BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The heterotopic syngeneic tracheal transplant mouse model is an acute hypoxic-ischemic injury model that undergoes complete repair and regeneration. We hypothesized that the repair and regeneration process of the surface epithelium and submucosal glands would occur in a reproducible pattern that could be followed by the expression of specific markers of epithelial cell types. METHODS: We used the syngeneic heterotopic tracheal transplant model to develop a temporal and spatial map of cellular repair and regeneration by examining the tracheal grafts at post-transplant days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14. We used pulsed BrdU and immunofluorescent staining to identify and follow proliferating and repairing cell populations. RESULTS: We confirmed the reproducibility of the injury and repair in the model and we found a distinct sequence of reappearance of the various stem/progenitor and differentiated cell populations of the tracheal surface epithelium and submucosal glands. In the initial phase, the basal and duct cells that survived the injury proliferated to re-epithelialize the basement membrane with K5 and K14 expressing cells. Then these cells proliferated further and differentiated to restore the function of the epithelium. During this repair process, TROP-2 marked all repairing submucosal gland tubules and ducts. Non-CCSP-expressing serous cells were found to differentiate 4-5 days before Clara, mucus and ciliated cells. CONCLUSIONS: Improving our understanding of the reparative process of the airway epithelium will allow us to identify cell-specific mechanisms of repair that could be used as novel therapeutic approaches for abnormal repair leading to airway diseases.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The heterotopic syngeneic tracheal transplant mouse model is an acute hypoxic-ischemic injury model that undergoes complete repair and regeneration. We hypothesized that the repair and regeneration process of the surface epithelium and submucosal glands would occur in a reproducible pattern that could be followed by the expression of specific markers of epithelial cell types. METHODS: We used the syngeneic heterotopic tracheal transplant model to develop a temporal and spatial map of cellular repair and regeneration by examining the tracheal grafts at post-transplant days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14. We used pulsed BrdU and immunofluorescent staining to identify and follow proliferating and repairing cell populations. RESULTS: We confirmed the reproducibility of the injury and repair in the model and we found a distinct sequence of reappearance of the various stem/progenitor and differentiated cell populations of the tracheal surface epithelium and submucosal glands. In the initial phase, the basal and duct cells that survived the injury proliferated to re-epithelialize the basement membrane with K5 and K14 expressing cells. Then these cells proliferated further and differentiated to restore the function of the epithelium. During this repair process, TROP-2 marked all repairing submucosal gland tubules and ducts. Non-CCSP-expressing serous cells were found to differentiate 4-5 days before Clara, mucus and ciliated cells. CONCLUSIONS: Improving our understanding of the reparative process of the airway epithelium will allow us to identify cell-specific mechanisms of repair that could be used as novel therapeutic approaches for abnormal repair leading to airway diseases.
Authors: Ahmed E Hegab; Vi Luan Ha; Jennifer L Gilbert; Kelvin Xi Zhang; Stephen P Malkoski; Andy T Chon; Daphne O Darmawan; Bharti Bisht; Aik T Ooi; Matteo Pellegrini; Derek W Nickerson; Brigitte N Gomperts Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: John A Belperio; Michael P Keane; Marie D Burdick; Brigitte N Gomperts; Ying Ying Xue; Kurt Hong; Javier Mestas; David Zisman; Abbas Ardehali; Rajan Saggar; Joseph P Lynch; David J Ross; Robert M Strieter Journal: J Immunol Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: John A Belperio; Michael P Keane; Marie D Burdick; Brigitte Gomperts; Ying Ying Xue; Kurt Hong; Javier Mestas; Abbas Ardehali; Borna Mehrad; Rajan Saggar; Joseph P Lynch; David J Ross; Robert M Strieter Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Brigitte N Gomperts; John A Belperio; P Nagesh Rao; Scott H Randell; Michael C Fishbein; Marie D Burdick; Robert M Strieter Journal: J Immunol Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Andrew S Goldstein; Devon A Lawson; Donghui Cheng; Wenyi Sun; Isla P Garraway; Owen N Witte Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Xin Sun; Anne-Karina Perl; Rongbo Li; Sheila M Bell; Eniko Sajti; Vladimir V Kalinichenko; Tanya V Kalin; Ravi S Misra; Hitesh Deshmukh; Geremy Clair; Jennifer Kyle; Laura E Crotty Alexander; Jorge A Masso-Silva; Joseph A Kitzmiller; Kathryn A Wikenheiser-Brokamp; Gail Deutsch; Minzhe Guo; Yina Du; Michael P Morley; Michael J Valdez; Haoze V Yu; Kang Jin; Eric E Bardes; Jarod A Zepp; Terren Neithamer; Maria C Basil; William J Zacharias; Jamie Verheyden; Randee Young; Gautam Bandyopadhyay; Sara Lin; Charles Ansong; Joshua Adkins; Nathan Salomonis; Bruce J Aronow; Yan Xu; Gloria Pryhuber; Jeff Whitsett; Edward E Morrisey Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 13.417
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Preston J Anderson; Weiliang Xie; Adrianne K Crooke; Xiaoming Liu; Scott R Tyler; Meihui Luo; David M Kusner; Yulong Zhang; Traci Neff; Daniel C Burnette; Katherine S Walters; Michael J Goodheart; Kalpaj R Parekh; John F Engelhardt Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 6.277