| Literature DB >> 22621207 |
Chao Xu1, Xiaomei Yang, Wenhui Liu, Haitao Yuan, Chunxiao Yu, Ling Gao, Jiajun Zhao.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between TSH and the lipid profile is contradictory because few studies have excluded the potential influence of the thyroid hormones (TH). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between serum TSH levels and the lipid profile independent of TH.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22621207 PMCID: PMC3418165 DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-44
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
The characteristics of 568 CHD patients who were stratified according to serum TSH concentration
| Age (y) | 64.84(11.64) | 65.47(11.27) | 61.92(11.54) | 63.69(10.57) | 64.46(10.82) | 0.052 | 63.76(11.28) | |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 137.47(17.01) | 134.77(22.72) | 132.87(19.45) | 136.51(21.17) | 136.94(20.35) | 0.481 | 134.74(20.79) | |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 80.42(7.77) | 79.02(12.54) | 79.22(11.96) | 78.51(11.83) | 80.43(10.54) | 0.847 | 79.27(11.78) | |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 6.1328(1.24) | 5.4976(1.04) | 5.3802(1.30) | 5.0863(0.55) | 5.2059(0.83) | 0.001 | 5.3733(1.093) | |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.6163 (1.3305) | 4.8699(1.03) | 4.9598(1.15) | 4.9685(1.03) | 5.3518(1.34) | 0.013 | 4.9829(1.15) | |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.3226(0.69) | 1.3669(0.82) | 1.7644(1.62) | 1.6951(0.85) | 1.9766(1.66) | 0.003 | 1.6538(1.32) | |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 3.00(0.851) | 2.91(0.77) | 2.88(0.841) | 2.91 (0.74) | 3.16 (0.91) | 0.111 | 2.94(0.82) | |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.1506(0.29) | 1.2891(0.35) | 1.3229(0.37) | 1.2762(0.32) | 1.3557(0.29) | 0.141 | 1.3060(0.34) | |
| UA (μmol/L) | 297.9688 (107.94) | 313.9742(90.85) | 321.0955(101.73) | 311.7162(70.90) | 321.63(109.47) | 0.817 | 317.0161(95.98) | |
| TSH (mIU/L) | 0.1498(0.11) | 1.0532(0.34) | 2.1371(0.35) | 3.5424(0.56) | 19.760(33.33) | 0.000 | 4.6504(14.52) | |
| FT3 (pmol/L) | 8.1885(6.20) | 4.5007(0.79) | 4.5055(0.71) | 4.5020(0.83) | 3.5891(1.24) | 0.000 | 4.4864(1.58) | |
| FT4 (pmol/L) | 31.2682(17.85) | 17.5750(2.50) | 17.3971(2.84) | 16.7438(2.44) | 13.4475(4.76) | 0.000 | 17.2147(5.30) | |
| Smoking status | A | 17 | 121 | 159 | 72 | 80 | 0.0000 | |
| B | 0 | 23 | 26 | 3 | 5 | 0.0008 | | |
| C | 2 | 23 | 21 | 6 | 1 | 0.0009 | | |
| D | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0.2222 | ||
1. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The SD is shown in parentheses.
2. The groups were compared using a Chi-squared test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. 3. Abbreviations: SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, free plasma glucose; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and UA, uric acid. 4. The following reference ranges were based on our laboratory standards: Plasma glucose (3.9-6.1 mmol/L), total cholesterol (3.6-6.2 mmol/L), triglycerides (<1.71 mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (0–3.36 mmol/L), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (>1.15 mmol/L), TSH (0.27–4.2 mIU/L), FT3 (3.1-6.8 pmol/L), FT4 (12–22 pmol/L) and uric acid (142–339 μmol/L). 4. The smoking status categories are as follows: A, B, C and D represent no smoking, smoking 1–339, 440–1099, and above 1100 cigarettes per year, respectively. The data are presented as the number of people in each category.
