Danny Dvir1, Ifat Lavi1, Hélène Eltchaninoff2, Dominique Himbert3, Yaron Almagor4, Fleur Descoutures3, Alec Vahanian3, Christophe Tron2, Alain Cribier2, Ran Kornowski5. 1. Department of Cardiology, Institute of Interventional Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2. Department of Cardiology, Charles Nicolle Hospital, University of Rouen, Rouen, France. 3. Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France. 4. Department of Cardiology, Sha'are Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 5. Department of Cardiology, Institute of Interventional Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Electronic address: rkornowski@clalit.org.il.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the exact location of Edwards SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) devices in different stages of implantation and to quantify possible operator-independent device movement during final deployment. BACKGROUND: Accurate device positioning during transcatheter aortic valve implantation is crucial in order to achieve optimal results. METHODS: This multicenter study consisted of 68 procedures with reliable pacemaker capture. Device positions were assessed using fluoroscopic images and the C-THV system (Paieon Medical, Rosh Ha'Ayin, Israel). RESULTS: The location after implantation was significantly higher than in the final stage of rapid pacing: 16.7 ± 16.3% of device height below the plane of the lower sinus border versus 32.6 ± 13.8%, p < 0.0001. Operator-independent device-center upper movement during final deployment was 2 ± 1.43 mm, range: -1.3 to 4.6 mm. Device movement was asymmetrical, occurring more in the lower part of the device than in its upper part (3.2 ± 1.4 mm vs. 0.75 ± 1.5 mm, p < 0.001), resulting in device shortening. Multivariate analysis revealed that moderate and severe aortic valve calcification had 49% higher upward movement than mild calcification (p = 0.03), and aortic sinus volume was negatively correlated with movement size (r = -0.35, p = 0.005). This movement was independent of device version (SAPIEN vs. SAPIEN XT), procedural access (transfemoral vs. transapical), and interventricular septum width. CONCLUSIONS: The final Edwards SAPIEN position is mostly aortic in relation to the lower sinus border. There is an operator-independent upward movement of the device center during the final stage of implantation. Anticipated upward movement of the device should influence its positioning before final deployment.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the exact location of Edwards SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) devices in different stages of implantation and to quantify possible operator-independent device movement during final deployment. BACKGROUND: Accurate device positioning during transcatheter aortic valve implantation is crucial in order to achieve optimal results. METHODS: This multicenter study consisted of 68 procedures with reliable pacemaker capture. Device positions were assessed using fluoroscopic images and the C-THV system (Paieon Medical, Rosh Ha'Ayin, Israel). RESULTS: The location after implantation was significantly higher than in the final stage of rapid pacing: 16.7 ± 16.3% of device height below the plane of the lower sinus border versus 32.6 ± 13.8%, p < 0.0001. Operator-independent device-center upper movement during final deployment was 2 ± 1.43 mm, range: -1.3 to 4.6 mm. Device movement was asymmetrical, occurring more in the lower part of the device than in its upper part (3.2 ± 1.4 mm vs. 0.75 ± 1.5 mm, p < 0.001), resulting in device shortening. Multivariate analysis revealed that moderate and severe aortic valve calcification had 49% higher upward movement than mild calcification (p = 0.03), and aortic sinus volume was negatively correlated with movement size (r = -0.35, p = 0.005). This movement was independent of device version (SAPIEN vs. SAPIEN XT), procedural access (transfemoral vs. transapical), and interventricular septum width. CONCLUSIONS: The final Edwards SAPIEN position is mostly aortic in relation to the lower sinus border. There is an operator-independent upward movement of the device center during the final stage of implantation. Anticipated upward movement of the device should influence its positioning before final deployment.
Authors: Thomas T Poels; Patrick Houthuizen; Leen A F M Van Garsse; Jos G Maessen; Peter de Jaegere; Frits W Prinzen Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Matteo Bianchi; Gil Marom; Ram P Ghosh; Harold A Fernandez; James R Taylor; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein Journal: Artif Organs Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.094
Authors: Rebecca T Hahn; Susheel Kodali; E Murat Tuzcu; Martin B Leon; Samir Kapadia; Deepika Gopal; Stamatios Lerakis; Brian R Lindman; Zuyue Wang; John Webb; Vinod H Thourani; Pamela S Douglas Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-03
Authors: Robert M A van der Boon; Patrick Houthuizen; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Frits Prinzen; Peter P T de Jaegere Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Diana E Litmanovich; Eduard Ghersin; David A Burke; Jeffrey Popma; Maryam Shahrzad; Alexander A Bankier Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2014-01-21