Literature DB >> 22610525

U-statistics in genetic association studies.

Hongzhe Li1.   

Abstract

Many common human diseases are complex and are expected to be highly heterogeneous, with multiple causative loci and multiple rare and common variants at some of the causative loci contributing to the risk of these diseases. Data from the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and metadata such as known gene functions and pathways provide the possibility of identifying genetic variants, genes and pathways that are associated with complex phenotypes. Single-marker-based tests have been very successful in identifying thousands of genetic variants for hundreds of complex phenotypes. However, these variants only explain very small percentages of the heritabilities. To account for the locus- and allelic-heterogeneity, gene-based and pathway-based tests can be very useful in the next stage of the analysis of GWAS data. U-statistics, which summarize the genomic similarity between pair of individuals and link the genomic similarity to phenotype similarity, have proved to be very useful for testing the associations between a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms and the phenotypes. Compared to single marker analysis, the advantages afforded by the U-statistics-based methods is large when the number of markers involved is large. We review several formulations of U-statistics in genetic association studies and point out the links of these statistics with other similarity-based tests of genetic association. Finally, potential application of U-statistics in analysis of the next-generation sequencing data and rare variants association studies are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22610525      PMCID: PMC3419299          DOI: 10.1007/s00439-012-1178-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  19 in total

1.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Powerful SNP-set analysis for case-control genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Michael C Wu; Peter Kraft; Michael P Epstein; Deanne M Taylor; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Generalized genomic distance-based regression methodology for multilocus association analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Wessel; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A powerful and flexible multilocus association test for quantitative traits.

Authors:  Lydia Coulter Kwee; Dawei Liu; Xihong Lin; Debashis Ghosh; Michael P Epstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  U-statistics-based tests for multiple genes in genetic association studies.

Authors:  Zhi Wei; Mingyao Li; Timothy Rebbeck; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 1.670

6.  Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability.

Authors:  Brendan Maher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Relationship between genomic distance-based regression and kernel machine regression for multi-marker association testing.

Authors:  Wei Pan
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Gene-trait similarity regression for multimarker-based association analysis.

Authors:  Jung-Ying Tzeng; Daowen Zhang; Sheng-Mao Chang; Duncan C Thomas; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Francis S Collins; Nancy J Cox; David B Goldstein; Lucia A Hindorff; David J Hunter; Mark I McCarthy; Erin M Ramos; Lon R Cardon; Aravinda Chakravarti; Judy H Cho; Alan E Guttmacher; Augustine Kong; Leonid Kruglyak; Elaine Mardis; Charles N Rotimi; Montgomery Slatkin; David Valle; Alice S Whittemore; Michael Boehnke; Andrew G Clark; Evan E Eichler; Greg Gibson; Jonathan L Haines; Trudy F C Mackay; Steven A McCarroll; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Capturing the spectrum of interaction effects in genetic association studies by simulated evaporative cooling network analysis.

Authors:  Brett A McKinney; James E Crowe; Jingyu Guo; Dehua Tian
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  8 in total

1.  From single-SNP to wide-locus: genome-wide association studies identifying functionally related genes and intragenic regions in small sample studies.

Authors:  Knut M Wittkowski; Vikas Sonakya; Tingting Song; Martin P Seybold; Mehdi Keddache; Martina Durner
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.533

2.  A powerful nonparametric statistical framework for family-based association analyses.

Authors:  Ming Li; Zihuai He; Daniel J Schaid; Mario A Cleves; Todd G Nick; Qing Lu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Reexamining Dis/Similarity-Based Tests for Rare-Variant Association with Case-Control Samples.

Authors:  Charlotte Wang; Jung-Ying Tzeng; Pei-Zhen Wu; Martin Preisig; Chuhsing Kate Hsiao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A weighted U-statistic for genetic association analyses of sequencing data.

Authors:  Changshuai Wei; Ming Li; Zihuai He; Olga Vsevolozhskaya; Daniel J Schaid; Qing Lu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA bypass polymerase genes and association with breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes among African Americans and Whites.

Authors:  Leila Family; Jeannette T Bensen; Melissa A Troester; Michael C Wu; Carey K Anders; Andrew F Olshan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  A functional U-statistic method for association analysis of sequencing data.

Authors:  Sneha Jadhav; Xiaoran Tong; Qing Lu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Systems biology approach reveals genome to phenome correlation in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Priyanka Jain; Saurabh Vig; Malabika Datta; Dinesh Jindel; Ashok Kumar Mathur; Sandeep Kumar Mathur; Abhay Sharma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Complex polymorphisms in endocytosis genes suggest alpha-cyclodextrin as a treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Knut M Wittkowski; Christina Dadurian; Martin P Seybold; Han Sang Kim; Ayuko Hoshino; David Lyden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.