| Literature DB >> 26158620 |
Cuixia Gao1, Tingting Li2, Jing Liu3, Qian Guo3, Limin Tian3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) and its associations with atherosclerosis (AS) and cardiovascular disease remain controversial. The purpose of our study was to observe changes in endothelial functioning and hemodynamics in rats with SCH and to determine whether L-thyroxine (L-T4) administration affects these changes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26158620 PMCID: PMC4497722 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1L-T4 treatment improved the body weights of SCH rats.
The data are expressed as the mean±standard error (SE). *P<0.05 vs. control group.
Fig 2No significant difference was observed in water consumption among the three groups.
The data are expressed as the mean±standard error (SE).
Serum thyroid hormone, TSH, lipids, ET and NO levels.
| C | SCH | SCH+T4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT3 (ng/ml) | 0.87±0.15 | 0.81±0.12 | 0.83±0.19 |
| TT4 (ng/ml) | 59.82±9.56 | 52.31±10.3 | 54.12±9.43 |
| TSH (μIU/ml) | 0.95±0.48 | 17.4±6.41 | 0.83±0.29 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 1.26±0.06 | 2.38±0.55 | 1.29±0.05 |
| LDL-C(mmol/l) | 0.40±0.08 | 1.02±0.32 | 0.42±0.04 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 0.43±0.09 | 0.44±0.08 | 0.42±0.05 |
| HDL-C(mmol/l) | 0.78±0.04 | 0.80±0.02 | 0.79±0.03 |
| ET (nmol/l) | 93.41±17.23 | 160.62±37.25 | 98.54±32.43 |
| NO (μmol/l) | 314.75±32.69 | 235.13±20.14 | 307.69±32.85 |
Data are expressed as the mean±standard error (SE).
*P<0.05 vs. control group;
#P<0.05 vs.
SCH group; NS, not significant. TT3: Total triiodothyronin; TT4:Total thyroxin; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone; TC: Total cholesterol; LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: Triglyceride; HDL: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; ET: endothelin; NO: nitric oxide.
Blood pressure.
| C | SCH | SCH+T4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tail blood pressure | SBP(mmHg) | 157±13 | 116±6 | 165±11 |
| MBP(mmHg) | 136±15 | 99±6 | 144±13 | |
| DBP(mmHg) | 126±17 | 91±7 | 134±15 | |
| Carotid artery blood pressure | SBP(mmHg) | 127±15 | 111±6 | 122±10 |
| MBP(mmHg) | 121±13 | 98±7 | 118±8 | |
| DBP(mmHg) | 108±13 | 86±8 | 101±8 |
Data are expressed as the mean±standard error (SE).
*P<0.05 vs. control group;
#P<0.05 vs.
SCH group; SBP: systolic blood pressure; MBP: mean blood pressure; DBP: diastole blood pressure.
Ventricular parameter.
| C | SCH | SCH+T4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LV Sys P(mmHg) | 121±12 | 108±12 | 123±5 |
| LVEDP (mmHg) | 13±10 | 5.8±5 | 18±7 |
| Mean Pressure (mmHg) | 63±10 | 51±9 | 65±4 |
| Heart Rate (BPM) | 403±28 | 347±35 | 397±51 |
| Min dP/dt (mmHg/s) | -7376±773 | -4672±670 | -6445±361 |
| Contractility Index (1/s) | 62±7 | 111±16 | 61±17 |
| Max dP/dt (mmHg/s) | 6507±831 | 4861±573 | 6849±342 |
| Tau(s) | 0.02±0.001 | 0.03±0.003 | 0.0184±0.004 |
Data are expressed as the mean±standard error (SE).
*P<0.05 vs. control group;
#P<0.05 vs.
SCH group; LV Sys P: left ventricular systolic pressure; LVEDP: left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; HR, heart rate; Min dP/dt: minimal rate of pressure decline. Max dP/dt: maximal rate of pressure rise; Tau, time constant of LV isovolumic relaxation; BMP, beats/min.
Fig 3Aorta ventralis blood flow was decreased in the SCH group and was improved by L-T4 treatment.
The data are expressed as the mean±standard error (SE). *P<0.05 vs. control group; #P<0.05 vs. SCH group.
Fig 4L-T4 treatment improved endothelium-dependent relaxation in SCH rats.
Endothelium-dependent relaxation in response to acetylcholine in rat abdominal aorta. Experiments were performed using control, SCH and SCH+T4 group rats. The data are presented as the mean±SE of 20 experiments. *P<0.05 vs. control group; #P<0.05 vs. SCH group.
Fig 5There is no significant pathological changes of the aortic arch in any of the three study groups.
Representative histological sections of the arcus aortae wall stained with H&E (200x). A: SCH group; B:SCH+T4 group; and C: control group.