Literature DB >> 22612298

Iridocorneal angle measurements in mammalian species: normative data by optical coherence tomography.

Alexandra Almazan1, Susan Tsai, Paul E Miller, Susan S Lee, Abhiram S Vilupuru, James A Burke, Michael R Robinson.   

Abstract

Objective  Gonioscopy provides limited quantitative information to compare the iridocorneal anatomy across different species. In addition, the anatomic relationships by histologic examination are altered during processing. As a result, the comparative anatomy of the iridocorneal angle across several mammalian species was evaluated by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Methods  Cats, beagle dogs, minipigs, owl monkeys, cynomolgus monkeys, and rhesus monkeys (n = 6 or 7 per species) were evaluated. Imaging was performed using the OCT. The anterior chamber angle (ACA), angle opening distance (AOD), and the angle recess area (ARA) were evaluated. Results  AC angle: cat (63 ± 6°) > owl monkey (54 ± 4°) > beagle dog (42 ± 4°) > minipig (40 ± 3°) > rhesus monkey (36 ± 1°) > cynomolgus monkey (34 ± 2°). AOD: cat (3.3 ± 0.5 mm) > owl monkey (2.05 ± 0.2 mm) > beagle dog (1.08 ± 0.1 mm) > rhesus monkey (0.92 ± 0.06 mm) > minipig (0.64 ± 0.04 mm) > cynomolgus monkey (0.43 ± 0.03 mm). ARA: cat (3.5 ± 0.1 mm(2) ) > owl monkey (1.41 ± 0.2 mm(2) ) > dog (0.88 ± 0.1 mm(2) ) > rhesus monkey (0.62 ± 0.06 mm(2) ) > minipig (0.21 ± 0.05 mm(2) ) > cynomolgus monkey (0.15 ± 0.01 mm(2) ). Conclusions  This study benchmarks the normative iridocorneal angle measurements across different mammalian species by OCT. These data can be useful to compare iridocorneal angle measurements in disease states as OCT evolves as a common diagnostic tool in veterinary ophthalmic research and practice.
© 2012 Allergen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22612298     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2012.01030.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1463-5216            Impact factor:   1.644


  6 in total

1.  Toxicology Evaluation of Drugs Administered via Uncommon Routes: Intranasal, Intraocular, Intrathecal/Intraspinal, and Intra-Articular.

Authors:  Armaghan Emami; Jeff Tepper; Brian Short; Tony L Yaksh; Alison M Bendele; Thulasi Ramani; Alvaro F Cisternas; Jay H Chang; R Daniel Mellon
Journal:  Int J Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.032

2.  In vivo evaluation of the cornea and conjunctiva of the normal laboratory beagle using time- and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Ann R Strom; Dennis E Cortés; Carol A Rasmussen; Sara M Thomasy; Kim McIntyre; Shwu-Fei Lee; Philip H Kass; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 1.644

Review 3.  Looking into the future: Gene and cell therapies for glaucoma.

Authors:  András M Komáromy; Kristin L Koehl; Shin Ae Park
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 1.644

4.  Development and validation of methods to visualize conventional aqueous outflow pathways in canine primary angle closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Mary Rebecca Telle; Kevin C Snyder; Kazuya Oikawa; Jacob P Nilles; Shaile Gehrke; Leandro B C Teixeira; Julie A Kiland; Alex Huang; Gillian J McLellan
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 5.  The future of canine glaucoma therapy.

Authors:  András M Komáromy; Dineli Bras; Douglas W Esson; Ronald L Fellman; Sinisa D Grozdanic; Larry Kagemann; Paul E Miller; Sayoko E Moroi; Caryn E Plummer; John S Sapienza; Eric S Storey; Leandro B Teixeira; Carol B Toris; Terah R Webb
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 1.644

6.  Application of an organotypic ocular perfusion model to assess intravitreal drug distribution in human and animal eyes.

Authors:  D Chan; G J Won; A T Read; C R Ethier; E Thackaberry; S R Crowell; H Booler; V Bantseev; J M Sivak
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.118

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.