mining care trajectories using health administrative information systems: the use of state sequence analysis to assess disparities in prenatal care consumption.

Authors:  Nolwenn Le Meur; Fei Gao; Sahar Bayat
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Explanatory factors for first and second-generation non-western women's inadequate prenatal care utilisation: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Agatha W Boerleider; Judith Manniën; Cherelle M V van Stenus; Therese A Wiegers; Esther I Feijen-de Jong; Evelien R Spelten; Walter L J M Devillé
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Prevalence and risk factors for non-use of antenatal care visits: analysis of the 2010 South Sudan household survey.

Authors:  Ngatho S Mugo; Michael J Dibley; Kingsley E Agho
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Measuring the adequacy of antenatal health care: a national cross-sectional study in Mexico.

Authors:  Ileana Heredia-Pi; Edson Servan-Mori; Blair G Darney; Hortensia Reyes-Morales; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  Antenatal care use in urban areas in two European countries: Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants in Belgium and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jana Vanden Broeck; Esther Feijen-de Jong; Trudy Klomp; Koen Putman; Katrien Beeckman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  The Impact of Scientific and Technical Training on Improving Routine Collection of Antenatal Care Data for Maternal and Foetal Risk Assessment: A Case Study in the Province of South Kalimantan, Indonesia.

Authors:  Dewi Anggraini; Mali Abdollahian; Kaye Marion; Supri Nuryani; Fadly Ramadhan; Rezky Putri Rahayu; Irfan Rizki Rachman; Widya Wurianto
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2018-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.