Literature DB >> 28762054

Hemispheric differences in the processing of visual consequences of active vs. passive movements: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Benjamin Straube1, Rasmus Schülke2, Knut Drewing3, Tilo Kircher2, Bianca M van Kemenade2.   

Abstract

Perceiving the sensory consequences of one's own actions is essential to successfully interact with the environment. Previous studies compared self- (active) and externally generated (passive) movements to investigate the processing of voluntary action-outcomes. Increased temporal binding (intentional binding) as well as increased detection of delays between action and outcome have been observed for active compared to passive movements. Using transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) it has been shown that left hemispheric anodal stimulation decreased the intentional binding effect. However, whether the left hemisphere contributes to delay detection performance between action and outcome is unknown. We investigated polarization-dependent effects of left and right frontoparietal tDCS on detecting temporal action-outcome discrepancies. We applied anodal and cathodal stimulation to frontal (F3/F4), parietal (CP3/CP4) and frontoparietal (F3/CP4) areas. After stimulation, participants were presented with visual feedback with various delays after a key press. They had to report whether they detected a delay between the key press and the feedback. In half of the trials the key press was self-initiated, in the other half it was externally generated. A main effect of electrode location indicated highest detection performance after frontal stimulation. Furthermore, we found that the advantage for active versus passive conditions was larger for left hemispheric anodal stimulation as compared to cathodal stimulation. Whereas the frontal cortex is related to delay detection performance in general, hemispheric differences seem to support the differentiation of self-initiated versus externally generated movement consequences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action feedback; Action perception; Delay detection; Hemispheric lateralization; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28762054     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5053-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  48 in total

1.  The cerebellum contributes to somatosensory cortical activity during self-produced tactile stimulation.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert; C D Frith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert; C D Frith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; C D Frith; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  The spatial constraint in intersensory pairing: no role in temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Jean Vroomen; Mirjam Keetels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations.

Authors:  Chlöé Farrer; Scott H Frey; John D Van Horn; Eugene Tunik; David Turk; Souheil Inati; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Colleen A Dockery; Ruth Hueckel-Weng; Niels Birbaumer; Christian Plewnia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Mark T Wallace; Ryan A Stevenson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Dysconnectivity of the inferior frontal gyrus: implications for an impaired self-other distinction in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Bianca Backasch; Jens Sommer; Farahnaz Klöhn-Saghatolislam; Matthias J Müller; Tilo T J Kircher; Dirk T Leube
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  The neural basis of disturbed efference copy mechanism in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Dirk T Leube; Günther Knoblich; Michael Erb; Peter Schlotterbeck; Tilo T J Kircher
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.065

10.  Right but not left angular gyrus modulates the metric component of the mental body representation: a tDCS study.

Authors:  Grazia Fernanda Spitoni; Giorgio Pireddu; Rocco Luca Cimmino; Gaspare Galati; Alberto Priori; Michal Lavidor; Liron Jacobson; Luigi Pizzamiglio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Stochastic resonance improves visuomotor temporal integration in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Satoshi Nobusako; Michihiro Osumi; Atsushi Matsuo; Takahiro Fukuchi; Akio Nakai; Takuro Zama; Sotaro Shimada; Shu Morioka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Distortion of Visuo-Motor Temporal Integration in Apraxia: Evidence From Delayed Visual Feedback Detection Tasks and Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping.

Authors:  Satoshi Nobusako; Rintaro Ishibashi; Yusaku Takamura; Emika Oda; Yukie Tanigashira; Masashi Kouno; Takanori Tominaga; Yurie Ishibashi; Hiroyuki Okuno; Kaori Nobusako; Takuro Zama; Michihiro Osumi; Sotaro Shimada; Shu Morioka
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  The relationship and difference between delay detection ability and judgment of sense of agency.

Authors:  Michihiro Osumi; Satoshi Nobusako; Takuro Zama; Naho Yokotani; Sotaro Shimada; Takaki Maeda; Shu Morioka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The impact of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on sensorimotor and inter-sensory temporal recalibration.

Authors:  Christina V Schmitter; Benjamin Straube
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 5.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Symptomatology, and Cognition in Psychosis: A Qualitative Review.

Authors:  Tina Gupta; Nicholas J Kelley; Andrea Pelletier-Baldelli; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.