Literature DB >> 15620924

Determining the utility of temporary pacing wires after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Brian T Bethea1, Jorge D Salazar, Maura A Grega, John R Doty, Torin P Fitton, Diane E Alejo, Louis M Borowicz, Vincent L Gott, Marc S Sussman, William A Baumgartner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Temporary epicardial pacing wires are used routinely after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and can cause rare, catastrophic complications. This study's purpose was to identify patient characteristics predicting the need for pacing after CABG surgery with the potential to limit their utilization.
METHODS: This prospective observational study involved 290 consecutive patients undergoing CABG at our institution from August 2000 to January 2001. Sixty-eight patients were excluded for the following reasons: off-pump CABG, preoperative pacemaker, no pacing wire placement, or incomplete follow-up. Among the remaining 222 patients, the incidence of pacing during the postoperative period was recorded. Univariate and independent multivariate predictors for postoperative pacing were determined using medical records, the Johns Hopkins Hospital cardiac surgery database and the Society of Thoracic Surgery database.
RESULTS: In the postoperative period, 19 of 222 patients (8.6%) required pacing. Univariate analysis identified age, cardiomegaly, preoperative antiarrhythmic therapy, diabetes mellitus, preoperative arrhythmia, inotropic agents leaving the operating room, and pacing initialized at the separation from cardiopulmonary bypass as predictors of the need for postoperative pacing. Only diabetes mellitus, preoperative arrhythmia, and pacing utilized to separate from bypass were found to be significant on multivariate analysis. Using this model, if we exclude the patients with any of these three risk factors, only 2.6% of them would have required pacing.
CONCLUSIONS: Few patients require temporary epicardial pacing after routine CABG. This study identified specific predictors for postoperative pacing requirements and provides criteria for the selective use of epicardial pacing wires after CABG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15620924     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Inside and out: an epicardial lead gone astray.

Authors:  Susie N Hong; Barry Rosenzweig; Gregory A Crooke; Itzhak Kronzon; Monvadi B Srichai
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Is it safe to cut pacing wires flush with the skin instead of removing them?

Authors:  Kasra Shaikhrezai; Maziar Khorsandi; Marios Patronis; Sai Prasad
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-09-07

Review 3.  Is it worth placing ventricular pacing wires in all patients post-coronary artery bypass grafting?

Authors:  Maziar Khorsandi; Ishaq Muhammad; Kasra Shaikhrezai; Renzo Pessotto
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-22

4.  Is there a correlation between late re-exploration after cardiac surgery and removal of epicardial pacemaker wires?

Authors:  Ioannis Bougioukas; Ahmad Fawad Jebran; Marius Grossmann; Martin Friedrich; Theodor Tirilomis; Friedrich A Schoendube; Bernhard Christoph Danner
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Predictors of temporary epicardial pacing wires use after valve surgery.

Authors:  Nizar R Alwaqfi; Khaled S Ibrahim; Yousef S Khader; Ahmad Abu Baker
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Clinical and mechanical factors associated with the removal of temporary epicardial pacemaker wires after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Elsayed Elmistekawy; Yen-Yen Gee; Dai Une; Matthieu Lemay; Anne Stolarik; Fraser D Rubens
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.