INTRODUCTION: Lung nodules are commonly encountered in clinical practice, yet little is known about their management in community settings. An automated method for identifying patients with lung nodules would greatly facilitate research in this area. METHODS: Using members of a large, community-based health plan from 2006 to 2010, we developed a method to identify patients with lung nodules, by combining five diagnostic codes, four procedural codes, and a natural language processing algorithm that performed free text searches of radiology transcripts. An experienced pulmonologist reviewed a random sample of 116 radiology transcripts, providing a reference standard for the natural language processing algorithm. RESULTS: With the use of an automated method, we identified 7112 unique members as having one or more incident lung nodules. The mean age of the patients was 65 years (standard deviation 14 years). There were slightly more women (54%) than men, and Hispanics and non-whites comprised 45% of the lung nodule cohort. Thirty-six percent were never smokers whereas 11% were current smokers. Fourteen percent of the patients were subsequently diagnosed with lung cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of the natural language processing algorithm for identifying the presence of lung nodules were 96% and 86%, respectively, compared with clinician review. Among the true positive transcripts in the validation sample, only 35% were solitary and unaccompanied by one or more associated findings, and 56% measured 8 to 30 mm in diameter. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of diagnostic codes, procedural codes, and a natural language processing algorithm for free text searching of radiology reports can accurately and efficiently identify patients with incident lung nodules, many of whom are subsequently diagnosed with lung cancer.
INTRODUCTION: Lung nodules are commonly encountered in clinical practice, yet little is known about their management in community settings. An automated method for identifying patients with lung nodules would greatly facilitate research in this area. METHODS: Using members of a large, community-based health plan from 2006 to 2010, we developed a method to identify patients with lung nodules, by combining five diagnostic codes, four procedural codes, and a natural language processing algorithm that performed free text searches of radiology transcripts. An experienced pulmonologist reviewed a random sample of 116 radiology transcripts, providing a reference standard for the natural language processing algorithm. RESULTS: With the use of an automated method, we identified 7112 unique members as having one or more incident lung nodules. The mean age of the patients was 65 years (standard deviation 14 years). There were slightly more women (54%) than men, and Hispanics and non-whites comprised 45% of the lung nodule cohort. Thirty-six percent were never smokers whereas 11% were current smokers. Fourteen percent of the patients were subsequently diagnosed with lung cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of the natural language processing algorithm for identifying the presence of lung nodules were 96% and 86%, respectively, compared with clinician review. Among the true positive transcripts in the validation sample, only 35% were solitary and unaccompanied by one or more associated findings, and 56% measured 8 to 30 mm in diameter. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of diagnostic codes, procedural codes, and a natural language processing algorithm for free text searching of radiology reports can accurately and efficiently identify patients with incident lung nodules, many of whom are subsequently diagnosed with lung cancer.
Authors: Heber MacMahon; John H M Austin; Gordon Gamsu; Christian J Herold; James R Jett; David P Naidich; Edward F Patz; Stephen J Swensen Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Julie A Womack; Matthew Scotch; Cynthia Gibert; Wendy Chapman; Michael Yin; Amy C Justice; Cynthia Brandt Journal: Perspect Health Inf Manag Date: 2010-10-01
Authors: Michael K Gould; James Fletcher; Mark D Iannettoni; William R Lynch; David E Midthun; David P Naidich; David E Ost Journal: Chest Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Adi V Gundlapalli; Brett R South; Shobha Phansalkar; Anita Y Kinney; Shuying Shen; Sylvain Delisle; Trish Perl; Matthew H Samore Journal: Summit Transl Bioinform Date: 2008-03-01
Authors: Christopher G Slatore; Nanda Horeweg; James R Jett; David E Midthun; Charles A Powell; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Juan P Wisnivesky; Michael K Gould Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Seelwan Sathitratanacheewin; Helene Starks; Robert Y Lee; Erin K Kross; Lois Downey; James Sibley; William Lober; Elizabeth T Loggers; James A Fausto; Charlotta Lindvall; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: W Katherine Tan; Saeed Hassanpour; Patrick J Heagerty; Sean D Rundell; Pradeep Suri; Hannu T Huhdanpaa; Kathryn James; David S Carrell; Curtis P Langlotz; Nancy L Organ; Eric N Meier; Karen J Sherman; David F Kallmes; Patrick H Luetmer; Brent Griffith; David R Nerenz; Jeffrey G Jarvik Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Michelle R Ananda-Rajah; Christoph Bergmeir; François Petitjean; Monica A Slavin; Karin A Thursky; Geoffrey I Webb Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2017-11
Authors: Michael K Gould; Lori C Sakoda; Debra P Ritzwoller; Michael J Simoff; Christine M Neslund-Dudas; Lawrence H Kushi; Lisa Carter-Harris; Heather Spencer Feigelson; George Minowada; V Paul Doria-Rose Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-12
Authors: Joeky T Senders; Aditya V Karhade; David J Cote; Alireza Mehrtash; Nayan Lamba; Aislyn DiRisio; Ivo S Muskens; William B Gormley; Timothy R Smith; Marike L D Broekman; Omar Arnaout Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2019-04
Authors: Daniel R Murphy; Louis Wu; Eric J Thomas; Samuel N Forjuoh; Ashley N D Meyer; Hardeep Singh Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 44.544