Literature DB >> 22616042

Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.

Christian R Leutert1, Bogna Stawarczyk, Thomas C Truninger, Christoph H F Hämmerle, Irena Sailer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the bending moments and fracture patterns of different zirconia abutments with internal implant-abutment connections after static loading and to compare their bending moments to those of internally connected titanium abutments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three types of customized zirconia abutments (Straumann CARES abutments/Straumann BL implants [T1], Astra ZirDesign abutments/Astra Micro Thread OsseoSpeed implants [T2], Zirabut prototype abutments/Straumann SP implants [T3]) and one type of customized titanium abutment (control group, Straumann CARES abutments/Straumann BL implants [C]) were included. All abutments were one-piece abutments with an internal implant-abutment connection and were customized to the same shape but featured different implant-abutment connection designs. For each group, 20 identical copies of a master abutment were fabricated and fixed on their corresponding implants. Half of the abutments in each group were left unrestored, and the other 10 received glass-ceramic crowns. Static loading was applied at a 30-degree angle to the palatal surface until failure, and bending moments were calculated. The type of failure was characterized visually by dismounting the abutments and by examination of cross-sections of the embedded specimens. The results were analyzed statistically.
RESULTS: The mean range of bending moments was higher for the unrestored groups (158.2 to 678.2 Ncm) than for the restored groups (117.9 to 419.4 Ncm). The highest mean bending moments were seen in the control group, both restored and unrestored (419.4/678.2 Ncm). Unrestored, T1 and T2 exhibited significantly higher bending moments than T3. This was also observed in the restored groups.
CONCLUSION: Both the abutment material and the implant-abutment connection design affected the bending moments of abutments after static loading. Internally connected zirconia abutments with horizontal mismatch to the implant exhibited significantly higher bending moments compared to those without horizontal mismatch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22616042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

1.  Mechanical stability of angulated zirconia abutments supporting maxillary anterior single crowns on narrow-diameter implants.

Authors:  Ruiyang Ma; Ping Yu; Yuqiang Zhang; Chenyang Xie; Xin Tan; Jikui Sun; Haiyang Yu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Evaluation of stability of interface between CCM (Co-Cr-Mo) UCLA abutment and external hex implant.

Authors:  Ki-Joon Yoon; Young-Bum Park; Hyunmin Choi; Youngsung Cho; Jae-Hoon Lee; Keun-Woo Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.

Authors:  Hakimeh Siadat; Elaheh Beyabanaki; Niloufar Mousavi; Marzieh Alikhasi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Biocompatibility and antibacterial properties of zirconium nitride coating on titanium abutments: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Giulia Brunello; Paola Brun; Chiara Gardin; Letizia Ferroni; Eriberto Bressan; Roberto Meneghello; Barbara Zavan; Stefano Sivolella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mechanical Outcomes, Microleakage, and Marginal Accuracy at the Implant-Abutment Interface of Original versus Nonoriginal Implant Abutments: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Marco Tallarico; Joseph Fiorellini; Yasushi Nakajima; Yuki Omori; Iida Takahisa; Luigi Canullo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-12-30       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Influence of Implant Connection, Abutment Design and Screw Insertion Torque on Implant-Abutment Misfit.

Authors:  Jorge Vélez; Jesús Peláez; Carlos López-Suárez; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Celia Tobar; María J Suárez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Comparing the Fracture Resistance and Modes of Failure in Different Types of CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments with Internal Hexagonal Implants: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Yu-Tsen Chang; Yu-Ling Wu; Hung-Shyong Chen; Ming-Hsu Tsai; Chia-Chen Chang; Aaron Yu-Jen Wu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  The compressive strength of implant-abutment complex with different connection designs.

Authors:  Hsien-Ching Hung; Chiung-Shing Huang; Yu-Hwa Pan
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.080

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.