Literature DB >> 22611331

Detection of Propensity for Aggression based on Facial Structure Irrespective of Face Race.

Lindsey A Short1, Catherine J Mondloch, Cheryl M McCormick, Justin M Carré, Ruqian Ma, Genyue Fu, Kang Lee.   

Abstract

The human face provides a wealth of information pertaining to the internal state and life-stage history of an individual. Facial width-to-height ratio is a size-independent sexually dimorphic trait, and estimates of aggression made by untrained adults judging own-race faces were positively associated with both facial width-to-height ratio and actual aggressive behavior. Given the significant adaptive value of accurately detecting aggressiveness based on facial appearance, we hypothesized that aggression estimates made by adults and 8-year-olds would be highly correlated with male facial width-to-height ratio even for a face category with which they had minimal experience-other-race faces. For each of the four race and age groups, estimates of aggression were positively correlated with facial width-to-height ratio irrespective of rating own-or other-race faces. Overall, the correlations between facial width-to-height ratio and ratings of aggression were stronger for adults than for children. Sensitivity to facial width-to-height ratio appears to be part of an evolved mechanism designed to detect threats in the external environment. This mechanism is likely broadly tuned and functions independently of experience.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22611331      PMCID: PMC3352668          DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Hum Behav        ISSN: 1090-5138            Impact factor:   4.178


  27 in total

1.  Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces.

Authors:  J S Winston; B A Strange; J O'Doherty; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Processes underlying the cross-race effect: an investigation of holistic, featural, and relational processing of own-race versus other-race faces.

Authors:  Catherine J Mondloch; Natalie Elms; Daphne Maurer; Gillian Rhodes; William G Hayward; James W Tanaka; Guomei Zhou
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Developmental changes in perceptions of attractiveness: a role of experience?

Authors:  Philip A Cooper; Sybil S Geldart; Catherine J Mondloch; Daphne Maurer
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2006-09

4.  The role of the amygdala in implicit evaluation of emotionally neutral faces.

Authors:  Alexander Todorov; Andrew D Engell
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Very first impressions.

Authors:  Moshe Bar; Maital Neta; Heather Linz
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-05

6.  Effect of low-dose testosterone treatment on craniofacial growth in boys with delayed puberty.

Authors:  A Verdonck; M Gaethofs; C Carels; F de Zegher
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  They all look the same to me (unless they're angry): from out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity.

Authors:  Joshua M Ackerman; Jenessa R Shapiro; Steven L Neuberg; Douglas T Kenrick; D Vaughn Becker; Vladas Griskevicius; Jon K Maner; Mark Schaller
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-10

8.  Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces.

Authors:  Christopher P Said; Nicu Sebe; Alexander Todorov
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-04

9.  Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior.

Authors:  Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick; Catherine J Mondloch
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-08-14

10.  Biometric evidence that sexual selection has shaped the hominin face.

Authors:  Eleanor M Weston; Adrian E Friday; Pietro Liò
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Similarities and differences in Chinese and Caucasian adults' use of facial cues for trustworthiness judgments.

Authors:  Fen Xu; Dingcheng Wu; Rie Toriyama; Fengling Ma; Shoji Itakura; Kang Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Facing aggression: cues differ for female versus male faces.

Authors:  Shawn N Geniole; Amanda E Keyes; Catherine J Mondloch; Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Group Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Predicts Intergroup Negotiation Outcomes.

Authors:  Yu Yang; Chen Tang; Xiaofei Qu; Chao Wang; Thomas F Denson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-21

4.  Cross-Cultural Evidence for Apparent Racial Outgroup Advantage: Congruence between Perceived Facial Aggressiveness and Fighting Success.

Authors:  Vít Třebický; S Adil Saribay; Karel Kleisner; Robert Mbe Akoko; Tomáš Kočnar; Jaroslava Varella Valentova; Marco Antonio Correa Varella; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Children's Facial Trustworthiness Judgments: Agreement and Relationship with Facial Attractiveness.

Authors:  Fengling Ma; Fen Xu; Xianming Luo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-12

6.  Facial Width-To-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Katherine N Hanson Sobraske; Theodore Samore; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.