The prevalence and distribution of thyroid dysfunction in CHD patients
| Male | 270 | 242 (89.63%) | 4 (1.48%) | 19 (7.04%) | 5 (1.85%) |
| Female | 298 | 220 (73.83%) | 15 (5.03%) | 38 (12.75%) | 25 (8.39%) |
| Total | 568 | 462 (81.34%) | 19 (3.34%) | 57 (10.04%) | 30 (5.28%) |
| <0.001 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.05 | ||
The data are presented as the number (percentage) of individuals in each category. The groups were compared using a Chi-squared test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Figure 1The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia in CHD patients who were stratified according to the serum TSH concentrations. The data are presented as the number (percentage) of individuals in each category. The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia showed a linear and significant increase with elevations of the serum TSH levels (Pearson’s Chi-squared test, linear trend 0.010, p < 0.05; Figure 1).
Correlation analysis of thyroid function and serum lipid parameters in total patients and euthyroidic patients
| total patients | LogTC | LogTG | LogLDL | LogHDL | |
| FT3 | Unadjusted | r = -0.125 | r = -0.010 | r = -0.053 | r = -0.132 |
| P = 0.003 | P = 0.810 | P = 0.212 | P = 0.002 | ||
| Adjusted* | r = -0.122 | r = -0.021 | r = -0.057 | r = -0.098 | |
| P = 0.007 | P = 0.646 | P = 0.210 | P = 0.030 | ||
| FT4 | Unadjusted | r = -0.190 | r = -0.046 | r = -0.084 | r = -0.184 |
| P = 0.000 | P = 0.269 | P = 0.047 | P = 0.000 | ||
| Adjusted* | r = -0.197 | r = -0.035 | r = -0.105 | r = -0.176 | |
| P = 0.000 | P = 0.442 | P = 0.021 | P = 0.000 | ||
| TSH | Unadjusted | r = 0.160 | r = 0.085 | r = 0.047 | r = 0.102 |
| P = 0.000 | P = 0.044 | P = 0.269 | P = 0.015 | ||
| Adjusted* | r = 0.146 | r = 0.051 | r = 0.074 | r = 0.069 | |
| P = 0.001 | P = 0.261 | P = 0.103 | P = 0.131 | ||
| Adjusted** | r = 0.095 | r = 0.044 | r = 0.048 | r = 0.020 | |
| P = 0.036 | P = 0.337 | P = 0.295 | P = 0.658 | ||
| euthyroidic patients | LogTC | LogTG | LogLDL | LogHDL | |
| FT3 | Unadjusted | r = -0.150 | r = -0.113 | r = -0.102 | r = 0.052 |
| P = 0.001 | P = 0.015 | P = 0.029 | P = 0.269 | ||
| Adjusted* | r = -0.190 | r = -0.072 | r = -0.141 | r = -0.031 | |
| P = 0.000 | P = 0.153 | P = 0.005 | P = 0.537 | ||
| FT4 | Unadjusted | r = -0.012 | r = -0.043 | r = -0.008 | r = 0.140 |
| P = 0.004 | P = 0.355 | P = 0.859 | P = 0.003 | ||
| Adjusted* | r = -0.011 | r = -0.057 | r = -0.020 | r = 0.120 | |
| P = 0.003 | P = 0.255 | P = 0.690 | P = 0.017 | ||
| TSH | Unadjusted | r = 0.055 | r = 0.199 | r = 0.003 | r = 0.002 |
| P = 0.040 | P = 0.000 | P = 0.955 | P = 0.974 | ||
| Adjusted* | r = 0.050 | r = 0.185 | r = 0.012 | r = -0.010 | |
| P = 0.018 | P = 0.001 | P = 0.815 | P = 0.847 | ||
| Adjusted** | r = 0.049 | r = 0.190 | r = 0.011 | r = -0.019 | |
| P = 0.027 | P = 0.007 | P = 0.821 | P = 0.707 | ||
TC, TG, LDL, and HDL were transformed to their natural logarithm to optimize the models. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
* Adjusted for sex, age, smoking status and FPG.
** Adjusted for sex, age, smoking status, FPG and thyroid hormones.
The response relationship between thyroid function and the serum TC level
| TSH | 0.015580712 | 89 | <0.001 |
| FT3 | -0.001921199 | 56 | <0.001 |
| FT4 | -0.011725050 | 97 | <0.001 |
The data are presented as the coefficients and significant frequencies. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.