Literature DB >> 22615401

Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda.

Terry C Daniel1, Andreas Muhar, Arne Arnberger, Olivier Aznar, James W Boyd, Kai M A Chan, Robert Costanza, Thomas Elmqvist, Courtney G Flint, Paul H Gobster, Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, Rebecca Lave, Susanne Muhar, Marianne Penker, Robert G Ribe, Thomas Schauppenlehner, Thomas Sikor, Ihor Soloviy, Marja Spierenburg, Karolina Taczanowska, Jordan Tam, Andreas von der Dunk.   

Abstract

Cultural ecosystem services (ES) are consistently recognized but not yet adequately defined or integrated within the ES framework. A substantial body of models, methods, and data relevant to cultural services has been developed within the social and behavioral sciences before and outside of the ES approach. A selective review of work in landscape aesthetics, cultural heritage, outdoor recreation, and spiritual significance demonstrates opportunities for operationally defining cultural services in terms of socioecological models, consistent with the larger set of ES. Such models explicitly link ecological structures and functions with cultural values and benefits, facilitating communication between scientists and stakeholders and enabling economic, multicriterion, deliberative evaluation and other methods that can clarify tradeoffs and synergies involving cultural ES. Based on this approach, a common representation is offered that frames cultural services, along with all ES, by the relative contribution of relevant ecological structures and functions and by applicable social evaluation approaches. This perspective provides a foundation for merging ecological and social science epistemologies to define and integrate cultural services better within the broader ES framework.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22615401      PMCID: PMC3384142          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  Ecology. The value of nature and the nature of value.

Authors:  G C Daily; T Söderqvist; S Aniyar; K Arrow; P Dasgupta; P R Ehrlich; C Folke; A Jansson; B Jansson; N Kautsky; S Levin; J Lubchenco; K G Mäler; D Simpson; D Starrett; D Tilman; B Walker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Economic reasons for conserving wild nature.

Authors:  Andrew Balmford; Aaron Bruner; Philip Cooper; Robert Costanza; Stephen Farber; Rhys E Green; Martin Jenkins; Paul Jefferiss; Valma Jessamy; Joah Madden; Kat Munro; Norman Myers; Shahid Naeem; Jouni Paavola; Matthew Rayment; Sergio Rosendo; Joan Roughgarden; Kate Trumper; R Kerry Turner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region.

Authors:  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey; Peter Bebi; Ian D Bishop; Willy A Schmid
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Compensating aboriginal cultural losses: an alternative approach to assessing environmental damages.

Authors:  Robin Gregory; William Trousdale
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest: the effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood.

Authors:  Robert G Ribe
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 6.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services.

Authors:  Elena M Bennett; Garry D Peterson; Line J Gordon
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.

Authors:  Stephen R Carpenter; Harold A Mooney; John Agard; Doris Capistrano; Ruth S Defries; Sandra Díaz; Thomas Dietz; Anantha K Duraiappah; Alfred Oteng-Yeboah; Henrique Miguel Pereira; Charles Perrings; Walter V Reid; José Sarukhan; Robert J Scholes; Anne Whyte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments.

Authors:  Diana E Bowler; Lisette M Buyung-Ali; Teri M Knight; Andrew S Pullin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity.

Authors:  Richard A Fuller; Katherine N Irvine; Patrick Devine-Wright; Philip H Warren; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Valuing ecological systems and services.

Authors:  Robert Costanza; Ida Kubiszewski; David Ervin; Randy Bluffstone; James Boyd; Darrell Brown; Heejun Chang; Veronica Dujon; Elise Granek; Stephen Polasky; Vivek Shandas; Alan Yeakley
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2011-07-01
  10 in total
  76 in total

1.  Perceptions of the Environment and Health Among Members of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation.

Authors:  Marc B Schure; Molly L Kile; Anna Harding; Barbara Harper; Stuart Harris; Sandra Uesugi; R Turner Goins
Journal:  Environ Justice       Date:  2013-06-01

2.  Pivotal cultural values of nature cannot be integrated into the ecosystem services framework.

Authors:  Thomas Kirchhoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services.

Authors:  María R Felipe-Lucia; Francisco A Comín; Javier Escalera-Reyes
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Species richness alone does not predict cultural ecosystem service value.

Authors:  Rose A Graves; Scott M Pearson; Monica G Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts.

Authors:  Denise Margaret S Matias; Julia Leventon; Anna-Lena Rau; Christian Borgemeister; Henrik von Wehrden
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  Continental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data.

Authors:  Boris T van Zanten; Derek B Van Berkel; Ross K Meentemeyer; Jordan W Smith; Koen F Tieskens; Peter H Verburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effects of bird community dynamics on the seasonal distribution of cultural ecosystem services.

Authors:  Rose A Graves; Scott M Pearson; Monica G Turner
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 8.  Integrating the aesthetic value of landscapes and biological diversity.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Tribot; Julie Deter; Nicolas Mouquet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The challenges of incorporating cultural ecosystem services into environmental assessment.

Authors:  Debra Satz; Rachelle K Gould; Kai M A Chan; Anne Guerry; Bryan Norton; Terre Satterfield; Benjamin S Halpern; Jordan Levine; Ulalia Woodside; Neil Hannahs; Xavier Basurto; Sarah Klain
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 5.129

10.  Motivations for recreating on farmlands, private forests, and state or national parks.

Authors:  Sandra Sotomayor; Carla Barbieri; Sonja Wilhelm Stanis; Francisco X Aguilar; Jordan W Smith
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.