Literature DB >> 22615392

Molecular signaling network complexity is correlated with cancer patient survivability.

Dylan Breitkreutz1, Lynn Hlatky, Edward Rietman, Jack A Tuszynski.   

Abstract

The 5-y survival for cancer patients after diagnosis and treatment is strongly dependent on tumor type. Prostate cancer patients have a >99% chance of survival past 5 y after diagnosis, and pancreatic patients have <6% chance of survival past 5 y. Because each cancer type has its own molecular signaling network, we asked if there are "signatures" embedded in these networks that inform us as to the 5-y survival. In other words, are there statistical metrics of the network that correlate with survival? Furthermore, if there are, can such signatures provide clues to selecting new therapeutic targets? From the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Cancer Pathway database we computed several conventional and some less conventional network statistics. In particular we found a correlation (R(2) = 0.7) between degree-entropy and 5-y survival based on the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. This correlation suggests that cancers that have a more complex molecular pathway are more refractory than those with less complex molecular pathway. We also found potential new molecular targets for drugs by computing the betweenness--a statistical metric of the centrality of a node--for the molecular networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22615392      PMCID: PMC3384193          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1201416109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Pathway databases.

Authors:  Carl F Schaefer
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Nuclear beta-catenin in basal cell carcinoma correlates with increased proliferation.

Authors:  G Saldanha; V Ghura; L Potter; A Fletcher
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Drug-target network.

Authors:  Muhammed A Yildirim; Kwang-Il Goh; Michael E Cusick; Albert-László Barabási; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Survival from cancer--up-to-date predictions using period analysis.

Authors:  Lany F Ellison; Laurie Gibbons
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.796

6.  Modeling cancer progression via pathway dependencies.

Authors:  Elena J Edelman; Justin Guinney; Jen-Tsan Chi; Phillip G Febbo; Sayan Mukherjee
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG.

Authors:  Minoru Kanehisa; Susumu Goto; Masahiro Hattori; Kiyoko F Aoki-Kinoshita; Masumi Itoh; Shuichi Kawashima; Toshiaki Katayama; Michihiro Araki; Mika Hirakawa
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  KEGGgraph: a graph approach to KEGG PATHWAY in R and bioconductor.

Authors:  Jitao David Zhang; Stefan Wiemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  A global view of drug-therapy interactions.

Authors:  Jose C Nacher; Jean-Marc Schwartz
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-04
View more
  39 in total

1.  Complex behaviours--new targets against cancer.

Authors:  Dali Tong; Jun Jiang
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: a novel paradigm of drug discovery: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Peter Csermely; Tamás Korcsmáros; Huba J M Kiss; Gábor London; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 3.  Toward precision medicine of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas Carels; Lizânia Borges Spinassé; Tatiana Martins Tilli; Jack Adam Tuszynski
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.432

4.  Gibbs free energy of protein-protein interactions correlates with ATP production in cancer cells.

Authors:  Stefan M Golas; Amber N Nguyen; Edward A Rietman; Jack A Tuszynski
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 1.365

5.  Thermodynamic measures of cancer: Gibbs free energy and entropy of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Edward A Rietman; John Platig; Jack A Tuszynski; Giannoula Lakka Klement
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 1.365

6.  The clinical utility of microRNA-21 as novel biomarker for diagnosing human cancers.

Authors:  Lijun Shen; Zhihong Wan; Yuming Ma; Libing Wu; Fangfang Liu; Hong Zang; Shaojie Xin
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-11-28

7.  Hierarchical closeness-based properties reveal cancer survivability and biomarker genes in molecular signaling networks.

Authors:  Tien-Dzung Tran; Yung-Keun Kwon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Beyond modules and hubs: the potential of gene coexpression networks for investigating molecular mechanisms of complex brain disorders.

Authors:  C Gaiteri; Y Ding; B French; G C Tseng; E Sibille
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.449

9.  Variability of Betweenness Centrality and Its Effect on Identifying Essential Genes.

Authors:  Christina Durón; Yuan Pan; David H Gutmann; Johanna Hardin; Ami Radunskaya
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Complexity of molecular alterations impacts pancreatic cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Ivonne Regel; Bo Kong; Philipp Bruns; Christoph W Michalski; Jörg Kleeff
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.