Literature DB >> 22609239

What can I do? Recommendations for responding to issues identified by patient-reported outcomes assessments used in clinical practice.

Elizabeth F Hughes1, Albert W Wu, Michael A Carducci, Claire F Snyder.   

Abstract

There is increased interest in using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in routine clinical practice to improve patient management. The effectiveness of this intervention may be facilitated by providing suggestions to clinicians on how to address issues identified by the PROs. We sought to develop recommendations for clinicians on how to respond to issues covered by common cancer PRO questionnaires, including functional problems (eg, physical, social, emotional), symptoms (eg, diarrhea, pain), and needs (eg, patient care and support, information). The recommendations would be incorporated into a Web-based system for PRO assessment and reporting in use at our large, academic cancer center. To develop the recommendations, we conducted a multiphase, multidisciplinary, consensus process. We reviewed the literature and conducted one-on-one interviews with experts from various disciplines. Experts included medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, nurses, an internist, a palliative care specialist, an outcomes researcher, a chaplain, a social worker, and patient advocates. These interviews elicited the experts' recommendations for addressing problems in common PRO domains. Finally, we held a panel meeting attended by all the experts to attain consensus on the recommendations. The final consensus suggestions recommend further assessment of the problem as a first step. Treatment suggestions range from medication adjustments to lifestyle modifications to referrals to other disciplines. Further research will test whether clinicians find these suggestions useful for patient management.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22609239      PMCID: PMC3384764          DOI: 10.1016/j.suponc.2012.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Support Oncol        ISSN: 1544-6794


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group.

Authors:  B Bonevski; R Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; L Burton; P Cook; A Boyes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group.

Authors:  R Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; A Boyes; B Bonevski; L Burton; P Cook
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review.

Authors:  J Greenhalgh; K Meadows
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 4.  Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review.

Authors:  Susan Marshall; Kirstie Haywood; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

Authors:  C A McHorney; A R Tarlov
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  J M Valderas; A Kotzeva; M Espallargues; G Guyatt; C E Ferrans; M Y Halyard; D A Revicki; T Symonds; A Parada; J Alonso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  PatientViewpoint: a website for patient-reported outcomes assessment.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Roxanne Jensen; S Orion Courtin; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Assessment is not enough: a randomized controlled trial of the effects of HRQL assessment on quality of life and satisfaction in oncology clinical practice.

Authors:  Sarah K Rosenbloom; David E Victorson; Elizabeth A Hahn; Amy H Peterman; David Cella
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  19 in total

1.  Symptom Care at Home: A Comprehensive and Pragmatic PRO System Approach to Improve Cancer Symptom Care.

Authors:  Kathi Mooney; Meagan S Whisenant; Susan L Beck
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Pragmatic characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures are important for use in clinical practice.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Patrick O Monahan; Jacob Kean
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Symptom management in the older adult: 2015 update.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.076

4.  Interpreting and Acting on PRO Results in Clinical Practice: Lessons Learned From the PatientViewpoint System and Beyond.

Authors:  Amanda L Blackford; Albert W Wu; Claire Snyder
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint: a web system for patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Amanda L Blackford; Antonio C Wolff; Michael A Carducci; Joseph M Herman; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in clinical practice for patient management: identifying scores requiring a clinician's attention.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Amanda L Blackford; Toru Okuyama; Tatsuo Akechi; Hiroko Yamashita; Tatsuya Toyama; Michael A Carducci; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Patient-physician communication about health-related quality-of-life problems: are non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors willing to talk?

Authors:  Neeraj K Arora; Roxanne E Jensen; Nadiyah Sulayman; Ann S Hamilton; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Using the Computer-based Health Evaluation System (CHES) to Support Self-management of Symptoms and Functional Health: Evaluation of Hematological Patient Use of a Web-Based Patient Portal.

Authors:  Jens Lehmann; Petra Buhl; Johannes M Giesinger; Lisa M Wintner; Monika Sztankay; Lucia Neppl; Wolfgang Willenbacher; Roman Weger; Walpurga Weyrer; Gerhard Rumpold; Bernhard Holzner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Using patient-reported outcome measures for improved decision-making in patients with gastrointestinal cancer - the last clinical frontier in surgical oncology?

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Annbjørg H Søreide
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Use of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures at Group and Patient Levels: Experiences From the Generic Integrated PRO System, WestChronic.

Authors:  Niels Henrik Ingvar Hjollund; Louise Pape Larsen; Karin Biering; Soren Paaske Johnsen; Erik Riiskjær; Liv Marit Schougaard
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2014-02-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.