OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples from patients who underwent bronchoscopy for a clinical suspicion of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), to categorize patients as VAP positive and VAP negative, when compared to quantitative culture results of BALF. METHODS: Observational study conducted on admitted patients in the trauma-surgical, medical-cardiac, burn, and neurosurgical ICUs of Harborview Medical Center between March 2009 and May 2010. BALF and EBC samples were obtained from 45 patients with clinically suspected VAP. Bronchoscopy was performed on the day of clinically suspected VAP. sTREM-1 levels in EBC and BAL fluid were measured using quantikine human TREM-1 immunoassay. VAP was diagnosed by quantitative cultures of BALF. RESULTS: The concentrations of sTREM-1 in BALF and EBC did not correlate with VAP status. sTREM-1 levels did not discriminate VAP positive from VAP negative patients, when compared to quantitative cultures of BALF as the gold standard. Using a cutoff value of 204 pg/mL for BALF sTREM-1 levels resulted in a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 23%. A cutoff value of 10 pg/mL for EBC sTREM-1 levels resulted in a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 50%. CONCLUSIONS: EBC and BALF sTREM-1 levels did not effectively categorize patients as VAP positive or VAP negative when using direct bronchoscopic quantitative culture samples as the comparison standard.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples from patients who underwent bronchoscopy for a clinical suspicion of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), to categorize patients as VAP positive and VAP negative, when compared to quantitative culture results of BALF. METHODS: Observational study conducted on admitted patients in the trauma-surgical, medical-cardiac, burn, and neurosurgical ICUs of Harborview Medical Center between March 2009 and May 2010. BALF and EBC samples were obtained from 45 patients with clinically suspected VAP. Bronchoscopy was performed on the day of clinically suspected VAP. sTREM-1 levels in EBC and BAL fluid were measured using quantikine humanTREM-1 immunoassay. VAP was diagnosed by quantitative cultures of BALF. RESULTS: The concentrations of sTREM-1 in BALF and EBC did not correlate with VAP status. sTREM-1 levels did not discriminate VAP positive from VAP negative patients, when compared to quantitative cultures of BALF as the gold standard. Using a cutoff value of 204 pg/mL for BALF sTREM-1 levels resulted in a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 23%. A cutoff value of 10 pg/mL for EBC sTREM-1 levels resulted in a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 50%. CONCLUSIONS:EBC and BALF sTREM-1 levels did not effectively categorize patients as VAP positive or VAP negative when using direct bronchoscopic quantitative culture samples as the comparison standard.
Authors: Richard M Effros; Julie Biller; Bradley Foss; Kelly Hoagland; Marshall B Dunning; Daniel Castillo; Mark Bosbous; Feng Sun; Reza Shaker Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-09-25 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Muriel Fartoukh; Bernard Maitre; Stephanie Honoré; Charles Cerf; Jean-Ralph Zahar; Christian Brun-Buisson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-05-08 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: K P Steinberg; J A Milberg; T R Martin; R J Maunder; B A Cockrill; L D Hudson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1994-07 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Guy J Oudhuis; Judith Beuving; Dennis Bergmans; Ellen E Stobberingh; Guul ten Velde; Catharina F Linssen; Annelies Verbon Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-04-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jin Won Huh; Chae-Man Lim; Younsuck Koh; Yeon Mok Oh; Tae Sun Shim; Sang Do Lee; Woo Sung Kim; Dong Soon Kim; Won Dong Kim; Sang-Bum Hong Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-01-19 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Andre C Kalil; Mark L Metersky; Michael Klompas; John Muscedere; Daniel A Sweeney; Lucy B Palmer; Lena M Napolitano; Naomi P O'Grady; John G Bartlett; Jordi Carratalà; Ali A El Solh; Santiago Ewig; Paul D Fey; Thomas M File; Marcos I Restrepo; Jason A Roberts; Grant W Waterer; Peggy Cruse; Shandra L Knight; Jan L Brozek Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Tommaso Mauri; Andrea Coppadoro; Michela Bombino; Giacomo Bellani; Vanessa Zambelli; Carla Fornari; Lorenzo Berra; Edward A Bittner; Ulrich Schmidt; Marina Sironi; Barbara Bottazzi; Paolo Brambilla; Alberto Mantovani; Antonio Pesenti Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Susanna Esposito; Maria Di Gangi; Fabio Cardinale; Eugenio Baraldi; Ilaria Corsini; Liviana Da Dalt; Pier Angelo Tovo; Antonio Correra; Alberto Villani; Oliviero Sacco; Laura Tenero; Piera Dones; Monia Gambino; Alberto Zampiero; Nicola Principi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jia-Xin Shi; Jia-Shu Li; Rong Hu; Chun-Hua Li; Yan Wen; Hong Zheng; Feng Zhang; Qin Li Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 3.240