Literature DB >> 22617504

Is it worth placing ventricular pacing wires in all patients post-coronary artery bypass grafting?

Maziar Khorsandi1, Ishaq Muhammad, Kasra Shaikhrezai, Renzo Pessotto.   

Abstract

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether ventricular pacing wires should be placed routinely in all patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) regardless of immediate post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) rhythm status. Using the reported search, 142 papers were found, from which 10 papers represented the best evidence on the subject. The author, date and country of 10 publications, study type, patient group studied, relevant outcomes and results are tabulated. Complete atrio-ventricular (AV) block is the main reason for inserting ventricular pacing wires upon conclusion of CABG. Eight studies found complete AV block to be a rare entity post-CABG. The rate of complete AV block in CABG in our review ranged from 0.3 to 24%. The calculated average rate of AV block in all studies was 2.4%. The number needed to treat with ventricular wires to support a patient who develops AV block is 42. One randomized controlled trial found 3% risk of complete AV block post-CABG. Another cohort of 222 patients revealed a rate of 1.8% for complete AV block. For one cohort of 770 patients, post-CABG the rate of complete AV block was found to be 0.3%. In one cohort of 25 patients, there was a rate of 4% for complete AV block post-CABG. Another study of 564 patients revealed a rate of 0.7% for complete AV block. A study of 4999 patients post-CABG reported a rate of 1.2% for complete AV block. In one cohort of 93 patients, there was a 4% risk of complete AV block. Another cohort of 62 patients showed a rate of 1.6% for complete AV block. Only two papers found the rate of complete AV block post-CABG to be as high as 24 and 16%. Both studies were limited by sample size. In conclusion, routine ventricular pacing wire insertion post-CABG is unnecessary given that routine use of ventricular wires can occasionally cause complications such as bleeding and cardiac tamponade and thus is not risk free. We also found that the incidence of complete AV block is probably higher in on-CPB CABG than off-CPB CABG and that AV pacing may be haemodynamically beneficial for some patients postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22617504      PMCID: PMC3422916          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  12 in total

1.  Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS.

Authors:  Joel Dunning; Brian Prendergast; Kevin Mackway-Jones
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-12

2.  Frequency and significance of complete atrioventricular block after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  J Caspi; R Amar; A Elami; T Safadi; G Merin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Placing epicardial pacing wires in isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery--a procedure routinely done but rarely beneficial.

Authors:  Muhammad Imran Asghar; Asif Ali Khan; Afsheen Iqbal; Attiya Arshad; Inamullah Afridi
Journal:  J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar

4.  Temporary left ventricular pacing improves haemodynamic performance in patients requiring epicardial pacing post cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Michael J Flynn; Janet M McComb; John Henry Dark
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Determining the utility of temporary pacing wires after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Brian T Bethea; Jorge D Salazar; Maura A Grega; John R Doty; Torin P Fitton; Diane E Alejo; Louis M Borowicz; Vincent L Gott; Marc S Sussman; William A Baumgartner
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Permanent pacemaker implantation following cardiac surgery: indications and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Ofer Merin; Michael Ilan; Avraham Oren; Daniel Fink; Maher Deeb; Dani Bitran; Shuli Silberman
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Is routine use of temporary epicardial pacing wires necessary after either OPCAB or conventional CABG/CPB?

Authors:  John D Puskas; Erez Sharoni; Willis H Williams; Rebecca Petersen; Peggy Duke; Robert A Guyton
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.676

8.  Impact of atrio-biventricular pacing to poor left-ventricular function after CABG.

Authors:  U Weisse; F Isgro; Ch Werling; A Lehmann; W Saggau
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Is use of temporary pacing wires following coronary bypass surgery really necessary?

Authors:  Y Imren; A A Benson; G L Oktar; F H Cheema; G Comas; T Naseem
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.888

10.  Natural history and determinants of conduction defects following coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  J M Baerman; M M Kirsh; M de Buitleir; L Hyatt; J E Juni; B Pitt; F Morady
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Is it safe to cut pacing wires flush with the skin instead of removing them?

Authors:  Kasra Shaikhrezai; Maziar Khorsandi; Marios Patronis; Sai Prasad
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-09-07

2.  Incomplete Removal and Accidental Retention of Temporary Epicardial Pacing Wires in the Chest after Heart Surgery: A Case Report.

Authors:  Ahmadali Khalili; Ahmadreza Jodati; Mehran Rahimi; Amir Faravn; Razieh Parizad
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2021-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.