Literature DB >> 22612280

Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: the role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction.

Gethin Hughes1, Andrea Desantis, Florian Waszak.   

Abstract

Sensory processing of action effects has been shown to differ from that of externally triggered stimuli, with respect both to the perceived timing of their occurrence (intentional binding) and to their intensity (sensory attenuation). These phenomena are normally attributed to forward action models, such that when action prediction is consistent with changes in our environment, our experience of these effects is altered. Although much progress has been made in recent years in understanding sensory attenuation and intentional binding, a number of important questions regarding the precise nature of the predictive mechanisms involved remain unanswered. Moreover, these mechanisms are often not discussed in empirical papers, and a comprehensive review of these issues is yet to appear. This review attempts to fill this void. We systematically investigated the role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction in previous published reports of sensory attenuation and intentional binding. By isolating the individual processes that have previously been contrasted and incorporating these experiments with research in the related fields of temporal attention and stimulus expectation, we assessed the degree to which existing data provide evidence for the role of forward action models in these phenomena. We further propose a number of avenues for future research, which may help to better determine the role of motor prediction in processing of voluntary action effects, as well as to improve understanding of how these phenomena might fit within a general predictive processing framework. Furthermore, our analysis has important implications for understanding disorders of agency in schizophrenia. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22612280     DOI: 10.1037/a0028566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  83 in total

1.  Visuospatial cueing by self-caused features: Orienting of attention and action-outcome associative learning.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Hira Aslam; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Temporal and spatial constraints of action effect on sensory binding.

Authors:  Xavier Corveleyn; Joan Lopez-Moliner; Yann Coello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Somatosensory experiences with action modulate alpha and beta power during subsequent action observation.

Authors:  Lorna C Quandt; Peter J Marshall; Cedric A Bouquet; Thomas F Shipley
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Anticipation of delayed action-effects: learning when an effect occurs, without knowing what this effect will be.

Authors:  David Dignath; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-14

6.  Agency alters perceptual decisions about action-outcomes.

Authors:  Andrea Desantis; Florian Waszak; Andrei Gorea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perceived loudness of self-generated sounds is differentially modified by expected sound intensity.

Authors:  Daniel Reznik; Yael Henkin; Osnat Levy; Roy Mukamel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Mark T Wallace; Ryan A Stevenson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Voluntary action and tactile sensory feedback in the intentional binding effect.

Authors:  Ke Zhao; Li Hu; Fangbing Qu; Qian Cui; Qiuhong Piao; Hui Xu; Yanyan Li; Liang Wang; Xiaolan Fu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Hemispheric differences in the processing of visual consequences of active vs. passive movements: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Authors:  Benjamin Straube; Rasmus Schülke; Knut Drewing; Tilo Kircher; Bianca M van Kemenade
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.