BACKGROUND: We have recently proposed to reclassify the pleomorphic subtype of epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) as nonepithelioid (biphasic/sarcomatoid) histology because of its similarly poor prognosis. We sought to investigate whether preoperative maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) correlates with histologic subtype in MPM. METHODS: Clinical data were collected for 78 patients with MPM who underwent preoperative FDG-PET. We retrospectively classified the epithelioid tumors into five subtypes: trabecular, tubulopapillary, micropapillary, solid, and pleomorphic. Tumors were categorized by SUVmax into two groups: low (<10.0) and high (≥10.0). RESULTS: The median overall survival of epithelioid tumors with high SUVmax (n = 12) was significantly shorter (7.1 months) than that of epithelioid tumors with low SUVmax (n = 54, 18.9 months, p < 0.001) and comparable to nonepithelioid tumors (n = 12, 7.2 months). Epithelioid tumors with pleomorphic subtype (n = 9) had marginally higher SUVmax (mean ± SD: 10.6 ± 5.9) than epithelioid nonpleomorphic subtype (n = 57, 6.5 ± 3.2, p = 0.050), and were comparable to that of nonepithelioid tumors (n = 12, 9.1 ± 4.8). Among the epithelioid tumors with high SUVmax (n = 12), 50% (n = 6) showed pleomorphic subtype. In contrast, among epithelioid tumors with low SUVmax (n = 54), 6% (n = 3) showed epithelioid pleomorphic subtypes (p = 0.001). A positive correlation between mitotic count and SUVmax was observed (r = 0.30, p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Pleomorphic subtype of epithelioid MPM showed higher SUVmax than the epithelioid nonpleomorphic subtype and was similar to nonepithelioid histology. Preoperative SUVmax on FDG-PET in epithelioid MPM can indicate patients with pleomorphic subtype with poor prognosis, supporting their reclassification as nonepithelioid.
BACKGROUND: We have recently proposed to reclassify the pleomorphic subtype of epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) as nonepithelioid (biphasic/sarcomatoid) histology because of its similarly poor prognosis. We sought to investigate whether preoperative maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) correlates with histologic subtype in MPM. METHODS: Clinical data were collected for 78 patients with MPM who underwent preoperative FDG-PET. We retrospectively classified the epithelioid tumors into five subtypes: trabecular, tubulopapillary, micropapillary, solid, and pleomorphic. Tumors were categorized by SUVmax into two groups: low (<10.0) and high (≥10.0). RESULTS: The median overall survival of epithelioid tumors with high SUVmax (n = 12) was significantly shorter (7.1 months) than that of epithelioid tumors with low SUVmax (n = 54, 18.9 months, p < 0.001) and comparable to nonepithelioid tumors (n = 12, 7.2 months). Epithelioid tumors with pleomorphic subtype (n = 9) had marginally higher SUVmax (mean ± SD: 10.6 ± 5.9) than epithelioid nonpleomorphic subtype (n = 57, 6.5 ± 3.2, p = 0.050), and were comparable to that of nonepithelioid tumors (n = 12, 9.1 ± 4.8). Among the epithelioid tumors with high SUVmax (n = 12), 50% (n = 6) showed pleomorphic subtype. In contrast, among epithelioid tumors with low SUVmax (n = 54), 6% (n = 3) showed epithelioid pleomorphic subtypes (p = 0.001). A positive correlation between mitotic count and SUVmax was observed (r = 0.30, p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Pleomorphic subtype of epithelioid MPM showed higher SUVmax than the epithelioid nonpleomorphic subtype and was similar to nonepithelioid histology. Preoperative SUVmax on FDG-PET in epithelioid MPM can indicate patients with pleomorphic subtype with poor prognosis, supporting their reclassification as nonepithelioid.
Authors: Raja M Flores; Timothy Akhurst; Mithat Gonen; Maureen Zakowski; Joseph Dycoco; Steven M Larson; Valerie W Rusch Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Hubert Vesselle; Alexander Salskov; Eric Turcotte; Linda Wiens; Rodney Schmidt; C Diana Jordan; Eric Vallières; Douglas E Wood Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Gaber Komar; Mika Teräs; Marko Seppänen; Jussi Hirvonen; Tero Vahlberg; Jörgen Bergman; Heikki Minn Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Kyuichi Kadota; Jonathan Villena-Vargas; Jun-Ichi Nitadori; Camelia S Sima; David R Jones; William D Travis; Prasad S Adusumilli Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: F Galateau Salle; N Le Stang; A G Nicholson; D Pissaloux; A Churg; S Klebe; V L Roggli; H D Tazelaar; J M Vignaud; R Attanoos; M B Beasley; H Begueret; F Capron; L Chirieac; M C Copin; S Dacic; C Danel; A Foulet-Roge; A Gibbs; S Giusiano-Courcambeck; K Hiroshima; V Hofman; A N Husain; K Kerr; A Marchevsky; K Nabeshima; J M Picquenot; I Rouquette; C Sagan; J L Sauter; F Thivolet; W D Travis; M S Tsao; B Weynand; F Damiola; A Scherpereel; J C Pairon; S Lantuejoul; V Rusch; N Girard Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Joanna G Escalon; Kate A Harrington; Andrew J Plodkowski; Junting Zheng; Marinela Capanu; Marjorie G Zauderer; Valerie W Rusch; Michelle S Ginsberg Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2018 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Paolo Andrea Zucali; Egesta Lopci; Giovanni Luca Ceresoli; Laura Giordano; Matteo Perrino; Gianluigi Ciocia; Letizia Gianoncelli; Elena Lorenzi; Matteo Simonelli; Fabio De Vincenzo; Lucia Rebecca Setti; Cristiana Bonifacio; Maria Bonomi; Emilio Bombardieri; Arturo Chiti; Armando Santoro Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 4.452