Literature DB >> 11818846

Co-culture of osteoblasts with immature dural cells causes an increased rate and degree of osteoblast differentiation.

Jason A Spector1, Joshua A Greenwald, Stephen M Warren, Pierre J Bouletreau, Francesca E Crisera, Babak J Mehrara, Michael T Longaker.   

Abstract

For decades surgeons have exploited the ability of infants to reossify large calvarial defects. To demonstrate the role of dura mater-osteoblast communication during the process of calvarial reossification, the authors used a novel in vitro system that recapitulates the in vivo anatomic relationship of these cell populations. Primary cultures of osteoblast cells from 2-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat pups were grown on six-well plates, and cultures of immature, non-suture-associated dura mater cells from 6-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat pups were grown on Transwell inserts. When the osteoblast and dura mater cell cultures reached confluence, they were combined. This Transwell co-culture system permitted the two cell populations to grow together in the same well, but it prevented direct cell-to-cell contact. Therefore, the authors were able to determine, for the first time, whether paracrine signaling from immature, non-suture-associated dura mater could influence the biologic activity of osteoblasts. Osteoblasts co-cultured with dural cells proliferated significantly faster after 2 days (2.1 x 10(5) +/- 2.4 x 10(4) versus 1.4 x 10(5) +/- 2.2 x 10(4), p < or = 0.05) and 4 days (3.1 x 10(5) +/- 5 x 10(4) versus 2.2 x 10(5) +/- 4.0 x 10(4), p < or = 0.01) than did osteoblasts cultured alone. After 20 days, co-cultured osteoblasts expressed greater amounts of mRNA for several markers of osteoblast differentiation, including collagen I alpha I (4-fold), alkaline phosphatase (2.5-fold), osteopontin (3-fold), and osteocalcin (4-fold), than did osteoblasts cultured alone. After 30 days, co-cultured osteoblasts produced bone nodules that were significantly greater both in number (324 +/- 29 nodules versus 252 +/- 29 nodules per well, p , < or = 0.04) and total area of nodules (65 +/- 11 mm(2) versus 24 +/- 1.6 mm(2), p < or = 0.003) than osteoblasts cultured alone. To begin to understand how dural cells effect changes in osteoblast gene expression, the authors compared the expression of candidate genes, transforming growth factor beta 1 and fibroblast growth factor 2, in dural cells and osteoblasts before and after 5 days of culture. Interestingly, the dura mater produced marked amounts of these osteogenic cytokines compared with osteoblasts.The described co-culture system demonstrated that co-cultured osteoblasts proliferated more rapidly and experienced an increased rate and degree of cellular maturation than did osteoblasts cultured alone. The authors hypothesize that this effect was due to paracrine signaling (e.g., transforming growth factor beta 1 and fibroblast growth factor 2) from the dura mater, and they are investigating those mechanisms in ongoing experiments. Collectively these data verify that immature, non-suture-associated dura mater can influence the biologic activity of osteoblasts. Moreover, the production of cytokines derived from the dura mater (e.g., transforming growth factor beta 1 and fibroblast growth factor 2), and they may begin to explain why immature animals and infants with intact dura mater can reossify large calvarial defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11818846     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200202000-00033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  Tissue interactions between craniosynostotic dura mater and bone.

Authors:  Gregory M Cooper; Emily L Durham; James J Cray; Michael I Siegel; Joseph E Losee; Mark P Mooney
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  A novel ciliopathic skull defect arising from excess neural crest.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Tabler; Christopher P Rice; Karen J Liu; John B Wallingford
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  Dura mater stimulates human adipose-derived stromal cells to undergo bone formation in mouse calvarial defects.

Authors:  Benjamin Levi; Emily R Nelson; Shuli Li; Aaron W James; Jeong S Hyun; Daniel T Montoro; Min Lee; Jason P Glotzbach; George W Commons; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.277

4.  Paracrine interaction between adipose-derived stromal cells and cranial suture-derived mesenchymal cells.

Authors:  Aaron W James; Benjamin Levi; George W Commons; Jason Glotzbach; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Osteogenesis of Crouzon-Mutated Cells in an Experimental Model.

Authors:  Andre Alcon; Philipp Metzler; Jacob Eswarakumar; Alexander T Wilson; Derek M Steinbacher
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Testing the critical size in calvarial bone defects: revisiting the concept of a critical-size defect.

Authors:  Gregory M Cooper; Mark P Mooney; Arun K Gosain; Phil G Campbell; Joseph E Losee; Johnny Huard
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Human adipose-derived stromal cells stimulate autogenous skeletal repair via paracrine Hedgehog signaling with calvarial osteoblasts.

Authors:  Benjamin Levi; Aaron W James; Emily R Nelson; Shuli Li; Michelle Peng; George W Commons; Min Lee; Benjamin Wu; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.272

8.  Impaired meningeal development in association with apical expansion of calvarial bone osteogenesis in the Foxc1 mutant.

Authors:  Philaiporn Vivatbutsiri; Shizuko Ichinose; Marjo Hytönen; Kirsi Sainio; Kazuhiro Eto; Sachiko Iseki
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Proliferative capacity and osteogenic potential of novel dura mater stem cells on poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid.

Authors:  Caren Petrie; Sunil Tholpady; Roy Ogle; Edward Botchwey
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Wnt5a can both activate and repress Wnt/β-catenin signaling during mouse embryonic development.

Authors:  Renée van Amerongen; Christophe Fuerer; Makiko Mizutani; Roel Nusse
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.582

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.