Literature DB >> 22624896

Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens.

Jorge L Alió1, Ana B Plaza-Puche, Raúl Montalban, Jaime Javaloy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and intraocular optical quality in patients with a low-addition (add) power multifocal refractive intraocular lens (IOL) with rotational asymmetry and a single-optic accommodating IOL.
SETTING: Vissum Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Miguel Hérnandez University, Alicante, Spain.
DESIGN: Prospective comparative nonrandomized consecutive case series.
METHODS: Consecutive cataract patients had implantation of a low-add-power refractive multifocal IOL with rotational asymmetry (Lentis-Mplus LS-312 MF15) (multifocal group) or a single-optic accommodating IOL (Crystalens HD) (accommodating group). Distance and near visual acuities were evaluated. Ocular optical quality, intraocular aberrations, defocus curve, and contrast sensitivity were evaluated postoperatively.
RESULTS: Of the 66 eyes (40 patients; age 61 to 81 years), 31 were in the multifocal group and 35 were in the accommodating group. Postoperatively, both groups had a significant improvement in the uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities and uncorrected (UNVA) and corrected near (CNVA) near visual acuities (P <.01). Distance-corrected near visual acuity was significantly better in the multifocal group postoperatively (P ≤.04). No significant differences in UNVA and CNVA were detected postoperatively (P ≥.09). In the defocus curve, the multifocal group had significantly better visual acuities at several defocus levels. The accommodating group had better contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions at all spatial frequencies (P ≤.04). The multifocal group had significantly higher postoperative intraocular tilt (P <.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Both IOLs restored distance vision. The refractive multifocal IOL provided better near visual rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22624896     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  16 in total

1.  Quality of vision, patient satisfaction and long-term visual function after bilateral implantation of a low addition multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Emilio Pedrotti; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Jacopo Bonetto; Christian Demasi; Francesco Aiello; Carlo Nucci; Cesare Mariotti; Giorgio Marchini
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Perceived image quality with simulated segmented bifocal corrections.

Authors:  Carlos Dorronsoro; Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Pablo de Gracia; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  [Clinical results after implantation of a new segmental refractive multifocal intraocular lens].

Authors:  B C Thomas; G U Auffarth; R Philips; J Novák; J Blazek; H Adamkova; T M Rabsilber
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Visual and optical performances of multifocal intraocular lenses with three different near additions: 6-month follow-up.

Authors:  Mengmeng Wang; Christine Carole C Corpuz; Megumi Fujiwara; Minoru Tomita
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2015-01-30

5.  Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Sadoughi; Bahram Einollahi; Danial Roshandel; Mohammad Sarimohammadli; Sepehr Feizi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

6.  Clinical Evaluation of Functional Vision of +1.5 Diopters near Addition, Aspheric, Rotational Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Florian Tobias Alwin Kretz; Rahmin Khoramnia; Mary Safwat Attia; Michael Janusz Koss; Katharina Linz; Gerd Uwe Auffarth
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-29

7.  Prospective evaluation of visual outcomes with three presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Re Ang; Ga Martinez; Em Cruz; Aa Tiongson; Ag Dela Cruz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-17

Review 8.  Refractive lens exchange in modern practice: when and when not to do it?

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Andrzej Grzybowski; Dorota Romaniuk
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-10

9.  Evaluation of Different Power of Near Addition in Two Different Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Ugur Unsal; Gonen Baser
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 10.  Accommodative intraocular lenses: where are we and where we are going.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Alfredo Vega-Estrada
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.