Literature DB >> 18424181

Variability of BOLD response evoked by foot vibrotactile stimulation: influence of vibration amplitude and stimulus waveform.

C M Siedentopf1, K Heubach, A Ischebeck, E Gallasch, M Fend, F M Mottaghy, F Koppelstaetter, I A Haala, B J Krause, S Felber, F Gerstenbrand, S M Golaszewski.   

Abstract

The aim of the present was study to evaluate cortical and subcortical neural responses on vibrotactile stimulation of the food and to assess somatosensory evoked BOLD responses in dependence of vibration amplitude and stimulus waveform. Sixteen healthy male subjects received vibrotactile stimulation at the sole of the right foot. The vibration stimulus was delivered through a moving magnet actuator system (MMAS). In an event-related design, a series of vibration stimuli with a duration of 1 s and a variable interstimulus interval was presented. Four stimulation conditions were realized using a 2 (amplitudes 0.4 mm or 1.6 mm) x 2 (waveform sinusoidal or amplitude modulated) factorial design. Stimulating with 0.4 mm amplitude compared to 1.6 mm stimulus amplitude more strongly activated the pre- and postcentral gyrus bilaterally and the right inferior, medial and middle frontal gyrus. In the reverse comparison significant differences were observed within the left inferior parietal lobule, the left superior temporal gyrus, and the left temporal transverse gyrus. In the comparison of sinusoidal versus modulated waveform and vice versa no significant activation differences were obtained. The inter-subject variability was high but when all four stimulation conditions were jointly analyzed, a significant activation of S1 was obtained for every single subject. This study demonstrated that the BOLD response is modulated by the amplitude but not by the waveform of vibrotactile stimulation. Despite high inter-individual variability, the stimulation yielded reliable results for S1 on the single-subject level. Therefore, our results suggest that vibrotactile testing could evolve into a clinical tool in functional neuroimaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18424181     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  5 in total

1.  Mechanical flutter stimulation induces a lasting response in the sensorimotor cortex as revealed with BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  Monica Christova; Stefan Golaszewski; Anja Ischebeck; Alexander Kunz; Dietmar Rafolt; Raffaele Nardone; Eugen Gallasch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Novel MRI-compatible tactile stimulator for cortical mapping of foot sole pressure stimuli with fMRI.

Authors:  Ying Hao; Brad Manor; Jing Liu; Kai Zhang; Yufeng Chai; Lewis Lipsitz; Chung-Kang Peng; Vera Novak; Xiaoying Wang; Jue Zhang; Jing Fang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Automated classification of fMRI data employing trial-based imagery tasks.

Authors:  Jong-Hwan Lee; Matthew Marzelli; Ferenc A Jolesz; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Visual conflict and cognitive load modify postural responses to vibrotactile noise.

Authors:  Emily A Keshner; Jill C Slaboda; Lois Lanaria Day; Kurosh Darvish
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Effects of Focal Vibration over Upper Limb Muscles on the Activation of Sensorimotor Cortex Network: An EEG Study.

Authors:  Wei Li; Chong Li; Quan Xu; Linhong Ji
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.682

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.