PURPOSE: To develop and validate a computational model that simulates (1) tissue heating with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and (2) resulting hyperthermia-mediated drug delivery from temperature-sensitive liposomes (TSL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: HIFU heating in tissue was simulated using a heat transfer model based on the bioheat equation, including heat-induced cessation of perfusion. A spatio-temporal multi-compartment pharmacokinetic model simulated intravascular release of doxorubicin from TSL, its transport into interstitium, and cell uptake. Two heating schedules were simulated, each lasting 30 min: (1) hyperthermia at 43 °C (HT) and (2) hyperthermia followed by a high temperature (50 °C for 20 s) pulse (HT+). As preliminary model validation, in vivo studies were performed in thigh muscle of a New Zealand White rabbit, where local hyperthermia with a clinical magnetic resonance-guided HIFU system was applied following TSL administration. RESULTS: HT produced a defined region of high doxorubicin concentration (cellular concentration ∼15-23 µg/g) in the target region. Cellular drug uptake was directly related to HT duration, with increasing doxorubicin uptake up to ∼2 h. HT+ enhanced drug delivery by ∼40% compared to HT alone. Temperature difference between model and experiment within the hyperthermia zone was on average 0.54 °C. Doxorubicin concentration profile agreed qualitatively with in vivo fluorescence profile. CONCLUSIONS: Computational models can predict temperature and delivered drug from combination of HIFU with TSL. Drug delivery using TSL may be enhanced by prolonged hyperthermia up to 2 h or by local cessation of vascular perfusion with a high temperature pulse following hyperthermia.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a computational model that simulates (1) tissue heating with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and (2) resulting hyperthermia-mediated drug delivery from temperature-sensitive liposomes (TSL). MATERIALS AND METHODS:HIFU heating in tissue was simulated using a heat transfer model based on the bioheat equation, including heat-induced cessation of perfusion. A spatio-temporal multi-compartment pharmacokinetic model simulated intravascular release of doxorubicin from TSL, its transport into interstitium, and cell uptake. Two heating schedules were simulated, each lasting 30 min: (1) hyperthermia at 43 °C (HT) and (2) hyperthermia followed by a high temperature (50 °C for 20 s) pulse (HT+). As preliminary model validation, in vivo studies were performed in thigh muscle of a New Zealand White rabbit, where local hyperthermia with a clinical magnetic resonance-guided HIFU system was applied following TSL administration. RESULTS: HT produced a defined region of high doxorubicin concentration (cellular concentration ∼15-23 µg/g) in the target region. Cellular drug uptake was directly related to HT duration, with increasing doxorubicin uptake up to ∼2 h. HT+ enhanced drug delivery by ∼40% compared to HT alone. Temperature difference between model and experiment within the hyperthermia zone was on average 0.54 °C. Doxorubicin concentration profile agreed qualitatively with in vivo fluorescence profile. CONCLUSIONS: Computational models can predict temperature and delivered drug from combination of HIFU with TSL. Drug delivery using TSL may be enhanced by prolonged hyperthermia up to 2 h or by local cessation of vascular perfusion with a high temperature pulse following hyperthermia.
Authors: Charles Mougenot; Bruno Quesson; Baudouin Denis de Senneville; Philippe Lourenco de Oliveira; Sara Sprinkhuizen; Jean Palussière; Nicolas Grenier; Chrit T W Moonen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ayele H Negussie; Pavel S Yarmolenko; Ari Partanen; Ashish Ranjan; Genevieve Jacobs; David Woods; Henry Bryant; David Thomasson; Mark W Dewhirst; Bradford J Wood; Matthew R Dreher Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2011 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: J A Sparano; J Speyer; W J Gradishar; L Liebes; R Sridhara; S Mendoza; D Fry; M J Egorin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D M Brizel; B Klitzman; J M Cook; J Edwards; G Rosner; M W Dewhirst Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1993-01-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jessie L-S Au; Bertrand Z Yeung; Michael G Wientjes; Ze Lu; M Guillaume Wientjes Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Avinash Eranki; Navid Farr; Ari Partanen; Karun V Sharma; Christopher T Rossi; Avi Z Rosenberg; AeRang Kim; Matthew Oetgen; Haydar Celik; David Woods; Pavel S Yarmolenko; Peter C W Kim; Bradford J Wood Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Andrew S Mikhail; Ayele H Negussie; Cole Graham; Manoj Mathew; Bradford J Wood; Ari Partanen Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Andrew S Mikhail; Ari Partanen; Pavel Yarmolenko; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Bradford J Wood Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 2.266